Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T16CM03513
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/16/2016 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/23/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/23/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/23/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/23/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/26/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Banner University Medical Center - North Campus Parking Structure Building Plans (1st Review) T16CM03514 (Related to DP16-0030) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 26, 2016 DUE DATE: June 6, 2016 COMMENTS: Address the following zoning comments. Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Comment 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans as it relates to the zoning review purview of the building plans such as heights, square footage, and building footprint but cannot approve them at this time. While the plans are consistent with the current version of the development package under review zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved and the building plans are reviewed and approved by the PDSD structural plans reviewer and other PDSD commercial review agencies. Comment 2. Sheets A6.1.1 through A6.1.3 are listed on the sheet index on sheet G1.1 but were not included in the building Package. Include the missing sheets on the next submittal for review. Comment 3. Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal and compare them to the development package for consistency. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Building Plans as required |
| 06/01/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The development package must be approved first. |
| 06/06/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G2.1.1; PROJECT CODE SUMMARY: THE INFORMATION ON THIS SHEET (FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS, AREA CALCULATIONS, OCCUPANCY LOADS, EGRESS TRAVEL, ETC.) WILL BE REVIEWED IN A LATER PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 2. SHEET G2.2.1: THIS SHEET WILL BE REVIEWED IN A LATER PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 3. SHEET S1.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE SPECIAL INSPECTIONS. 4. SHEET S1.1; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (LOADS): PER THE IBC TABLE 1607.1(14), CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADS FOR GARAGE FLOORS MUST FOLLOW THE DESIGN AS INDICATED IN NOTE (a). PLEASE INDICATE ON THE GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES THIS CONCENTRATED LOADING OPTION HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED IN THE DESIGN CALCULATIONS. 5. SHEETS S2.2.0 AND S2.3.0; FLOOR KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 12 INDICATES THE PRECAST IS TO BE DESIGNED FOR A 100 PSF LIVE LOAD (UNREDUCIBLE) AT A SPECIFIC LOCATION, WHILE THE DESIGN LIVE LOADS INDICATED ON SHEET S1.1 ARE 40 PSF (UNREDUCIBLE) PLEASE CLARIFY THE 100 PSF DESIGN LIVE LOAD WAS APPLIED AT THE PLAN LOCATION IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. 6. SHEET S2.2.0 (LEVEL TWO FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL 210): THE DETAIL TITLE INDICATES THIS IS A SHEAR WALL, BUT THE FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S2.2.0 DOES NOT INDICATE A SHEAR WALL (SHEET S2.2.1B DOES INDICATE THE SHEAR WALL). PLEASE CLARIFY. 7. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGE 2: THE FINAL LOAD ON THIS PAGE INDICATES 'ROOF LIVE LOAD: FLOOR LIVE LOAD 20.0 PSF'. THIS WOULD BE THE CORRECT LIVE LOAD FOR THE STAIR ROOF AREAS. IS THE VERBIAGE 'FLOOR LL' INCORRECT? PLEASE VERIFY. 8. GENERAL: PLEASE VERIFY ALL LOADINGS SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS AND USED IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN REVISED SINCE THE FIRST FOUNDATION REVIEW (T16CM02493) WAS DONE. 9. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/07/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/09/2016 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |