Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T13CM02748
Parcel: 115044900

Address:
1031 N PARK AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T13CM02748
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/13/2013 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
05/16/2013 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied STRUCTURAL REVIEW BY ERIC NEWCOMB:
1. SHEETS S104, S105, S108, AND S110A; POST-TENSION DESIGN: A NOTE AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS BOX IS NOT COMPLETE. PROVIDE SHEET REFERENCE.
2. SHEET S106; LEVEL 10 FRAMING PLAN: IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER, A NOTE 11 IS INCORRECT. REVISE.
3. SHEET S106 (LEVEL 10 FRAMING PLAN); SHEET NOTE 1: IS THERE A SECTION OR REFERENCE NOTE INDICATING THE REINFORCING IN THE 8" WALL? VERIFY AND PROVIDE (PER THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHEET PD2).
4. SHEET S106; FRAMING PLAN: NEAR GRIDS 5 AND A, THERE ARE SECTIONS 265, 265A, AND 266 CUT. ARE THESE CORRECT AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN? VERIFY.
5. SHEET S109 (LEVEL 13 FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE NORTH PORTION OF THE SLAB IS DESIGNED PER LEVELS 3 THROUGH 8 (S104), BUT NO DESIGN WAS FOUND FOR THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE SLAB (BELOW GRID 3). VERIFY.
6. SHEET S108; FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL 260 CUT NEAR GRIDS 1 AND E INDICATES TO SEE THE PLAN FOR THE HSS (ON SHEET S407). THE NOTE FOR THE HSS SIZE SHOULD BE REFERENCED TO SHEET S104, SHEET NOTE 7. VERIFY.
7. SHEET S110; ELEVATOR ROOF PLAN: NOTE 8 REFERENCES DETAIL 274 FOR SUPPORT. IS THIS THE CORRECT REFERENCE DETAIL? VERIFY.
8. SHEET S402; DETAIL 213: SHOULD THE COLUMN IN THIS DETAIL HAVE THE SAME NOTE AS DETAIL 211 PERTAINING TO THE TOP OF THE CONCRETE COLUMN? VERIFY.
9. SHEET S403; DETAIL 227: INDICATE NOTE 4 ON THE DETAIL.
10. SHEET S407; DETAIL 258: REVISE NOTE 3.
11. SHEET S407; DETAIL 262: NOTE 4 INDICATES 3-#7 TOP, WHILE THE DETAIL SHOWS 2. CLARIFY.
12. SHEET S407; DETAIL 265: NOTES 5 AND 6 SHOULD BE SWITCHED ON THE DETAIL. VERIFY.
13. SHEET S408; DETAIL 273: NOTE 4 IS NOT INDICATED ON THE DETAIL. PROVIDE.
14. SHEET S501; DETAIL 2: NOTE 3 IS LISTED TWICE. REVISE.
15. SHEET S501 (PLAN 6); SHEET S502 (DETAIL 8): THE PLAN INDICATES A CONCRETE BEAM BELOW (NOTE 2), WHILE THE DETAIL ONLY INDICATES A WALL. CLARIFY.
16. SHEET S501; PLAN 7: NOTES 1 AND 2 SHOULD BE SWITCHED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
17. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS WILL NOT BE PERFORMED WITHOUT RESPONSES.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BY RON BROWN:
COVER SHEET
18. City of Tucson minimum lettering height standards is 3/32” for both upper and lower case. Please revise this sheet and resubmit.
SHEET G000
19. Building Code Data; Building Info: The gross floor area is not the same as shown on sheet G003. Please revise and resubmit.
SHEET G002
20. Up date you accessible signage detail and delete the detail showing the sign mounted in the middle of the door.
SHEET G003
21. Reference comment 1; revise sheet and resubmit.
22. Under the Code Data summary:
a. Coordinate the gross building s.f. with sheet G000.
b. Fix the Actual Floor Area number alignment.
23. Further clarify and explain “Occupancy Separation 508.4: Not Required”.
24. Provide total occupancy load.
SHEET G005
25. Reference Comment 1, revise and resubmit.
SHEET A101
26. At detail 3, the Van Accessible width dimensions must be 11’ with a 5’ aisle or 8’ with an 8’ aisle. Revise and resubmit.
27. Indicate 2% maximum slope in all directions for all accessible parking spaces and aisles.
SHEET A103
28. Rooms 203 and 207 are indicated as TYPE “A”. This would give you a total of 6 accessible Type “A” rooms. These two are not on the Accessible Type “A” Room Schedule shown on sheet G003.
SHEET A106
29. Even though the pool and spa are to be under a separate contract, please provide for accessible access to both as required by the 2009 Edition ICC A117.1, Section 1109.
SHEET A201
30. The Study Room 226 requires two exits due to occupancy load being about 50n as calculated per table 1004.1.2 at 15 s.f. per person.
SHEET A600, A601 AND 602
31. Show the 1’0” handrail extension on all floor plan and stair section.
SHEET A603
32. At detail 2, dimension the handrail extension and provide a handrail extension detail at the bottom of the stairs.
SHEET A700
33. As required by the 2012 IBC, Section 1008.1.10, provide panic bars on all required exist doors.
END OF REVIEW
05/28/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify the design of the cold water distribution system. The water leaves the booster pump room in a 6" pipe and runs on level P2 to a location near column A-4.5 where it rises. The pipe is not shown on level L1 and the riser diagrams do not show any 6" cold water pipes occurring until the 8th level. The riser diagram covering levels 2, 3, and 4 shows no cold water pipe rising from the levels below. In addition, the boiler detail on sheet P310 shows a 6" cold water pipe feeding the boilers on the roof but only hot water is shown leaving the roof.
2. Provide a cleanout at the base of each waste stack. Reference: Section 708.3.4, IPC 2012.
3. Provide cleanouts sized for the nominal size of pipes that they serve up to 4-inches. Reference: Section 708.7, IPC 2012.
4. The maximum number of fixture units for a horizontal branch (not a building drain) shall not exceed that shown in Table 710.1 (2), IPC 2012 (e.g. riser number 49).
5. Provide a relief vent for stacks greater than ten branch intervals in height. Reference: Section 908, IPC 2012.
6. Revise the roof drain calculations to include the effect of any vertical walls that can divert rainfall onto the roof. Reference: Section 1106.4, IPC 2012.
7. Clarify the roof drainage for the section of roof centered at column E-1.5; the architectural sections appear to show a raised parapet that that blocks runoff from portions of the roof from reaching the roof drain and overflow drain. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012, and Section 101.2, IPC 2012.
8. Provide the dimensions for the scupper draining the elevator roof. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
9. Clarify the routing of the roof drain leaders that begin on the 10th level near A-5.5 (820 SF, 3" dia.) and near column B-5.5 (1025 SF, 3" dia.). The leaders disappear on the 8th level and do not reappear until the 2nd level. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
10. Clarify the area served by the roof drain leader that begins near column D-5.5 on the 10th level. On levels 10 through 3, it drains 1900 SF of roof area but on level 2 it is shown as draining 2110 SF of roof area. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
11. Show the slope of the horizontal roof drain leader that terminates near column A-4 on level 1. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
12. Revise the size of the natural gas pipe serving the fire pit per Table 402.4 (2). Reference: Section 402.4, IFGC 2012.
13. If the manufacturer does not incorporate a sediment trap within the gas-fired equipment, provide a sediment trap as close to the equipment as possible. Reference: Section 408.4, IFGC 2012.
05/28/2013 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T13CM02748
1031 N Park
Park Ave Student Housing

1. Provide a calculation showing compliance with current (2012) City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code, Ord #10963.
2. Sheet E308, add Exit Light at hallway intersection NW of Elect Room # 1223.
3. Sheet E309, add Exit Light at hallway intersection NW of Elect Room # 1322.
4. Sheet E401, General Residential Note #6, "per 210.11.C.2
requirement for dedicated 20 amp laundry circuit", how will this be taken care off ?
5. Sheet E403, lighting required in front of or adjacent to Panels, per 110.26.D., check all units for compliance.
6. Sheet E500, Emergency Generator termination of Fire Pump Feeder, there is no disconnect , required per 225.31 and 445.18 ?
7. Sheet E602, Panel 10EL circuit listed as spare, used on Sheet E306 for lighting.
8. Sheet E602, Panel 10DP va values for 75KVA transformer for phase A,B and C do not correspond with the va values of Panel 10PA for phases A,B and C ?
9. Are the Meters being provided in the Electrical Rooms for units Utilitiy or Private ?
10. Provide a total square footage of residential units only, (to be used for permitting charges) .


Ray T Majuta
Electrical Plan Review,
PDSD, Tucson,
5/30/2013
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
05/28/2013 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
05/29/2013 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
2. Revise the Mechanical Compliance Certificate: use the climate zone for Tucson, not Tombstone, Arizona.
3. Coordinate the HVAC systems noted in the Mechanical Compliance Certificate with the scheduled mechanical equipment. The mechanical systems list only shows 255 MBH of total cooling capacity and a total chiller capacity of 344 tons.
4. Complete the Mechanical Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 4, the Requirements Checklist for the specified mechanical equipment. Note that the first item in the checklist calls for the selection of an "additional efficiency package" (i.e. efficient HVAC performance, efficient lighting system, or on-site supply of renewable energy) to be selected in order to comply with the energy code. Reference: Section C406, IECC 2012.
5. Verify that the mandatory requirements identified in the Mechanical Compliance Certificate have been adopted into the proposed mechanical design (e.g. a condenser heat recovery system for the air-cooled chillers, proportional reduction of chilled water pumping when one chiller is off-line, etc).
6. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains for the fan coil units (apartment) and the packaged AC unit, R1. Reference: Sections 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
05/30/2013 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Denied Waiting for resubmittal and only denied the plans to make sure Fire was part of review on second submittal.
05/31/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Park Ave Housing
T13CM02748
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 31, 2013


1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans they appear to match the development package.

3. Due to the amount of comments from other PDSD review agencies Zoning will not stamp and approve the building plans at this time.

4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/20/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed