Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM00407
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET PV0.0: A NOTE INDICATES THE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM WILL BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV. 2. SHEET 2 OF 4; DETAIL 3: A DETAIL CUT INDICATES 4/2. REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE. 3. SHEET 4 OF 4; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE 1 REFERENCES THE 2006 IBC. REVISE. 4. SHEET 4 OF 4 (GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 1): THE STRUCTURAL STEEL GENERAL NOTES INDICATE 'ALL BOLTS IN STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS ARE TO CONFORM TO ASTM A307, UNLESS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS'. NO NOTE WAS FOUND ON THE DRAWINGS, BUT THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS INDICATE ASTM A325 STEEL FRAME BOLTS. CLARIFY. 5. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGE 1: UNDER 'DESIGN CRITERIA', THE 2006 IBC IS LISTED. REVISE. 6. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: A NEW SECTION 1609.5.1.1 IN THE CITY OF TUCSON AMENDMENTS TO THE 2012 IBC REQUIRES: "IN ADDITION TO REQUIREMENTS OF ASCE 7, MINIMUM UPLIFT RESISTANCE SHALL BE DETERMINED BY EITHER METHOD 1 OR 2" (LISTED IN THE AMENDMENT). SHOW THE ANALYSIS (STARTING ON PAGE 4 OF THE CALCULATIONS) MEETS THAT REQUIREMENT. 7. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/20/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |