Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T13CM05791
Parcel: 140253300

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T13CM05791
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/24/2013 RONALD BROWN COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed
09/24/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 5901 S, Park Avenue
T13CM05791 & T13CM05792
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 24, 2013

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

3. Until the development package has been submitted approved the building plans cannot be approved.

4. At this time a development package has not been submitted therefore the building plans cannot be compared to the development package to ensure compliance.

5. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
09/24/2013 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SHEET G100
1. Provide total square footage analysis for each building.
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
2. Provide foundation key plans, floor framing key plans and roof framing key plans for both buildings.
3. Provide structural calculations for the following:
a. Light pole foundation.
b. All roof top mounted HVAC eqyupment for both buildings.
SHEET A120
4. At detail 1, provide a hi/lo water dispenser.
SHEET S0.1
5. Provide certifications for all special inspectors as required by the 2012 IBC, Division 16 and this sheet.
SITE PLAN
6. Please provide a site plan.
END OF REVIEW.
09/25/2013 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/30/2013 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
10/01/2013 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the Mechanical Compliance Certificate to apply to the apartment building only. (Note: see also exception 2, Section C408.2, IECC 2012.)
2. Clarify the specification for auxiliary heating controls for the heat pumps which have no auxiliary heat. Reference: Sections 301 and 304.1, IMC 2012.
3. Provide structural calculations and details to show how the fan coil units are to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.
4. Verify the size of the condensate drains for the fan coils (shown as being 1-1/4" for 1.5 and 2-ton heat pumps). Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
5. Condensate drains may not decrease in size in the direction of flow. Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2012.
6. Detail 102 shows primary and secondary condensate drains for the fan coils. Show the location for the termination of the secondary condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2.3 IMC 2012.
7. Detail 108 calls for a 4" PVC flue with a wall termination for all of the gas-fired water heaters. The specified water heaters have an 80% thermal efficiency and require a draft hood and approved metal vent pipes. Show the water heaters being installed per the manufacturer's instructions. Reference: Sections 301 and 304.1, IMC 2012 and Sections 503 and 503.6.4, IFGC 2012.
8. Show how the clothes dryer exhaust ducts will be terminated. Reference: Section 504.4, IMC 2012.
9. Provide signage indicating the total equivalent lengths of the concealed dryer exhaust ducts. Reference: Section 504.6.5, IMC 2012.
10. Provide independent ventilation or an independent air conditioning system for the elevator machine rooms. Reference: Section 3006.2, IBC 2012.
10/01/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The 2012 International Plumbing Code has been adopted by the City of Tucson. The use of the 2012 Uniform Plumbing Code (See Code Analysis on G100) is allowed provided an appeal to the building official is filed. There is no charge for this appeal. This review has been done using the 2012 IPC.
2. Provide site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of its connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Specify the piping materials to be employed in this activity. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
4. Provide floor drains for the central clothes washing facilities per Section 412.4, IPC 2012 (the minimum size shall be 3").
5. Provide a watertight pan of galvanized steel (minimum 24-gage) or other approved material under each water heater with a drain to an approved location. Reference: Section 504.7, IPC 2012.
6. Revise the water distribution system design criteria to account for the actual static lift to the highest fixture outlet. Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
7. Provide calculations to show how the size of the thermal expansion tanks for water heaters WH-1 through WH-6 was determined. Reference: section 607.3, IPC 2012.
8. Horizontal branches shall connect no closer than ten diameters downstream of the bases of stacks. Reference: Section 704.3, IPC 2012.
9. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
10. Provide calculations to support the scupper design or provide structural calculations to show that the roof is capable of supporting the additional rain load. Table 1106.3, IPC 2012 is intended for determining the size of horizontal storm drainage pipes running full, not for designing scuppers. Reference: Section 1106, IPC 2012 and Section 1611.1, IBC 2012.
10/03/2013 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
10/15/2013 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Engineering will review once site plan is reviewed and at a stage when proposed foot print is acceptable. Keep in mind that roof drainage should be adequately addressed on building plan set - as well as shown on site plan (flow directions and splash pads etc.).

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/24/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed