Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM01537
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/29/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T13CM01537 7140 E Rose Wood Street Building Plans for Additions to existing Medical Office TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 29, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and while the building plans are in substantial compliance with the unapproved development package zoning cannot approve the building plans until the development package has been approved and the building plans are revised to match the revised development plan sheets. 2. Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal and compare the plans to the D.P. for consistency. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Building plans if applicable |
| 04/04/2013 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/10/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A2 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET S3.0 (FRAMING PLAN): PARTITION TYPE I ON THE FLOOR PLAN INDICATES A NEW INTERIOR BEARING WALL. REFERENCING SHEET S3.0, IT DOES NOT APPEAR THE NORTH WALL OF CORRIDOR 114, THE SOUTH WALL OF ROOM 121, OR THE EAST WALL OF ROOM 103 WILL BE BEARING WALLS SINCE THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN INDICATES A STEEL BEAM SUPPORT SYSTEM. VERIFY. 2. SHEET A2; PARTITION TYPES: THERE ARE 2 'TYPE J' WALLS INCLUDED HERE. REVISE. 3. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: MAKE SURE ALL NEW WALLS HAVE A PARTITION TYPE INDICATED ON THE PLAN. 4. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: ELEVATION A4/Cb IS NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN IN ROOM 116. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: ELEVATION A4/J IS NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN IN ROOM 103. VERIFY. 6. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: THE ELEVATION REFERENCE G/A4 (LOOKING EAST) AT ROOM 104 SHOULD INDICATE a. VERIFY. 7. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 18 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 8. SHEET A3 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET S3.1 (FRAMING PLAN): IN THE WEST WALL OF ROOM 128, THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE AN OPENING IN THE NEW METAL STUD WALL, WHILE THE STRUCTURAL PLAN INDICATES A NEW LINTEL. VERIFY. 9. SHEEET A3 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET S3.1 (FRAMING PLAN): IN THE EAST WALL OF ROOM 128, THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN INDICATES A KNOCKOUT PANEL FOR A FUTURE DOOR (KEYNOTE 6). ADD A NOTE ON SHEET S3.1 AT THE FUTURE DOOR LOCATION. 10. SHEET A3; KEYNOTES: NOTE 9 REFERENCES A NEW OPENING WITH A HEADER. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND/OR REFERENCE FOR THE HEADER SIZE. 11. SHEET A3; KEYNOTES: NOTES 12, 13, AND 14 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. ARE THESE THE ILLEGIBLE NOTES LOCATED IN ROOMS 122, 123, AND 131? VERIFY. 12. SHEET A4; ELEVATION D: THE TITLE REFERENCES 'STAFF LOUNGE #127'. REVISE. 13. SHEET A4; ELEVATION K: THE TITLE REFERENCES 'STORAGE UNIT ROOMS 127 AND 130'. REVISE. 14. SHEET A4; KEYNOTES: NOTES 23 AND 26 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 15. SHEET A5; ELEVATIONS A, B, C, D, E, AND F: REVISE THE ELEVATION DIMENSION LINES. 16. SHEET A5; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: REVISE THE TITLE TO ELEVATION KEYNOTES. 17. SHEET A5; KEYNOTES: NOTE 4 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 18. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 409: PROVIDE A DIMENSION OR REFERENCE TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE NEW STEEL COLUMN FROM THE FACE OF THE EXISTING FOUNDATION. 19. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 408: PROVIDE A DIMENSION OR REFERENCE TO THE FACE OF THE METAL STUD WALL FROM THE FACE OF THE EXISTING WALL. 20. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS WILL NOT BE PERFORMED UNTIL RESPONSES ARE PROVIDED |
| 04/12/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch (sheet M1). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 3. Provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification for the installation of the new mechanical equipment. Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 4. Provide information to show that the proposed variable refrigerant volume system is listed and labeled for the proposed application. Reference: Section 301.7, IMC 2012. |
| 04/12/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 2. Verify the materials that have been used for the existing building sewer and the storm sewer that will be located under the southern addition to the building comply with Table 702.3, IPC 2012. Note that the site plan indicates that it is a 6" building sewer, not a 4" building sewer. Reference: Sections 702 and 1102.3, IPC 2012. 3. Verify that there are either automatic or manual controls for the revised circulating hot water system per Section C404.6, IECC 2012. |
| 04/12/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the site drawing to show the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide sufficient information to show that the installation of the new plumbing fixtures will not cause the existing water supply to become overloaded (i.e. will the new total water demand exceed the capacity of the existing water meter). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 04/22/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |