Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T13CM02523
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/30/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 1: CONCERNING AN APPEAL TO REDUCE THE OCCUPANT LOAD: ACCORDING TO YOUR RESPONSE, THE REQUEST FOR THE REDUCED OCCUPANT LOAD HAS BEEN SENT TO ERNIE DUARTE, AND NO ACTION HAS BEEN APPROVED AT THIS TIME. VERIFY. |
| 05/31/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Verify the ability of a ¾" CW supply serve both a water closet and a urinal; this is not supported by the calculations on sheet P2.1 and is contradicted by key notes 6 (P1.1) and 11 (P1.2). Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide a complete plumbing plan, including water isometrics as well as waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is a single fitting, not a field-assembled group of individual fittings as shown in detail 11/P2.1. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2012. In addition, ASTM Standard D1784 applies only to the rigid PVC material used for pipe and fittings. (There is no ASTM Standard S1784.) [Initial comment: Provide the listing for the two-way cleanout fitting called out in detail 11/P2.1. Reference: Section 708.3.5, IPC 2012.] 3. Verify the number of gas turrets being installed; the 2nd level plumbing floor plan shows 10 turrets for a total load of 150 MBH but the gas schematic shows only nine turrets (room 53 appears to have been omitted from the schematic). Provide a single, dedicated s shut-off valve for room 52 per Section 409.6, IFGC 2012. Revise the size of the gas supply as required. [Initial comment: Provide a complete diagram of the natural gas distribution system showing the all of the loads, developed lengths, and the layout of the distribution piping. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 05/31/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify how the Additional Efficiency Package Requirements (Section C406, IECC 2012) have been addressed for this activity. The Envelope Compliance Certificate indicates that the high efficiency HVAC option has been selected but the Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate indicates that the reduced interior lighting power option has been selected. Since the HVAC design does not appear to comply with the high efficiency HVAC option, revise the Envelope Compliance Certificate accordingly. [Initial comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. Clarify item 13 of the generic requirements section of COMcheck and show how this discrepancy is to be resolved. (See also footnote a, Table C403.3.1 (1))[Initial comment: Show that the proposed HVAC system and equipment meets the requirements of Sections C403.2 and C403.3, IECC 2012 (e.g. provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification from COMcheck). Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code. 2012.] 3. Verify that the HVAC unit controls have been provided with an automatic start capability; the IECC compliance notes do not indicate that the units have this capability. Reference: Section C403.2.4.3.3, IECC 2012. (See also item 6 of the generic requirements section of COMcheck) [Initial comment: Show that each rooftop unit has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and start-up control and, if the control does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.] 4. Keynote 6 on sheet M1.2 calls for the termination of a 1-1/2" condensate drain into a 1-1/4" lavatory tailpiece. Condensate drains shall not decrease in size in the direction of flow. Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2012. [Initial comment: Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains and, if used, the secondary condensate drains. Reference: Sections 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.] 5. The occupant load used to calculate the required ventilation is not necessarily the same as the occupant load used for calculating exiting requirements (i.e. the architect occupant load). The occupant load used for calculating the minimum required ventilation is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2012 or an approved engineering analysis of the specific occupancy type. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2012. Revise the ventilation calculation for the cafeteria based on the occupant density shown in Table 403.3 or submit an appeal to the building official that justifies the alternative occupant load. The ventilation for the gymnasium is not dependent upon the number of occupants. [Initial comment: Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the current code. Systems serving multiple zones shall be individually calculated. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2013 | GERARDO BONILLA | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 06/03/2013 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/03/2013 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |