Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW - COMMERCIAL
Permit Number - T16CM00478
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW - COMMERCIAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/29/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/03/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/05/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: February 5, 2016 DUE DATE: February 17, 2016 SUBJECT: Raytheon Modular Data Center 917 TO: Christopher G. Langham, PE LOCATION: 1151 E. Hermans Road REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: T16CM00478 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) The 404 compliance statement found on page 7 of the drainage report has the wrong section and range list. Please list as Section 19, Township 15 south, Range 14 East. 2) Page 11 of the drainage report has a typo (1 mile feet southwest) as it describes the location of the project site relative to the Hughes Wash. It appears the Hughes Wash, with TSMS node (Q = 1,034 cfs) is approximately 650 feet southeast of the site. The project site is also about 800 feet north of the Hughes Wash after the wash turns to the west. 3) Per UDC 7.14.4 please check capacity of the storm drain against the requirements of chapter 10 of the Drainage Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management as it now conveys 7.6 cfs under developed conditions instead of 2.9 cfs under existing conditions at CP OS2. Please include the input and output data from the Storm CAD run mentioned in item 8 within the appendix of the report. Please summarize the results in the text of the report. 4) Per UDC 7.4.6F3 and AM2-06.4.9H2please show sight visibility triangles at the intersection of the existing access drives and verify that no obstructions are present. 5) Per UDC 7.4.6F4 and UDC 7.4.6H1 please dimension a 3' back up spur, show a wheel barrier at the boundary of the back up spur, and then show 3 feet between this wheel barrier and the closest obstruction over six inches in height (ie the building). There is a concern that a vehicle may back into the building if no wheel barrier exists between the parking area and the building. 6) Per TSM 7.01.4.2A sidewalks associated with PAALs must be separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation (minimum six inches), barriers, railings, or other means, except at designated crosswalks. Please show sidewalk next to the building is either raised or otherwise physically separated from the paved parking area on page 3 of the development package. 7) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the DP16-015 and T16CM00478 numbers to the title block area. 8) Per AM 2-06.4.7C2 please add the following note, "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the site visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." 9) Per AM 2-06.4.8C please provide dimensions for and between sidewalks, curbs, curb opening and existing access drives. 10) Per AM 2-06.4.9H1 please show accessible ramp for the area adjacent to the handicap parking space if the placement of a barrier between the sidewalk and the paved section of the parking lot create such a need. 11) The DP16-0015 must be approved prior to approval of this plan set. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 02/11/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1151 E. Hermans Road T16CM00478 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 11, 2016 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans cannot be approved until development package, DP16-0015, has been approved. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 02/19/2016 | CPIERCE1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 02/19/2016 | CPIERCE1 | ADA | REVIEW | Needs Review | REVIEWED AT 3RD PARTY |
| 02/23/2016 | AROMERO4 | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/23/2016 | AROMERO4 | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | AT 3RD PARTY OFFICE | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/23/2016 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |