Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T15CM00727
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/06/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please include IECC compliance on plans. |
| 02/12/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/13/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T15CM00727 RAYTHEON HANGAR C UPGRADE 1. SHEET G0.0; APPLICABLE CODES: THE CURRENT ELECTRICAL CODE USED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON IS THE 2011 EDITION. PLEASE REVISE THE DRAWING. 2. SHEET A0.0; CODE REVIEW: THE ALLOWABLE AREA FOR THE F1 LAB PER THE IBC TABLE 503 APPEARS TO BE DIFFERENT THAN THE VALUE INDICATED ON THE DRAWING. PLEASE VERIFY. 3. SHEET A1.1; ARCHITECTURAL PLAN: A SECTION CUT FROM THE NORTH WALL TO THE SOUTH WALL IS DESIGNATED AS BB/A1.0. PLEASE REVISE THE SHEET REFERENCE. 4. SHEET A1.1; ARCHITECTURAL PLAN: THE SECTION CUTS AA, CC, AND DD ALL REFERENCE SHEET A3.2. PLEASE REVISE THE SHEET REFERENCE. 5. SHEET A1.1; KEYNOTES: IN NOTE 3, PLEASE PROVIDE THE RAMP SLOPE REQUIREMENTS PER THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009, SECTION 405 IN THIS NOTE OR ON THE PLAN. INCLUDE THE SLOPE AND CROSS SLOPE. 6. SHEET A1.1; KEYNOTES: NOTE 6 REFERENCES BUILDING SECTION ON SHEET A2.1. PLEASE REVISE THAT REFERENCE. 7. SHEET A3.0; ELEVATION 1: PLEASE REVISE THE TITLE TO WEST ELEVATION. 8. SHEET A3.1; BUILDING SECTION DD: AN ENLARGED SECTION ON THE RIGHT SIDE REFERENCES A/A1.0. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 9. SHEETS A3.1 AND A3.2; KEYNOTES: PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE TO THE KEYNOTES THAT ALL NUMBERED ITEMS MAY NOT BE INDICATED ON EACH SHEET. 10. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/17/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/17/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/17/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Where is the condensate drain terminating? Condensate drains may not terminate in an area that is not capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Provide the basis used to determine the amount of ventilation required for the program space. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2012. 4. Clarify the nature of the thermostatic control, i.e. is it programmable with the features required by Section C403.2.4.2, IFGC, 2012. 5. Provide justification for having thermostat set points with less than a 5-degree Fahrenheit deadband. Reference: Section C403.2.4.2, IECC 2012. |