Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T15CM01124
Parcel: 115045090

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T15CM01124
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/07/2015 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
07/10/2015 FDILLON1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Approv-Cond Remaining comments must be addressed prior to first building inspection.

HUB 2 DP Comments:1. Approved Proposed Design Package (APDP) Page 6 vs. CD Sheet A3.01:a. North Elevation: Design Package note 10 – Hardie Reveal panel appears to have been replaced with EIFS. i. Key note 19: height of screens have been lowered at ground level.b. West Elevation: APDP Page 10 vs. CD Sheet A3.02 – same as comment 1ai above. i. Key note 18: screen railing shifted slightly.2. APDP page 20 vs. CD Sheet L-1.02:a. Center courtyard shows two less trees on the open end.3. Site Zoning Analysis not in CD set?4. Main Gate Compliance not in CD set?5. Approved LS materials such as shrubs – Euphorbia not shown on CD Sheet L-1.05 list. Some plants on approved design list are not show on the CD set, such as Damianita, Red Yucca. Terrace Trees and Ground Cover vary from approved design.6. Streetscape design vs. CD L1.01a. Slight variation on horizontal drainage, nothing major.7. Mezzanine Terrace Landscaping (Sheet L-1.03) needs to correspond to approved design.8. Central Courtyard plant layout on CD is greatly reduced that shown on approved design layout.9. Revise CD Sheet L-1.03 to reflect approved Design Package layout.10. CD Sheet L-1.04 plant list does not correspond to approved design list.END DP COMMENTS 7/10/15Rick Gonzalez, DP
07/13/2015 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Approved