Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM06286
Parcel: 115045090

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T14CM06286
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/25/2015 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Hub II
T14CM06286
Building Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 25, 2015

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and it appears that they comply with development package DP14-0145. Zoning will not approve until all PDSD review agencies have approved the foundation plan.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
03/25/2015 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4; SHEET S3.01 (DETAIL 112): THE SUMP PIT IN THE ELEVATOR PIT AS DISCUSSED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IS REFERENCED IN NOTE 8 OF DETAIL 112, BUT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE DETAIL. PLEASE VERIFY.
2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: WITH THE INCLUSION OF THE POOL LOADS IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS, HAVE THE LATERAL (SEISMIC) CALCULATIONS INCLUDED THAT LOADING? PLEASE VERIFY.
3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 13A: WE AGREE THAT THE ACTUAL TOTAL SF OF THE FIRST FLOOR MEZZANINE FALLS UNDER THE ALLOWABLE SF PER THE IBC SECTION 505.2.1. HOWEVER, THE IBC SECTION 505.2.3 , EXCEPTION 2, CONCERNING THE OPENNESS, IS QUESTIONABLE AS TO WHETHER THOSE CRITERIA ARE MET. THE UNITS IN THE NORTH AREA (UNITS M01 THROUGH M05) MEET THE OPENNESS CRITERIA BY HAVING TWO MEANS OF EGRESS, ONE OF WHICH PROVIDES DIRECT ACCESS TO AN EXIT FROM THE MEZZANINE LEVEL. THE UNITS ON THE EAST SIDE (UNITS 001 THROUGH 003) ALL HAVE ONLY ONE MEANS OF EGRESS FROM THE MEZZANINE LEVEL AND THUS DO NOT QUALITY THAT LEVEL FOR EXCEPTION 2 OF THE OPENNESS REQUIREMENT. THIS ISSUE REMAINS AND COULD AFFECT THE FOUNDATION DESIGN.
4. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
04/02/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The response to this comment states that the finished floor elevation of the 1st floor "22.98" but this note was not found on the submitted drawings. The sub-level 2 garage however is noted as being 3'-8" below the first floor and has area drains that ultimately discharge to the sanitary sewer system. Clarify how this is to be resolved. [Initial comment: According to the civil plans, the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is 2421.8'and some areas of the first floor may be lower than or less than 12" above the manhole rim elevation. Provide a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. Verify that no fixtures located on floor levels above the first floor discharge through the backwater valve.]