Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 1ST
Permit Number - T13CM07532
Review Name: REVISION - - 1ST
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/05/2014 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION KEYNOTES); DETAIL 101: KEYNOTE 2 INDICATES A NEW COLUMN WITH AN ATTACHMENT TO THE EXISTING POST OF A 1/4" X 1/2" LONG FILLET WELD AT 12" O.C., WHILE DETAIL 101 INDICATES A 1/4" X 1 1/2" LONG FILLET WELD AT 12" O.C. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET S2.0 (DETAIL 101); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 1): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A GRADE BEAM 2'-6" WIDE X 5'-0" DEEP, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES A 1'-4" WIDE X 2'-0" DEEP FOUNDATION WALL WITH A 3'-6" WIDE X 1'-6" DEEP FOOTING. CLARIFY. 3. SHEET S2.0 (DETAIL 102); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 1): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 3'-0" DIAMETER CAISSON, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES A 3'-6" DIAMETER. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET S2.0 (DETAIL 102); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 1): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A HSS8X8X1/4 POST, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES A HSS8X8X1/2. CLARIFY. 5. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/06/2014 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/06/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |