Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T16CM02494
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2016 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/19/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/19/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/19/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/25/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: Banner University Medical Center - North Campus Outpatient Center T16CM02494 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 25, 2016 1. The steel and stairs package has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The steel and stairs package has been reviewed and it appears that the plans match development package DP16-0030. But until development package DP16-0030 is approved Zoning cannot approve the steel and stairs package. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 04/27/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | Development Package must be approved first. |
| 05/03/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G2.1.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE BUILDING OCCUPANCY SUMMARY. 2. SHEET G2.1.1: THIS SHEET WILL BE REVIEWED DURING A LATER PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 3. SHEETS G2.2.1 AND G2.2.2: LIFE SAFETY PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED DURING A LATER PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. 4. SHEETS G2.2.1 AND G2.2.2 (LEVEL 2 AND LEVEL 3 PLANS); SHEETS S1.0.2 AND S1.0.3 (LEVEL 2 AND LEVEL 3 LOADING PLANS): THE PLANS ON G2.2.1 AND G2.2.2 INDICATE ASSEMBLY AREAS (A-3) ALONG THE NORTH EXTERIOR WALL, WHILE THE PLANS ON S1.0.2 AND S1.0.3 INDICATE TYPICAL FLOOR LOADING (80 PSF LIVE LOAD) IN THAT AREA. IS THE 80 PSF LIVE LOAD ADEQUATE FOR ASSEMBLY LOADING PER THE IBC TABLE 1607.1? PLEASE VERIFY. 5. SHEETS G2.2.1 AND G2.2.2: PLEASE PROVIDE NORTH ARROWS ON THE PLANS. 6. SHEETS S1.0.2 AND S1.0.4; FLOOR LOADING LEGEND: AT THE MECHANICAL ROOF, PLEASE VERIFY HOW THE 125 PSF ROOF LIVE LOAD WAS DERIVED. IS THE 20 PSF LIVE LOAD APPLIED IN ADDITION TO THE 125 PSF? PLEASE VERIFY. 7. SHEET S2.1.A; FOUNDATION PLAN: WAS THE DESIGN FOR THE LINEAR ACCELERATOR FOUNDATION INCLUDED IN THIS SET OF CALCULATIONS? PLEASE VERIFY. 8. SHEETS S2.1.A, S2.1.B, AND S2.1.C; FOUNDATION PLAN: PLEASE VERIFY THE NOTE THAT INDICATES 'SLAB ON GRADE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL'. 9. SHEET S2.1.C (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGES 76 AND 77): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE AN 11' WIDE MAT FOUNDATION (MATCHING SHEET S2.1.C), BUT PAGE 77 OF THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES A 14.25' WIDE FOOTING. PLEASE CLARIFY THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. 10. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGE 10: THE TYPICAL FLOOR LIVE LOAD IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES 50 PSF, WHILE THE LEVEL 2 AND LEVEL 3 LOADING PLANS (S1.0.2 AND S1.0.3) INDICATE 80 PSF LIVE LOAD. PLEASE CLARIFY. 11. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE THE FLOOR FRAMING PLANS AND THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN FOR REFERENCE. 12. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/03/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/19/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |