Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T15CM01732
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
03/19/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
03/23/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Will approve the building plan upon approval of the DP Package. |
03/27/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET 0.2; LEGEND: THE FIRST ITEM LISTED IS A DRAFT CURTAIN. DO WE HAVE A DRAFT CURTAIN IN THIS PROJECT? PLEASE VERIFY. 2. SHEET 0.2; PLANS 1, 2, AND 3: FOR EACH FLOOR, PLEASE DEFINE THE AREAS DENOTED AS B, A-3, AND S-2, AND INDICATE AN OCCUPANT LOAD AT EACH OF THOSE AREAS. 3. SHEET 0.2; FLOOR PLAN 3: TABLE 1021.2(2) INDICATES THE THIRD STORY MUST HAVE MORE THAN ONE EXIT. THE THIRD FLOOR TENANT AREA HAS ONLY ONE EXIT (THE EXIT THROUGH THE SHELL SPACE IS NOT ALLOWED PER SECTION 1014). IF ACCESS TO EXIT 2 IS PROVIDED (CORRIDOR), INDICATE THE ALLOWED AND ACTUAL TRAVEL DISTANCE ON THE PLAN. 4. SHEET 0.2; PLANS 1, 2, AND 3: THE SOUTHWEST CORNER STAIR (EXIT 1) IS NOT RATED, THEREFORE THE NORTH WALL OF THE STAIR AND OPENINGS AT THE ELEVATOR AREA MUST BE RATED ASSEMBLIES. PLEASE VERIFY. 5. SHEET 0.2; PLAN 3: SINCE THE STAIR IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER (EXIT 1) IS NOT RATED, THE EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE MUST MEET THE LIMITS OF TABLE 1016.2. THE DISTANCE MUST INCLUDE THE 132' SHOWN ON THE PLAN, PLUS THE DISTANCE DOWN THE STAIR ALL THE WAY TO THE EXIT ON THE FIRST FLOOR. PLEASE PROVIDE THAT ANALYSIS ON THE PLAN. 6. SHEET 0.2; BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS (PLUMBING FIXTURES): PLEASE VERIFY THE NUMBER OF THE FIXTURES PROVIDED. THE NUMBERS INDICATED DO NOT SEEM TO MATCH THE FIXTURES SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SHOW THE PLUMBING CALCULATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. SHEET 0.2; PLAN 2: THE PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE AN ACCESSIBLE WATER CLOSET FOR MEN AND WOMEN IN THE RESTROOM. VERIFY THE UNISEX RESTROOMS AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF REQUIRED FIXTURES MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1109.2. 8. SHEET 0.2; PLANS 1, 2, AND 3: PLEASE FOLLOW SECTION 1016.3 FOR THE METHOD TO MEASURE THE EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE. 9. SHEET 1.1; FLOOR PLAN: PER SECTION 1018.6, THE CORRIDOR MUST BE CONTINUOUS FROM THE POINT OF ENTRY TO AN EXIT, AND SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED BY INTERVENING ROOMS. CORRIDOR 105 (BETWEEN THE WAREHOUSE AND THE OPEN OFFICE) DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET THAT REQUIREMENT. PLEASE VERIFY. 10. SHEET 1.1; FLOOR PLAN: ALL OF THE WALL TYPES LISTED ARE NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN, AND MANY WALLS ON THE PLAN ARE NOT IDENTIFIED. PLEASE REVISE. IF WALL A, B, OR C ARE TYPICAL AS NOTED, PLEASE INDICATE ONE OR TWO LOCATIONS ON THE PLAN OF EACH WALL TYPE, AND NOTE AS TYPICAL. 11. SHEET 1.1; WALL TYPES: EXCEPT FOR THE STUD WALLS THAT INDICATE "SPACING PER STRUCTURAL", PLEASE PROVIDE IN THE SCHEDULE THE STUD SPACING FOR ALL WALLS LISTED, OR REFERENCE WHERE THOSE SPACINGS ARE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 12. SHEET 1.1; FLOOR PLAN: PROVIDE AN EXIT SIGN AT THE DOOR S1 IN THE SOUTHWEST STAIR (STAIR S1). 13. SHEET 1.1, FLOOR PLAN: IN THE SOUTHWEST STAIR (STAIR S1), AN OPENING IS INDICATED INTO THE ELEVATOR SHAFT. IS THIS A RATED DOOR? PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLAN. 14. SHEET 1.1; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLAN WHAT IS TO BE STORED IN THE WAREHOUSE, AND/OR HOW THAT SPACE IS TO BE USED. 15. SHEET 1.1; WALL TYPES: THE WALL D, E, AND F ASSEMBLIES MUST BE CONTINUOUS ON BOTH SIDES PER SECTION 707.5 FOR FIRE BARRIERS. SEE SECTION 713 FOR SHAFT ENCLOSURE CONSTRUCTION. THE BATHROOM STAIR AND CORRIDOR SIDES GYPSUM BOARD CAN NOT STOP AT THE CEILING AS NOTED. PLEASE VERIFY. 16. SHEET 1.1; WALL TYPES: PLEASE INDICATE ON WALL G THE GYPSUM BOARD ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STUD WALL MUST EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY TO THE ROOF DECK PER SECTION 707.5. 17. SHEETS 1.1, 1.2, AND 1.3; WALL TYPES: PLEASE INDICATE WHERE WALL TYPE K IS LOCATED ON THE PLANS. 18. SHEET 1.1; WALL TYPES: PLEASE INDICATE ON WALL M THE GYPSUM BOARD ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STUD WALL MUST EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY TO THE ROOF DECK PER SECTION 707.5. 19. SHEET 1.1; WALL TYPES: PLEASE INDICATE ON WALL N THE GYPSUM BOARD ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STUD WALL MUST EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY TO THE ROOF DECK PER SECTION 707.5. 20. SHEET 1.3; FLOOR PLAN: AN ENLARGED STAIR PLAN AT THE ROOF ACCESS INDICATES DETAIL F/1.8. PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL TO D/1.8. 21. SHEET 1.9; ELEVATIONS: SEVERAL ELEVATIONS INDICATE KEYNOTES 13 AND 14. PLEASE PROVIDE THOSE NOTES ON THE PLAN. 22. SHEETS 1.10 AND 1.11; ELEVATONS: PLEASE ADD GRID LINES TO THE ELEVATIONS. 23. SHEET 3; DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DISTANCE FROM THE NEW BUILDING TO THE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ALONG THE NORTH WALL (IN ADDITION TO THE 11' DIMENSION SHOWN). 24. GENERAL: VERIFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1007.3 ARE MET FOR STAIRWAYS, INCLUDING AREA OF REFUGE, TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS, AND SIGNAGE. INDICATE THESE ISSUES ON THE DRAWINGS. 25. SHEET 3.0; STANDARD STRUCTURAL NOTES (GENERAL): NOTE 2G INDICATES A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WAS USED. PLEASE PROVIDE FOR REVIEW. 26. SHEET 5.1 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 18): TWO BEAMS MARKED B1 IN THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRE A W18X35 OR A W18X40. ON THE FRAMING PLAN (ON GRID B), ONE BEAM IS DENOTED AS A W18X40, AND ONE BEAM AS A W12X40 (ANOTHER BEAM ON GRID E IS DENOTED AS A W12X40). PLEASE CLARIFY. 27. SHEET 5.1 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 18): BEAM B9 IN THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRES A W16X26, BUT THE FRAMING PLAN (ON GRID B) INDICATES A W12X30. PLEASE CLARIFY. 28. SHEET 5.1 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 18): BEAM B12 IN THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRES A W18X35, BUT A BEAM DENOTED AS B12 SIM. IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES A W12X26 ON THE FRAMING PLAN (ON GRID E). PLEASE CLARIFY. 29. SHEET 5.2 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 11): BEAM B12 IN THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRES A W18X35, BUT A BEAM DENOTED AS B12 SIM IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES A W12X26 ON THE FRAMING PLAN (ON GRID E). PLEASE CLARIFY. 30. SHEET 5.2 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 16): BEAM B9 IN THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRES A W16X26, BUT THE FRAMING PLAN (ON GRID B) INDICATES A W12X30. PLEASE CLARIFY. 31. SHEET 5.2 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 11): TWO BEAMS MARKED B3 IN THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRE A W21X44. ON THE FRAMING PLAN (ON GRID E), ONE BEAM IS DENOTED AS A W21X44, AND ONE BEAM AS A W12X45. PLEASE CLARIFY. 32. SHEET 5.2 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 11): TWO BEAMS MARKED B1 IN THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRE A W18X35 OR A W18X40. ON THE FRAMING PLAN (ON GRID B), ONE BEAM IS DENOTED AS A W18X40, AND ONE BEAM AS A W12X40 (ANOTHER BEAM ON GRID E IS DENOTED AS A W12X40). PLEASE CLARIFY. 33. SHEET 5.3 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 5): THREE BEAMS MARKED B4 IN THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRE A W16X26. ON THE FRAMING PLAN (ON GRID E), TWO OF THESE BEAMS ARE DENOTED AS W12X26, AND ONE BEAM AS A W16X26. PLEASE CLARIFY. 34. SHEET 5.3 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 8): BEAM B5 IN THE CALCULATIONS REQUIRES A W18X35, BUT THE FRAMING PLAN (ON GRID A) INDICATES A W12X40. PLEASE CLARIFY. 35. GENERAL: PLEASE VERIFY ALL BEAM, COLUMN, AND FOOTING SIZES INDICATED IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE COORDINATED WITH THE SIZES INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. 36. GENERAL: DUE TO THE NUMEROUS ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REVIEW THAT COULD AFFECT THE DRAWINGS, FUTURE REVIEWS COULD RESULT IN ADDITIONAL ISSUES AND COMMENTS. 37. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
04/02/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
04/06/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Horizontal branches shall connect no closer than ten diameters downstream of the bases of vertical stacks. Reference: Section 704.3, IPC 2012. 2. Provide the calculations used to determine the size of the three scuppers, S1, S2, and S3. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012. 3. Verify that the rectangular gutters specified for roof sections B, C, and K are equivalent to the minimum required semi-circular gutters. Reference: Sections 1106.1 and, 1106.6, IPC 2012. 4. Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage for roof sections M, N, and O. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012. |
04/06/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
04/08/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | While the electrical review for the current submittal is approved, due to the potential modifications necessary to address comments associated with the reviews of other disciplines the electrical workflow is denoted as denied in order to verify that those modifications will not adversely impact the electrical review. |
04/08/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show how a continuous layer of insulation (R-4) is to be installed on the roof. Reference: Section 303.2, IECC 2012. 2. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor of the uninsulated doors on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor from Table C303.1.3 (1), IECC 2012. Show the required U-factors for the vertical glazing on the drawings. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IEC 2012. 3. The NFRC certification numbers (CPD#) have not been included in this submittal. Factory-manufactured windows are required to have certificates attesting to their compliance to NFRC Standards 100 and 200 and can be provided by the manufacturer or found at www.nfrc.org. For site assembled commercial products, the NFRC component modeling approach program enables commercial window manufacturers to produce bid reports to prove energy performance prior to being awarded a job and provide finalized label certificates once the product has been installed. Fenestration performance reports based on AAMA 507 are based on energy simulations only (no actual testing) and are not acceptable. 4. Provide the specifications and installation details for the Type II hood being installed in room 137. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC and Section 507.13.5, IMC 2012. |
04/09/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 440 W. Pasep Redondo - Building Plan T15CM01732 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 9, 2015 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans cannot be approved until the development package, DP15-0036, has been approved. 3. Based on the drawing index shown on sheet 1 the drawings are not in the correct order. 4. The development package sheets provided in the building plans will either need to be the approved development package sheets or marked as reference only prior to approval of the building set. 5. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
04/28/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |