Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM01405
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/15/2013 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/20/2013 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET S1.2 1. There are 12' high masonry walls on this project. Why are the special inspections not included as a requirement? This is also stated on page 13 of the calculations. Please clarify. 2. Please provide certification for all special inspectors required. SHEET S2.1 AND A1.2 3. The labs have a ceiling/floor structure that is adequately framed to handle a second floor load however there is no explanation of how this is to be used or how it is to be accessed. a. If it is to be used as storage please note such and provide signage as to the maximum load allowed and how it is to be accessed. b. If it is NOT to be used as storage please note such and provide signage as to that effect. SHEET A1.1 4. Please provide a fire partition floor plan identifying all required fire rated partitions and a code analysis of the rating requirements. SHEET A1.2 5. At the lab rooms: a. Reference detail 2/A4.1 that is to be changed to reflect a full height existing partition. b. Provide a new partition reference and a new wall section at the South end. c. Draw the West wall as a single line floor to wall edge. d. At the north-west corner from the new door jamb, turn the corner and connect to the existing partition with a new full height partition to match existing as detailed. Change the partition type from 6 to 1. e. Call out top of ceiling/floor structure and provide signage as to its use. f. Please reference sketch included on the drawing sheet A1.2 SHEET A4.1 6. At details 1, 2 and 3, change these details to reflect a 10" x 16 ga floor joist as per detail 201/S4.0. 7. At detail 2, extend the existing partition to the bottom of the existing deck to reflect actual conditions. SHEET A4.2 8. Provide a roof plan for the Pump Room. SHEET 5.1 9. Draw detail 9 to reflect a 10" x 16 ga floor joist as per detail 201/S4.0. SHEETS A5.2 AND A5.3 10. Details 3/A5.2 and 2/A5.3 are duplicative. Please delete one or the other. SHEET A6.1 11. Wall Type Legend: Please reference the fire rating testing lab assembly number desired for each fire rated partition and call out the actual fire rating. SHEET A6.2 12. At detail 1, how does someone get access to this platform with guard rails? 13. Please confirm fire door rating as to partition rating. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/26/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM01405 1. Sheet E1.1, Keynote 4 indicates 2 new HPS fixtures on outside wall, show circuit and load which allows new load connected to it. 2. Sheet E1.1, Keynote 12 indicates "provide circuitry for lighting being connected on this sheet". Provide circuits on plan and identify panel. 3. Sheet E1.2, identify lighting circuits and panel for mezzanine area fixtures. 4. Sheet E2.1, circuit L/4UPSDP 2 and 4 on receptacles, panel schedule shows them as panel feeder. 5. Sheet E2.1 concerning the EPO switches for the ex-fans, please describe their function. 6. Sheet E4.1, the #2 ground electrode conductor for the 150kva transformer should be #2/0 cu per 250.66. 7. Sheet E4.1, fault current cal's show Panels H/A4SBDP and H/4AUPSDB to have a 42kaic rating, the panels show a 65kaic rating, is this correct ? There is no mention of Series Rating Combinations, take it the panels and breakers to be fully rated ? 8. Concerning the 2 HPU units being fed from the 400amp disconnect, the panel shows a 225 amp breaker, what protects the units individually ? Ray Majuta Elect Plan Review DSD, Tucson 3/28/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/28/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the nature of the specified chillers; they are scheduled as water-cooled units but the specifications are for air-cooled chillers. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 2. Verify that the specified chillers are listed and labeled for the proposed application. Reference: Section 301.7, IMC 2012. 3. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the current code for the occupied rooms served by B3-HP-2, C3-AC-1, C3-AC-5, D3-HP-1, and D3-HP-2. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012. 4. Clarify how natural ventilation for the UPS room complies with the requirements of Section 502.4, IMC 2012. |
| 03/28/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/28/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/09/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Multiple references made to "pump room." Is this a fire pump room? Please clarify. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/10/2013 | SHANAE POWELL | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 04/10/2013 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |