Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T15CM06499
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/02/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 15; SHEET ASP1 (SITE PLAN): PER THE IBC TABLE 602, THE PORTION OF THE WEST WALL THAT IS 5'-5" FROM THE PROPERTY LINE MUST ALSO HAVE A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF ONE HOUR (WALL 6F). THIS WALL MUST CONTINUE ON GRID 1 AND GRID 3 UNTIL IT IS 10'-0" FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE REVISE THIS PLAN. 2. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: THE OPENINGS IN THE WEST WALL MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC TABLE 705.8. INDICATE ON THE PLAN THE PERCENTAGE OF EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS ALLOWED, AND THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF WALL OPENINGS. REVISE THE PLAN AS REQUIRED. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 16; SHEET A1 (PARTITION TYPES): WALL TYPES 4A AND 4B STILL REFERENCE THE WRONG SECTIONS. PLEASE REVISE. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 18; SHEET A1 (FLOOR PLAN): THE IBC SECTION 1005.7.1 HAS NO EXCEPTIONS FOR THE USE OF THE ROOM WHOSE DOOR ENCROACHES ON THE REQUIRED. EGRESS WIDTH. PLEASE REVISE. 5. PREVIOUS COMMENT 25; SHEET A4 (SECTION B): THE DETAIL REFERENCE 4/A6.1 WAS NOT REVISED. 6. PREVIOUS COMMENT 26; SHEET A4 (SECTION C): THE DETAIL REFERENCE 1/A6.1 WAS NOT REVISED. 7. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/05/2015 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/05/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/05/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: TOCCO Financial Services T15CM06499 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 5, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. This comment was not addressed. As the proposed building will cross existing property lines a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request form with your next submittal. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 11/18/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/18/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Comment not resolved; provide the hydraulic calculations used to determine the size of the scuppers. [Initial comment: The use of Table 1106.2, IPC 2012 is not an appropriate method for determining the size of a scupper. The table is for determining the size of vertical conductor and leaders; scuppers are weirs, not pipes and their sizes are hydraulically calculated. Provide calculations to determine the size of roof scuppers that are adequate to protect the roof from the rain load. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012.] |
| 11/18/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed |