Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T16CM05017
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/01/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please indicate on plans quantity of oxygen to be stored in building. Refer to table 105.6.8 and section 5306 of the 2012 International Fire Code for limitations. |
| 07/05/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Will Require approval of DP prior to approval of Combo Permit. |
| 07/14/2016 | FRODRIG2 | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 07/14/2016 | FRODRIG2 | WATER | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 07/14/2016 | FRODRIG2 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 07/19/2016 | PIMA COUNTY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Submit heating and cooling load calculations with summary sheets to justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project (IECC C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, and IMC 312.1). 2. On AC Unit Schedule, sheet M0.1, add note that AC-1 requires duct smoke detector (IMC 606.2.1). 3. Verify that all thermostat selected and specified in equipment schedules are capable of automatically adjusting the start time of the HVAC equipment in order to bring the interior conditions to the desired temperature at the start of occupancy (IECC C403.2.4.3.3). |
| 07/19/2016 | PIMA COUNTY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Submit outdoor lighting calculations for the site per Table 401.1 of the City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. 2. On Lighting Plan - Surgery, sheet E2.1 add exit lights over doors 203, 204a, 209a, and 211 to clearly mark exits based on Egress Plan, sheet G002. Also provide emergency light fixtures in staff lounges 204 and 205 (IBC 1006.1). 3. Indicate duct smoke detector for AC-1 on HVAC EQUIPMENT CONNECTION PLAN - SURGERY, sheet E3.3. 4. Will tamper and flow switches for fire riser require power? 5. Provide interior lighting calculations per 2012 IECC C405.5.2. |
| 07/19/2016 | PIMA COUNTY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The submitted COMcheck is insufficient. It shows only one wall type (with no insulation indicated), the concrete slab floor, and no other elements that make up the exterior envelope for this building. Revise to indicate the two different roof systems (metal and BUR) and associated square feet, the two different exterior wall systems (frame and masonry with associated square feet, and all fenestration types (glazed and opaque) with associated areas and rerun program. Indicate proposed insulation for wall and roof systems and proposed U-values and SHGC for fenestration. Then transcribe the required insulation and fenestration U-values/SHGC from the "Passing" COMcheck to the wall sections, details and building sections. 2. The masonry wall dividing the medical offices portion of the building from the surgery center portion of the building prevents free access between the two, and no access between the two for patients/public. This requires that the Code analysis be done as if these are two separate spaces in regards to exiting and plumbing facilities. 3. On sheet G002 remove the redundant code review items on the upper left side of the sheet. They may or may not match the full code review on the right side. 4. On sheet G002 the Plumbing Requirements are calculated incorrectly. Fixture requirements are calculated for both men and women individually. In the case of "B" occupancy men and women use the same fixture ratios. Per item 2 above, the medical offices portion is calculated: 2716 SF/100 = 28/2 = 14 men and 14 women. From the ratio given on Table 2902.1, men require 1 toilet and 1 lavatory and women require 1 toilet and 1 lavatory. This section of the building will require 1 service sink and 1 drinking fountain. For the clinic portion of the building, 5481 SF/100 = 55/2 = 28 men and 27 women. Per Table 2902.1 men require 2 toilets and 1 lavatory and women require 2 toilets and 1 lavatory. This section of building will require 1 service sink and either a drinking fountain or a point of use water dispenser with permanent water source per COT policy. Show location on plan. 5. On sheet S2.1 the new post east of the Reception/Scheduler room should be HSS 5x5x3/8 (instead of ¼), and the glulam above the Reception/Scheduler room should be 5 1/8 x 18 (instead of 16 ½) per the structural calculations. 6. On sheet S2.1 keynote 1 at the right side of the sheet should be 3, and header H3 at the reception area opening should have structural calculations since it will support two roof areas. 7. On sheet A103.1 revise the reception counter to comply with ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 904.3 for handicap accessibility. 