Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T14CM01004
Parcel: 13705168A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T14CM01004
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/21/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
02/25/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Cleanfreak $3 Carwash
T14CM01004
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 25, 2014

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve until the development package has been approved for the site change

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
02/25/2014 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Building plan will be approved upon approval of the DP14-0029. JG
03/03/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET a0.1: PROVIDE ON THE DRAWINGS INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE, OCCUPANCY GROUP, OCCUPANCY LOAD, AND PLUMBING FIXTURES (WATER CLOSETS, LAVATORIES, DRINKING FOUNTAINS) REQUIRED PER THE 2012 IBC.
2. SHEET a1.1; DETAIL 3: A NOTE INDICATES 'MOUNTING HEIGHT PER CITY REQUIREMENTS'. REPLACE THAT NOTE WITH A 7'-0" DIMENSION.
3. SHEET a1.1; DETAIL 8: AT THE BASE OF THE LADDER, PROVIDE A MINIMUM EMBEDMENT LENGTH OF THE 3/8" DIAMETER EXPANSION BOLT INTO THE CONCRETE.
4. SHEET a1.1; DETAILS 6 AND 7: ON BOTH DETAILS, A REFERENCE IS MADE ON THE MASONRY SCREEN WALLS' PER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS'. CHANGE THAT TO 'PER STRUCTURAL DESIGN, SHEET s3.2, DETAIL 115'.
5. SHEET a1.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE PLAN AND DETAILS 1, 2, 3, AND 10.
6. SHEET a2.0; FLOOR PLAN: A DETAIL INDICATOR AT THE NEW PAY CANOPY IS ILLEGIBLE. REVISE.
7. SHEET a2.0; FLOOR PLAN: IS THE GLASS WALL ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING PROTECTED PER SECTION 716 OF THE IBC? VERIFY AND PROVIDE GLAZING INFORMATION ON THE DRAWINGS.
8. SHEET a2.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DOOR SCHEDULE AND WINDOW ELEVATION 4.
9. SHEET a6.0; ELEVATION 5: A REFERENCE TO ANSI 1109.2 FOR THE PARAPHENALIA SHELF IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
10. SHEET a6.0; ELEVATIONS 3 AND 4: A REFERENCE TO THE IBC 1210.1 FOR THE COVE BASE IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
11. SHEET s1.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES.
12. SHEET s2.1: PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED PLAN FOR THE LAYOUT OF WALLS, COLUMNS, AND FOOTINGS.
13. SHEET s2.2 (JOIST SPAN SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 7): REVIEW THE JOIST SIZES LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE. UP TO AN 8' SPAN REQUIRES A 6", 20 GAUGE SECTION, OR A 10", 18 GAUGE SECTION, OR A 12", 16 GAUGE SECTION. VERIFY THAT THE DEEPER SECTION REQUIRES A HEAVIER GAUGE FOR THE SAME SPAN.
14. SHEET s2.2 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 13): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE TWO NORTH BEAMS OF THIS EAST CANOPY TO BE TS 12X12X3/16, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES THE BEAMS (B2) TO BE TS 12X6X3/16. CLARIFY. IP APPEARS THE COMPUTER ANALYSIS LISTS THOSE BEAMS AS 12X6X3/16.
15. SHEET s2.2; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: A NOTE ON THE PLAN CONCERNING THE HATCHED AREA OF THE ROOF SHOULD INCLUDE VERBIAGE TO REFERENCE SHEET a2.2 FOR THE ROOF SLOPE.
16. SHEET s2.2 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET s4.1 (DETAIL 211): THIS DETAIL SHOULD INCLUDE THE APPLICABLE ROOF COVERING (STEEL JOISTS, CONCRETE ON STEEL DECK, FABRIC) AND THE TRANSITION OF ONE MATERIAL TO ANOTHER.
17. SHEET s3.1; DETAIL 111: NOTE 7 IS INDICATED IN TWO SEPARATE LOCATIONS ON THE DETAIL. REVISE.
18. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE A KEY PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MASONRY WALL LOCATIONS AS THEY RELATE TO THE CALCULATIONS.
19. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE A KEY PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE WALL FOOTING LOCATIONS AS THEY RELATE TO THE CALCULATIONS.
20. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
03/04/2014 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
03/11/2014 KEN VAN KARSEN ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change T14CM01004

1. Clarify the location of items 18-C & 33-D overtyped upon the HVAC Elect Requirements schedule on sheet #e3.0.

2. Clarify the breaker rating difference between the panel schedule and one line diagram for 15-A.

3. City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code (Ord #10963) compliance: Show the correct lighting budget based fixture style "Option 2" (Table 401.1) on sheet #e2.2. The ordinance requires a maximum of 250,000 lumens.

Ken Van Karsen
Elect Plan Review
PDSD, City of Tucson
520-837-4912
Kenneth.VanKarsen@tucsonaz.gov
03/19/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Provide the civil drawings that show the construction requirements for the water service to the building, revisions to the building sewer, and the installation of the sand/oil interceptor. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Provide structural calculations and details to show how the proposed water heater support is to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012.
4. Provide tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks in restrooms using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.
5. Provide automatic faucets for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
6. Clarify why hot water is not being supplied to the service sink (SS). Reference: Section 607.1, IPC 2012.
7. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
03/19/2014 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
03/20/2014 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012.
3. Verify that the specified controls provide the capabilities noted in the COMcheck Generic Requirements #5 and #6 on sheet M2.0. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/28/2014 AROMERO4 APPROVAL SHELF Completed
03/28/2014 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/28/2014 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed