Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T13CM05792
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/24/2013 | RONALD BROWN | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 09/24/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 5901 S, Park Avenue T13CM05791 & T13CM05792 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 24, 2013 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 3. Until the development package has been submitted approved the building plans cannot be approved. 4. At this time a development package has not been submitted therefore the building plans cannot be compared to the development package to ensure compliance. 5. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 09/24/2013 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET G100 1. Provide total square footage analysis for each building. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS 2. Provide foundation key plans, floor framing key plans and roof framing key plans for both buildings. 3. Provide structural calculations for the following: a. Light pole foundation. b. All roof top mounted HVAC eqyupment for both buildings. SHEET A120 4. At detail 1, provide a hi/lo water dispenser. SHEET S0.1 5. Provide certifications for all special inspectors as required by the 2012 IBC, Division 16 and this sheet. SITE PLAN 6. Please provide a site plan. END OF REVIEW. |
| 09/25/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/01/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 10/02/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Complete the Envelope Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 3, the Air Leakage, Component Certification, and Vapor Retarder Requirements. Supporting documentation shall be either on the drawings or in the project manual. 2. Revise the Mechanical Compliance Certificate to apply to the community building only. 3. Clarify the HVAC controls; do the controls labeled AC-1 and AC-2 refer to HP-1 and HP-2? 4. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains for heat pumps HP-1 and HP-2. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/02/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The 2012 International Plumbing Code has been adopted by the City of Tucson. The use of the 2012 Uniform Plumbing Code (See Code Analysis on G100) is allowed provided an appeal to the building official is filed. There is no charge for this appeal. This review has been done using the 2012 IPC. 2. Provide site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of its connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. Specify the piping materials to be employed in this activity. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 4. Provide open-front water closet seats. Reference: Section 420.3, IPC 2012. 5. Provide a detail showing the hot water recirculation system, the temperature and pressure relief, the thermal expansion tank, and the shut off valves for the water heater, WH-7. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 6. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/03/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/15/2013 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Engineering will review once site plan is reviewed and at a stage when proposed foot print is acceptable. Keep in mind that roof drainage should be adequately addressed on building plan set - as well as shown on site plan (flow directions and splash pads etc.). |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/24/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |