Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T14CM01365
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLEASE FIX COVER SHEET WITH THE CORRECT OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION (SHOWN AS TWO DIFFERENT TYPES) AND RE CALCULATE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE BUILDING. THE ENTIRE USE IS NOT OFFICE. |
| 06/04/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Shadow Pines Apartments T14CM00785, T14CM01365, T14CM03157, T14CM03158, T14CM03159, T14CM03160, T14CM03161, T14CM03162, T14CM03163, T14CM03164, T14CM03165, T14CM03166 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 30, 2014 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until a development package has been approved by all PDSD agencies for the site changes. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 06/10/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shown on the drawings shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the fenestration components, along with the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012. |
| 06/10/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. A community center is an A-3 occupancy, not an R-2 occupancy. Provide the number and type of plumbing fixtures required by Table 2902.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide material standards for all plumbing fixtures being provided by others. Reference: Sections 303.4 and 402, IPC 2012. 3. The restroom is not under the control of an individual or a family therefore it is a public restroom. Provide an automatic faucet for the lavatory, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Verify that the existing 4" building sewer can accommodate the additional drainage fixture units from the proposed community building (i.e. provide the slope and fixture load of the existing building sewer). Reference: section 710.1, IPC 2012. 5. Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage for the roof areas utilizing scuppers as the primary roof drains. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012. |
| 06/10/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET TS1; CODE ANALYSIS DATA: REMOVE THE ADA REFERENCE FROM THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE, AND REVISE THE ICC/ANSI TO THE 2009 EDITION. 2. SHEET TS1; CODE STUDY: THE USE OF THIS BUILDING DOES NOT FALL UNDER R-2 RESIDENTIAL. THE IBC SECTION 303.4 CLASSIFIES THE OCCUPANCY AS AN A-3 (COMMUNITY HALL). REVISE. 3. SHEET TS1; CODE STUDY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO TABLE 1016.1 FOR THE SPRINKLERS. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS ARE FOUND IN THE IBC SECTION 903.2.1.3 FOR A-3 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONS. THERE IS NO TABLE 1016.1 IN THE 2012 IBC. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 4. SHEET TS1; CODE STUDY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO TABLE 803.5 FOR FLAME SPREAD RATINGS. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC. 5. SHEET TS1; CODE STUDY: REVISE THE ALLOWABLE AREA FOR AN A-3 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS LISTED IN TABLE 503. 6. SHEET TS1; CODE STUDY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO TABLE 1014.1 FOR OCCUPANT LOADS. THERE IS NO TABLE 1014.1 IN THE 2012 IBC. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 7. SHEET TS1; CODE STUDY: REVISE THE OCCUPANCY LOAD TO THE A-3 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. 8. SHEET TS1; CODE STUDY: REFERENCE IS MADE TO TABLES 1005.1 AND 1014.1. REVISE THE REFERENCES AND THE EXIT WIDTH REQUIRED FOR THE REVISED OCCUPANCY LOAD. 9. SHEET TS1; DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: REFERENCE IS MADE TO SECTION 103.3.4.2 FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC. 10. SHEET TS1; SHEET INDEX: CHANGE SHEET S4.0 TO FOUNDATION AND FRAMING DETAILS. 11. SHEET TS1; CODE STUDY: PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS ON THIS SHEET FOR THE REQUIRED PLUMBING FIXTURES PER THE IBC TABLE 2902.1. 12. SHEET A1.0; BUILDING PLAN: KEY NOTE 15.7 INDICATES A BOTTLED WATER LOCATION. A HIGH/LOW DRINKING FOUNTAIN OR A SINGLE POINT-OF-USE DISPENSER (DIRECT CONNECTION TO WATER LINE) ARE ALLOWED. REVISE AND ADD TO THE PLUMBING DRAWINGS. 13. SHEET A1.0; PARTITION TYPES: WALL 6A DOES NOT INDICATE IF THE TOP OF THE PARTITION EXTENDS TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE, OR STOPS ABOVE THE CEILING. ADD TO THE NOTE. 14. SHEET A1.0; PARTITION TYPES: PROVIDE DETAILS AS REQUIRED TO INDICATE THE CONNECTION OF THE TOP OF THE PARTITIONS TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE FOR WALLS 4A, 6A, AND 6D. 15. SHEET A1.0 (BUILDING PLAN); BUILDING ELEVATIONS: THE ELEVATION TITLES INDICATE DIRECTIONS (N, S, E, AND W) INCONSISTENT WITH THE BUILDING PLAN. VERIFY. 16. SHEET A1.0; BUILDING PLAN: THE ELEVATION REFERENCE 3B/A6.1 IN THE COMMUNITY ROOM IS INCORRECT. THERE IS NO SHEET A6.1. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 17. SHEET A1.2; DETAIL 4: PROVIDE A DETAIL TITLE. 18. SHEET A1.2; BUILDING SECTION KEY NOTES: NOTES 5.1 AND 7.7 ARE NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTION. VERIFY. 19. SHEET A1.2; DETAIL 6: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL VERBIAGE. 20. SHEET A1.2; DETAIL 6: REFERENCE IS MADE TO DETAILS 6B/A2.1 AND 6C/A2.1. REVISE THE REFERENCES. 21. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE 1 REFERENCES THE IBC TABLE 1804.2 FOR ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC. 22. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE): NOTE 19 REFERENCES THE IBC SECTION 1905 FOR CONCRETE QUALITY ASSURANCE. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC. 23. SHEET S1.1; STRUCTURAL NOTES (POST INSTALLED ANCHORS): NOTE 10 REFERENCES THE 2006 IBC. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 24. SHEET S1.4; DETAIL 23: NOTE 2 BELOW THE SCHEDULE REFERENCES THE 2006 IBC. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 25. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 80): DF2 IN THE CALCULATIONS IS A 2'X2'X12" FOOTING, WHILE SHEET S2.0 INDICATES ONLY A 1'-4" WALL FOOTING AT THOSE LOCATIONS. CLARIFY. 26. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: IS THE DETAIL 105 CUT AT AN INTERIOR WALL CORRECT? VERIFY. 27. SHEET S3.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 5 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 28. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/10/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/23/2014 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/23/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/23/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |