Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM04928
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/04/2014 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ENG can not approve the building plan until approval of the associated Development Plan Package, DP14-0129 |
| 08/12/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET S0.1; DESIGN CRITERIA (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE 1 INDICATES THE FOUNDATION WAS DESIGNED USING A SOIL REPORT. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 2. SHEET S0.1 (DESIGN CRITERIA); SHEET S1.0 (FOOTING SCHEDULE): IT APPEARS FOOTINGS F2 AND F3 (FOUR TOTAL) ON GRID LINE E ARE 24" DEEP FROM THE TOP OF THE SLAB TO THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING. THIS WOULD NOT FOLLOW THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE DESIGN CRITERIA NOTES (2'-0" BELOW THE LOWEST ADJACENT FINISHED GRADE). CLARIFY. 3. SHEET S1.0 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE FOOTINGS AT 1A, 1D, 2A, 2D, 8A, AND 8D ARE 4'-6" SQUARE X 14" THICK, WHILE THE FOUNDATION PLAN INDICATES THOSE FOOTINGS (F4) ARE 4'-6" SQUARE X 12" DEEP. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: PROVIDE A DETAIL ON SHEET S1.0 FOR AN INTERIOR FRAME FOOTING (F1 AT 6D OR 7D), OR REFERENCE SECTION 2/A3.0. 5. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE FOOTINGS AT 6B, 7B, AND 5B (SIM). WHERE ARE THESE FOOTINGS ON THE PLAN? 6. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: REVISE THE EASTERN BUILDING SECTION REFERENCE TO A/A3.0 (INDICATES B/A3.0 AT SOUTH WALL). 7. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET A1.0 (FLOOR PLAN): PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FROM THE NEW GRID LINE 8 TO THE EXISTING GRID 9 (PER SHEET A1.0). 8. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: ARE THE NEW COLUMN FOOTINGS AT 8A AND 8D IN CONFLICT WITH THE EXISTING FOOTINGS ON GRID 9? VERIFY. 9. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION KEY NOTES: NOTES 10 AND 14 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 10. SHEET S2.0; DETAIL 17: THERE IS A 6" (TYP) DIMENSION INDICATED FROM THE SIDE OF THE CONCRETE PIER. WHAT IS THAT 6" MEASURED TO? VERIFY. 11. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: A NOTE AT THE EAST WALL (AND SECTION 4/A3.0) INDICATES A TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL. IF THE PURPOSE OF THE FIRE WALL IS TO SEPARATE THE SPACES TO MEET AREA LIMITATIONS, THE IBC SECTION 508.4.4.1 INDICATES THE REQUIRED SEPARATIONS SHALL BE FIRE BARRIERS. PER TABLE 707.3.10, THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING FOR THE FIRE BARRIER ASSEMBLIES IN F-1 OCCUPANCY GROUPS SHALL BE THREE HOURS. VERIFY. 12. SHEET A1.0; DOOR SCHEDULE: REVISE THE FIRE RATING FOR DOORS 100D AND 100E AS REQUIRED. 13. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: REVISE THE EASTERN BUILDING SECTION REFERENCE TO A/A3.0 (INDICATES B/A3.0 AT THE SOUTH WALL). 14. SHEET A1.0; HARDWARE SCHEDULE: REVISE THE FIRE RATING FOR HARDWARE SETS 1 AND 3 AS REQUIRED. 15. SHEET A3.0; SECTION 4: REVISE THE FIRE RATING FOR THE WALL AS REQUIRED. 16. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/19/2014 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Approval of DP14-0129 is required. |
| 08/21/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify that the addition to the building will not be conditioned or will have no more than 1 Watt per square foot used to condition the building. Reference: Section C101.5.2, IECC 2012. 2. Verify that the exhaust duct for the paint booth is more than 10-feet from operable openings in the building. Reference: Section 501.3.1 (1), IMC 2012. 3. Clarify the location of the exhaust discharge (flue?) from the oven. Reference: Section 501.3.1 (1), IMC 2012. 4. Clarify the termination of the flue for the pressure washer. Reference: Section 503.6.4, IFGC 2012. |
| 08/21/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the water pipe sizing chart to limit the water velocity to 8 FPS or less (e.g. 15 GPM in a ¾" Type L copper tube has a velocity of 9.9 FPS). Reference: Section 303.2, IPC 2012. 2. Clarify the source of the water demand calculations. The pressure washer is not a plumbing fixture and would not normally be assigned a fixture unit value. Under the methods shown in the IPC, hose bibbs do not have an assigned fixture unit value, just a minimum flow rate of 5 GPM as a design criterion. Provide the manufacturer's flow rate data for the pressure washer. What is the demand associated with the oven and the holding tank? Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2012. 3. Show how water is connected to the holding tank and to the oven. Show how any possible cross-contamination is prevented. Reference: Section 608.1, IPC 2012. 4. Clarify how the sump pump is associated with the plumbing system. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC and Section 712, IPC 2012. 5. Show the dimensions and slope for the rain water gutters. Reference: Sections 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012. |
| 08/21/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/22/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/26/2014 | AROMERO4 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 08/26/2014 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/26/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |