Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T16CM01945
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/25/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 25, 2015 DUE DATE: April 11, 2016 SUBJECT: New Restaurant TO: Diana K. Flynn LOCATION: 765 E. Wetmore Road REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: T16CM01945 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per previous comment 1 on the development package (ie. DP15-0207) TSM 2-01.4.1D and TSM 2-01.4.1C6 please add a general note to sheet 1 that reflects the geotechnical report recommendations from section 4.7.2 which require concrete have a compressive strength of 4,000 psi. 2) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please list the DP15-0207 and T16CM01945 numbers on the plan. 3) Per previous comment 25 on the development package (ie. DP15-0207) submittal and TSM 2-01.4.1C6 please add a general note indicating that per Section 4.2.1 of the Geotechnical Report, site Preparation, that all materials derived from the demolition of existing pavements should be removed from the site and not be allowed for use as on-site fill. 4) Per previous comment 26 on the development package (ie. DP15-0207) submittal and TSM 2-01.4.1C6 please add a general note indicating that "per Section 3.1 of the Geotechnical Report, Typical Subsurface profile, that based on the field penetration testing, the existing fill soils are very loose to medium dense in relatively density and are not considered suitable for support of any structural elements associated with the proposed project. Existing fill soils were encountered across the entire site up to a depth of nine feet." If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 04/06/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET T1.1: THE CODE ANALYSIS ON THIS SHEET WILL BE REVIEWED AT THE TIME OF THE FIRST TENANT SUBMITTAL. 2. SHEET T1.1: THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THIS TENANT WILL INCLUDE THE 520 SF LISTED FOR THE PATIO. THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD WILL ALSO INCREASE TO INCLUDE THE PATIO. 3. SHEET AS1.1; SITE PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE WHY THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE INDICATES 3700 SF ON THE SITE PLAN AND 3564 SF ON THE SHEET T1.1. 4. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 10 REFERENCES 9/AS2.1 FOR A PIPE BOLLARD. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 5. SHEET A3.1; SECTION 2: A DETAIL REFERENCES 3/A6.1 ON GRID LINE 1. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 6. SHEET A3.1; SECTION KEYNOTES: NOTE 12 REFERENCES 9/AS2.1 FOR A PIPE BOLLARD. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 7. SHEET A4.1; SECTION KEYNOTES: NOTE 7 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. PLEASE VERIFY. 8. SHEET A4.1; SECTION 2: A KEYNOTE 8 IS INDICATED ON THE WALL. PLEASE REVISE. 9. SHEET S1.0; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE 1 REFERENCES A SOIL REPORT. PLEASE PROVIDE ONE COPY FOR REVIEW. 10. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 107: PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DESIGN. 11. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 04/07/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 04/07/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise keynote 4 on sheet A5.1 to show the dimensions of the secondary (overflow) scupper in a permanent manner (i.e. not written on whiteout). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide the civil drawings that will be used to install the site utilities (e.g. water service, natural gas, and building sewer) and will show the location of the water meter, reduced pressure backflow preventer, and the building sewer connection (BCS). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 04/07/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/07/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/07/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/21/2016 | RBENT1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 04/21/2016 | RBENT1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/21/2016 | RBENT1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |