Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T13CM05792
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/25/2013 | ELEIBOL1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Engineering will review once site plan is reviewed and at a stage when proposed foot print is acceptable. Keep in mind that roof drainage should be adequately addressed on building plan set - as well as shown on site plan (flow directions and splash pads etc.). |
| 10/28/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 5901 S, Park Avenue T13CM05791 & T13CM05792 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: Ovtober 28, 2013 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 3. Until the development package has been submitted approved the building plans cannot be approved. 4. At this time a development package has not been submitted therefore the building plans cannot be compared to the development package to ensure compliance. 5. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 11/06/2013 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/15/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Correct the code analysis on sheet G100 to show the 2012 IPC as the governing code for this activity. [Initial comment: The 2012 International Plumbing Code has been adopted by the City of Tucson. The use of the 2012 Uniform Plumbing Code (See Code Analysis on G100) is allowed provided an appeal to the building official is filed. There is no charge for this appeal. This review has been done using the 2012 IPC.] 2. Comment not resolved. No site plan showing the requested site utilities has been included with this submittal. Note that an approved development plan or grading permit is not a substitute for a building permit to install site utilities. Reference: Sections 104.2 and 107.1, IBC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of its connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 11/15/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not resolved. No site plan showing the requested site utilities has been included with this submittal. Note that an approved development plan or grading permit is not a substitute for a building permit to install site utilities. Reference: Sections 104.2 and 107.1, IBC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 11/18/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Complete the Envelope Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 3, the Air Leakage, Component Certification, and Vapor Retarder Requirements. Supporting documentation shall be either on the drawings or in the project manual. ] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/19/2013 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/19/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |