Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T15CM06798
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/05/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/15/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 10/15/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET T1; BUILDING CODE SUMMARY (EXIT REQUIREMENTS): THE DRAWING INDICATES THE NUMBER OF EXITS REQUIRED IS ONE. THE IBC TABLE 1015.1 INDICATES ONE EXIT IS ALLOWED WHEN THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR AN 'A' OCCUPANCY IS 49 OR LESS. SINCE THE OCCUPANT LOAD IS 51, TWO EXITS ARE REQUIRED. PLEASE REVISE THE DRAWING. 2. SHEET T1; BUILDING CODE SUMMARY (EXIT REQUIREMENTS): THE EXIT WIDTH REQUIRED REFERENCES TABLE 1005.1. PLEASE REVISE THE TABLE REFERENCE. 3. SHEET T1; BUILDING CODE SUMMARY: A REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE 2003 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE. PLEASE REVISE TO THE 2009 EDITION. 4. SHEET T1; BUILDING CODE SUMMARY (OCCUPANT LOAD): THE EXTERIOR DINING AREA OCCUPANT LOAD MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD. PLEASE REVISE ON THE DRAWINGS. 5. SHEET T1; BUILDING CODE SUMMARY (LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS); SHEET T4 (LIFE SAFETY PLAN): THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN INDICATES PANIC HARDWARE AT THE THREE EXITS, WHILE THE BUILDING CODE SUMMARY INDICATES NO PANIC HARDWARE. THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET A7 ALSO INDICATES PANIC HARDWARE AT THOSE DOORS. PLEASE CLARIFY. 6. SHEET T5; HANDICAP SEATING NOTE: WHERE THE CALCULATION INDICATES 2.3 HANDICAP SEATS ARE REQUIRED, PLEASE PROVIDE THREE SEATS AND REVISE THE DRAWING. 7. SHEET S0; GENERAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE C INDICATES A SOILS REPORT WAS PROVIDED FOR THE SOIL PREPARATION. PLEASE PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 8. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE TWO SETS OF STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR REVIEW. 9. SHEET S1; FOUNDATION PLAN: A SECTION 3/S3 IS CUT AT GRIDS D AND 6. PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION SHEET NUMBER. 10. SHEET S2; HANGER SUPPORT DETAIL: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWING (OR ADD A REFERENCE NOTE) THE REQUIRED FRAMING AND CONNECTIONS AT THE HOOD SUPPORT. 11. SHEET S5; SECTIONS 5 AND 6: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE SECTION HOW THE DOUBLE 6" STEEL STUD BRACES ARE CONNECTED TO THE TOP AND BOTTOM CHORDS OF THE JOIST. 12. SHEET S5; SECTIONS 1, 2, AND 3: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE SECTION HOW THE 4X4 BRACE ANGLE IS CONNECTED TO THE TOP CHORD OF THE JOIST. 13. SHEET A1; CONSTRUCTION NOTE 27: IF THE RACKING IS BETWEEN 6 FEET TALL AND 12 FEET TALL, PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS OF HOW IT IS CONNECTED TO THE FLOOR. 14. SHEET A1; CONSTRUCTION NOTE 3: VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THE SALES COUNTER MEETS THE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 904. 15. SHEET A1; CONSTRUCTION NOTE 17: PLEASE REVISE THE BOLLARD DETAIL REFERENCE. 16. SHEET A10; SECTIONS 1 AND 2: THE SECTION AT THE STOREFRONT REFERENCES 9/A12 SIM. PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE. 17. SHEETS EQ1 AND EQ2: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE TABLE OF EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATIONS. 18. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 10/20/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. For the use of PEX tubing, provide a branch tube sizing chart showing the correct size of PEX tubing to be used as a substitute for the copper pipe shown on the drawings. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 604.3, IPC 2012. 2. Provide an automatic faucet for the lavatory, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Verify that the automatic faucet will operate for a minimum time of 10-seconds. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-03. 3. Clarify the type of water closet being installed. The Plumbing Fixture Schedule calls out a tank-type water closet but specifies a water closet with a flush valve. Similarly, the water supply calculations call out a tank-type water closet but use the fixture units for a flush-valve water closet. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 4. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type M copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.2 FPS; 1" PEX has a velocity of 13.7 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. 5. Clarify the application of a pressure vacuum breaker (Watts 800M) for the water heaters. Detail 15/P8 does not show any vacuum breakers being utilized; did you mean to refer to a vacuum relief valve (e.g. a Watts N36)? No backflow protection is required for the water heaters. Reference: Section 608.1, IPC 2012. 6. The Watts model N9 dual-check vacuum breaker (now obsolete, replaced by the LFN9) is not listed for use with high-hazard applications. Reference: Section 608.1, IPC 2012. 7. Clarify how the Watts SD-2 dual check valve for carbonated beverage machines (ASSE 1032) was selected for the applications shown on sheet P1. Reference: Section 608.1, IPC 2012. 8. Clarify the application of the backflow protection for the mop sink. Reference: Section 608.1, IPC 2012. 9. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 3-compartment sink to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012. 10. Indirect waste receptors (e.g. hub drains, floor sinks, trench drains, etc.) shall have ready access. Verify the locations of the proposed indirect waste receptors are visible for inspection and have ready access for cleaning. Reference: Section 802.3, IPC 2012. 11. Revise detail 2/P8 to extend the rim of the hub drain at least 1" above the finished floor. Reference: Section 802.3.2, IPC 2012. 12. Hand sinks in a food service area are allowed to connect to the sanitary waste system instead of the grease waste system only if each sink has a sign posted above it stating, "HANDWASH SINK ONLY! NO FOOD PREPARATION OR DISHWASHING ALLOWED." Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 13. Provide a vent downstream of the gravity grease separator to protect the seal for the grease separator. Reference: Section 1003.9, IPC 2012. 14. Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012. 15. Clarify the termination points of the roof and canopy downspouts; the civil plans do not appear to include a storm drain system. Reference: Section 1101.2, IPC 2012. |
| 10/20/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The civil drawings for this building indicate that a 1" water meter is being installed. Tucson Water limits 1" water meters to maximum demand of 37.5-GPM but your calculations indicate an expected demand of 54 GPM. Coordinate the installation of a new 1-1/2" water meter with Tucson Water. Note that the civil drawings also call for the installation of a 1-1/2" water service pipe, not the 2" pipe that you require to limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPM. |
| 10/21/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please provide full compliance with the Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. |
| 10/21/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clarify the solar heat gain factor for the windows. The energy code summary lists the windows as having a shading coefficient of "0.39 Max" but the COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certificate show a SHGF of 0.39. Which is correct? 2. The NFRC certification numbers (CPD#) for the fenestration have not been included in this submittal. Include the requirement that the submitted fenestration shall have NFRC certified SHGC and U-values that do not exceed those shown in the energy code summary. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. 3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012. 4. Verify that the HVAC unit controls have been provided with an automatic start capability. Reference: Section C403.2.4.3.3, IECC 2012. 5. Condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain or gutter unless the roof drain or gutter terminates at or below grade in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 6. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted (i.e. the exhaust fans shall operate when HVAC air is supplied to the restrooms, not just when the restroom is occupied). Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012. 7. The City of Tucson did not adopt ASHRAE Standard 62.1 for ventilation calculations and the 2012 IMC only references the ASHRAE Standard for the purpose of calculating the system ventilation efficiency (Ev). Provide calculations to show that the ventilation system is sized in accordance with Section 403.3, IMC 2012; for HVAC systems serving multiple zones (see Section 403.3.2.3, IMC 2012). |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/13/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |