Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T15CM02238
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET 0.2 NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED. THE ROOM NUMBERS FOR THE CONFERENCE ROOMS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED ON THIS SHEET. 2. PLEASE INDICATE OCCUPANT CALCULATIONS/USED FOR ALL AREAS ON THIS SHEET. 3. IT APPEARS THAT THE OCCUPANT LOAD SERVING EXIT #2 AND EXIT #1 IS MORE THAN THE PROVIDED WIDTH. I BELIEVE THE OCCUPANT LOAD SERVING THESE EXITS IS LESS, BUT I NEED YOU TO CLARIFY. KEN BROUILLETTE |
| 04/21/2015 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SHEET 0.2 1. The assembly portion of the total building is less than 10% of the total building size, it is therefore an incidental use to the primary building use of "B". Please change the building occupancy use to "B" only: 2012 IBC, section 509.3. 2. The previous use of this building on the north side was a 23,280 s.f. restaurant as per the Certificate of Occupancy issue in 1997. The plans submitted changes this use from an A2 to a "B" and is subject to 2012 IBC code compliances and to possible additional impact fees a. Your total building size is more than allowed for a "B" occupancy, VB building type of construction. Even though allowed by the zoing Pad 2 for size, you must still show how the overall size of 34,200 s.f. is allowed by the 2012 IBC, Table 503, Section 504.2, 506.3 and 506.3. b. If the above 2012 IBC allowances do not provide compliance, try justification through the 2012 IEBC, Section 1012.5.2. 3. Please provide a more detailed square footage break down showing, first floor, second floor, basement and total square footage. 4. On the exiting plan, why is the pair of exterior doors shown in room 207 not utilized as a exit egress? a. Reevaluate exiting occupancy loads exiting to widths of exits provided. SHEET 1.1 5. On the second level, finish labeling the room names and numbers. 6. Finish labeling the rooms as to their use on the first floor plan. 7. Provide a basement floor plan. 8. Doors 147, 129A and 129E when open reduces the egress path by more thann 1/2: 2012 IBC, Section 1005.7.1. 9. Will toilet rooms 192 and 193 be accessible to the rest of the building when conferencing is in session? Maybe an open corridor in front of these rooms for access is needed? SHEET 1.2 10. Door 234 when open, reduces the egress path by more than 1/2: 2012 IBC, Section 1005.7.1. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS 11. Structural sheets need to be added to the construction document submittal: a. Please provide structural framing and foundation plans showing all structural modifications. b. Please include all the structural construction details provided in the calculations. c. Please add any and all new sheets to the sheet index plan on sheet 0.1 12. Please provide structural deatils and calculations for the following: a. Replacement of all roof top mounted HVAC units b. All new HVAC roof top mounted HVAC units c. Platform mounted water heater, include wall analysis END OF REVIEW |
| 04/21/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/24/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/27/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide a design for mounting the shelf for the water heater to the building structure along with calculations to show that the water heater will not adversely affect the wall to which it is attached. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012 2. Verify that the specified lavatory faucets for P1 can be set to dispense a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Provide automatic faucets for the P1A, P1B, and P1C lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Provide a shut off valve for appliances requiring maintenance (e.g. the hot water recirculation pump). Reference: Section 606.2, IPC 2012. 5. Provide sufficient information on the drawings to show that the developed length of the hot water supply piping from a hot water source to a hot water outlet does not exceed fifty feet. Reference: Section 607.2, IPC 2012. 6. Show the flow rate of the hot water recirculation system. Reference: Section 607.2, IPC 2012. 7. Reroute the hot water return for the recirculating hot water system to connect to the cold water inlet of the water heater. Reference: Section 607.2.2, IPC 2012. 8. Details 6/14.3 and 8/14.3 show a "TTV-1" supplying tempered water to the mop sink P-3. Is TTV-1 the same as TMV-1? |
| 04/27/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the new heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. (This requirement applies only to the new heating and cooling equipment intended to provide for human comfort, not equipment cooling.) Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012. 2. Notes on sheet 15.1 state that for what appears to be for rooms 170, 189, and 190, "Exist supply and return to remain as is." To what A/C units do these notes apply and how is the balancer to verify that the areas obtain the required amount of outside air? |
| 04/27/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Manning House T15CM02238 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 27, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans cannot be approved until the revision to development package, DP15-0036, has been approved. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 04/28/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | While the electrical review for the current submittal is approved, due to the potential modifications necessary to address comments associated with the reviews of other disciplines the electrical workflow is denoted as denied in order to verify that those modifications will not adversely impact the electrical review. Dan Santa Cruz, Electrical Plan Review Dan.santacruz@tucsonaz.gov |