Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T14CM03879
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/15/2014 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/15/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the envelope compliance calculation to agree with the building shown on the drawings. Explain how the warehouse is to have 70% daylighting. [Initial comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. Revise the mechanical compliance certificate to agree with the design shown on the plans. Note that the unit "kBTU/h" is read "thousands of BTU/h". [Initial comment: Show that the mechanical systems comply with the requirements of Sections C403.2, C403.3 and, if neither the efficient lighting system nor the on-site renewable energy options are selected, C406.2, IECC 2012 (e.g. provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification from COMcheck). Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 3. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Coordinate the mechanical keynotes (e.g. #2 and #4) with the mechanical plan.] |
| 07/15/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/15/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/15/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide automatic faucets for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 2. Provide a section showing how the T&P relief is to be routed. [Initial comment: Clarify the termination of the T&P relief piping for the water heater (i.e. how will it be able to terminate at least 6" above grade?). Reference: Section 504, IPC 2012.] 3. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Clarify the size of the water service to the building. The site plan shows a ½" service from the meter and the plumbing drawings call for a 1" service. Based on the water demand, calculated using Appendix E, IPC 2012, the minimum size of the water service should be 1-1/4" to avoid a velocity in excess of 8 feet per second and to conform to the water pressure calculations shown on sheet P-1.] 4. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Clarify the size of the building drain and the building sewer; it is shown as being both 3" and 4" on sheets P-1 and P-2.] |
| 07/15/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Coordinate with the site utility drawing. [Initial comment: Clarify the size of the water meter being used to serve this building; it is a ¾" meter on the site plan (sheet 3 of 9) but 1" on sheet P-1.] |
| 07/23/2014 | SPOWELL1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review |