8. On sheet A103.1 the staff lounge 204 is enclosed by 1-hour fire-rated walls with one of the two doors rated 20-minutes. What is the reasoning for this? 9. On sheet A103.2 revise the check-in and check-out counters to comply with ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 904.3 for handicap accessibility. 10. On sheet A103.2 section/detail markers 1 and 2/A301.1 refer to a sheet that does not exist in the drawing set. 11. Exit signs on sheet A104 do not match locations shown on E2.1 and E2.2. 12. On sheet A105 detail 5 refers to "E.I.F.S. system on GWB". Other notes elsewhere indicate a 2-coat stucco system. Which is to be used? Coordinate drawings. Also, this detail calls for drywall sheathing which is not indicated in structural sheets although another note directs us there. 13. The east elevation on Sheet A201 references keynote A52 (standing seam metal roof on purlins) for the long sloped roof at the building entry. However the roof plan shows this roof as BUR and the framing plans show the roof structure as TJI's. This note is repeated on building section 5/A301. 14. On both Sheets A201 and A301 keynote A31 refers to the existing portion of the building having new roof purlins; however the structural framing plans indicate that the purlins are existing. 15. Exterior elevation 1/A201 and interior elevation 1/A603 show an unbroken band of windows 41'-3" long. The structural sheets show no lintel for this long window nor intermediate supports, and there are no structural calculations for this extensive opening in this bearing wall. Same for adjacent 9'-9" window opening. If these are existing openings indicate removal of existing windows on the demolition plan and submit structural calculations for the existing lintels and intermediates as they now support a greater roof area. 16. On building section 2/A301 there is a section reference 1/A302. This section does not seem to match the location. 17. The large ceiling structures above the two reception areas shown on the reflected ceiling plan, building sections 5 and 6/A301 along with detail 5/A104 give little information as to what this low ceiling is constructed of and how it will be supported. Provide structural calculations with a framing plan and construction details. 18. Provide exterior wall sections keyed to building sections on sheets A301 that accurately show how walls and roofs are constructed from bottom of foundation to top of roof, insulation, how finish systems and their components are applied and how the envelope is to be made weatherproof. Wall sections and details should be taken through each different exterior wall type and roof assembly with sufficient notation for plans reviewer and contractor to clearly understand intent. 19. Wall sections on sheet A302 have not been developed into construction drawings. See note 17 above. 20. Revise reception counter elevations per notes 7 and 9 above. 21. Details for roof access hatch with ladder and for skylights are included on sheet A520; however these items do not appear on floor plans, ceiling plan or roof plan. 22. On sheet A522, detail 3 indicates Dryvit Outsulation system. Is this what will be used? See note 12 above. Also, detail indicated R-22 insulation. Tailor this detail to what will be installed. See note 1 above. This detail is labeled "Convert to 2 Coat Stucco @ Conc. Slab". Is this the intent of the detail? If so, how will this be accomplished to retain weather resistance of the wall assembly? 23. On sheet A602 the Door Schedule shows exterior exit doors 101, 201, 204a, and 209a with panic hardware, but not exit doors 116a and 124. What is the reasoning for this? These doors also show hardware type B which calls for a lockset and deadbolt. Per 1008.1.9. egress doors shall be readily openable from the egress side without the use of a key or special knowledge or effort. A deadbolt would prohibit this. 24. On storefront elevation 2/A603 U-factors are shown for the window wall and entry doors. Please make sure that these same values are reflected in the revised COMcheck or revise. See item 1 above. 25. The equipment schedule and plan on sheet A701 is incomplete. 26. Sheet M2.2 shows two fan coil units suspended from existing Z-purlins. Submit structural calculations to verify that existing structure as shown can accommodate these point loads. |
| 07/19/2016 | PIMA COUNTY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Per COT amendment to 2012 IPC the lavatory faucet must deliver no more than 0.25 gallon per metering cycle. Indicate this in Plumbing Fixture Specification. 2. Water Calculations on sheet P0.1 indicates an existing 2" water meter, however the Development Plan, note 23, indicates a 5/8" water meter. Confirm that the water meter for this building is 2". |