Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T16CM03514
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/16/2016 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/23/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is a single fitting, not a field-assembled group of individual fittings as shown in detail 4/P7.U.1. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2012. 2. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 3-compartment sink (detail 5/P7.U.1) to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012. 3. Revise detail 5/P7.U.1 by deleting the external flow control device: the specified hydromechanical grease interceptor is equipped with an integral flow control device. Reference: Section 303.2, IPC 2012. |
| 05/23/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/23/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the size of the water meter serving this suite, the size of the backflow preventer associated with the water meter. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Verify the available water pressure for this site with Tucson Water. Use the minimum daily service pressure for the water pressure calculations. Reference: Section A1.1, UPC 2012. |
| 05/25/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Banner University Medical Center - North Campus Outpatient Superstructure and UG Utilities (1st Review) T16CM03514 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 25, 2016 DUE DATE: June 3, 2016 COMMENTS: Address the following zoning comments. Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Comment 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans as it relates to the zoning review purview of the building plans such as heights, square footage, and building footprint but cannot approve them at this time. While the plans are consistent with the current version of the development package under review zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved and the building plans are reviewed and approved by the PDSD structural plans reviewer and other PDSD commercial review agencies. Comment 2. Please clarify if the height of the top of the mechanical equipment screening 57'-6" as noted on the building footprint of the Architectural site plan or is the height of 60'-0" (noted as Level 5) on the building elevations and sections the actual height of the top of the mechanical equipment screen wall. Comment 3. Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal and compare them to the development package for consistency. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Building Plans as required |
| 05/26/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comment. Also Provide a written response. Ref: Plan Sheets EU2.1B, EU5.1, EU5.2. Please indicate conduit sizes and quantity for the Secondary Service Feeders, MSB-1 and MSB-2. Ref: 2012 IBC 107.2.1 |
| 06/01/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development package must be approved first. |
| 06/07/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G2.1.1; PROJECT CODE SUMMARY: THE INFORMATION ON THIS SHEET (FIRE RESISTANCE RATING, AREA CALCULATIONS, OCCUPANCY LOADS, EGRESS TRAVEL, ETC.) WILL BE REVIEWED IN A LATER PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 2. SHEET G2.1.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE BUILDING OCCUPANCY SUMMARY. 3. SHEETS G2.2.1 AND G2.2.2: THESE SHEETS WILL BE REVIEWED IN A LATER PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 4. SHEETS G2.2.1 AND G2.2.2 (LEVEL 2 AND LEVEL 3 PLANS); SHEETS S1.0.2 AND S1.0.3 (LEVEL 2 AND LEVEL 3 LOADING PLANS): THE PLANS ON G2.2.1 AND G2.2.2 INDICATE ASSEMBLY AREAS (A-3) ALONG THE NORTH EXTERIOR WALL, WHILE THE PLANS ON S1.0.2 AND S1.0.3 INDICATE TYPICAL FLOOR LOADING (80 PSF LIVE LOAD) IN THAT AREA. IS THE 80 PSF LIVE LOAD ADEQUATE FOR ASSEMBLY LOADING PER THE IBC TABLE 1607.1? PLEASE VERIFY. 5. SHEET S2.1.D: WERE THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THIS ENTRY ROOF INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL? PLEASE VERIFY. 6. SHEET S2.5.2; ROOF FRAMING PLAN 1: WERE THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THIS CANOPY ROOF INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL? PLEASE VERIFY. 7. SHEETS S3.2.0 THROUGH S3.2.3: WERE THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE SHEAR WALLS (ALL LEVELS) INCLUDED IN THE FOUNDATION SUBMITTAL? PLEASE VERIFY. 8. SHEET S4.1.1; VAULT ROOF FRAMING PLAN: WERE THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE ROOF/VAULTS AREA INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL? PLEASE VERIFY. 9. SHEET S7.0.2; DETAIL 8: PLEASE MOVE THE DETAIL TITLE. 10. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/08/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed |