Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T13CM02068
Parcel: 12414115B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T13CM02068
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/17/2013 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
04/22/2013 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A1; DRAWING INDEX: THE INDEX INDICATES SHEET A5 WAS NOT USED. REVISE.
2. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: SECTION 1/A2 IS CUT THROUGH THE BUILDING. IS THIS THE CORRECT SECTION REFERENCE? VERIFY.
3. SHEET A2; CABINETS ELEVATION 1: THE IBC SECTION 1109.3 INDICATES SINKS IN ACCESSIBLE SPACES MUST MEET ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 606.3 INDICATES A SINK HEIGHT SHALL BE 34" MAXIMUM ABOVE THE FLOOR. VERIFY THAT REQUIREMENT IS MET.
4. SHEET A4; DETAIL 2: PROVIDE A DETAIL NUMBER AND TITLE.
5. SHEET A4: MAKE SURE ALL DETAILS ON THIS SHEET ARE CUT OR REFERENCED ON THE PLANS AND SECTIONS.
6. SHEET A4; DETAIL 13: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE AT THE OSB.
7. SHEET A4; DETAIL 14: THE CONNECTION ANGLE FOR B1 TO THE EXISTING TUBE COLUMN IS INDICATED AS A 4X4X6X1/4. REVISE.
8. SHEET A4; DETAIL 8: PROVIDE THE FOOTING SIZE AND REINFORCING ON THE DETAIL.
9. SHEET S1; FOUNDATION AND FRAMING PLANS: SECTION 1/A2 IS CUT THROUGH THE BUILDING. IS THIS THE CORRECT SECTION REFERENCE? VERIFY.
10. SHEET S1 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET A4 (DETAIL 10): DETAIL 10 IS CUT ON THE PLAN WHERE BEAMS B1 AND B2 CONNECT TO THE EXISTING CMU WALL. INDICATE BEAM B2 ON THE SECTION, AND REFERENCE ITS CONNECTION TO THE CMU WALL.
11. SHEET S1 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET A4 (DETAIL 6): THE DETAIL INDICATES THE 2X4 OUTRIGGERS ARE SPACED AT 48" OC, BUT THE PLAN SHOWS THEM AT 24" OC. COORDINATE.
12. SHEET S1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); FRAMING SCHEDULE: THE PLAN INDICATES C1 COLUMNS AT THE PORCH, WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES C2. REVISE.
13. SHEET S1; FRAMING SCHEDULE: ARE THE L1 MEMBERS THE HEADERS INDICATED ON THE PLAN? CLARIFY.
14. SHEET S1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET A4 (DETAIL 16): THE DETAIL INDICATES THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING IS 12" BELOW GRADE, WHILE THE FOUNDATION PLAN NOTE INDICATES 6" BELOW GRADE. COORDINATE.
15. SHEET S1; FOUNDATION PLAN: A NOTE INDICATES CONCEALED CONTROL JOINTS. PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE PLANS OF THAT JOINT.
16. SHEET S1; FOUNDATION PLAN: A NOTE AT THE PORCH INDICATES #4X 12" LONG SLAB DOWELS AT 16" OC. PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE MINIMUM EMBEDMENT OF THE DOWELS INTO THE EXISTING FOUNDATION, AND REFERENCE EPOXY.
17. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS WILL NOT BE PERFORMED WITHOUT RESPONSES.
04/23/2013 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
04/23/2013 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify the construction of the exterior walls of the classroom building; it is shown as R-20 on sheet M1, R-19 on sheet A3, and as R-22 (cavity) plus R-7.5 (continuous) on sheet A2. Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012.
2. Verify that the U-factor and the SHGF for the windows specified on sheets A2 and A3 meet the design values for the windows as shown on sheet M1. Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012.
3. Provide the U-factor and the SHGF values for the entrance doors (1/2 lite). Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012.
4. Provide the total cooling and heating capacities for the split system heat pump along with its proposed heating efficiency (HSPF). Reference: Section C403.2.3, IMC 2012.
04/23/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/24/2013 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed