Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM08078
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/23/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/24/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S001; FOUNDATIONS: THE SOIL REPORT LISTED IN THE GENERAL NOTES DOES NOT MATCH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PROVIDED. VERIFY. 2. SHEET S100; SHEET NOTES: NOTE 6 REFERENCES A STEP FOOTING DETAIL 07/S002. CHANGE THE REFERENCE SHEET. 3. SHEET S100; SHEET NOTES: NOTE 1 REFERENCES A RETAINING WALL SCHEDULE. PROVIDE THE LOCATION FOR THAT SCHEDULE ON THE DRAWINGS. 4. SHEET S100; FOUNDATION PLAN: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLAN. 5. SHEET S100; FOUNDATION PLAN: ADD THE WALL FOOTING MARK TO THE WALL ABOVE GRID 1 ON THE PLAN. 6. SHEET S100 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET C1); SHEET S201 (COLUMN SCHEDULE): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE COLUMNS F1 AND F2 TO BE CC7, AND COLUMNS F5 AND F6 TO BE CC7A. HOWEVER, THE PLAN INDICATES THOSE FOUR COLUMNS TO BE CC8 (NO CC8 IS LISTED IN THE COLUMN SCHEDULE). CLARIFY. 7. SHEET S100; FOUNDATION PLAN: THERE IS A DASHED LINE AROUND COLUMNS D2, D3, E2, AND E3. IS THERE A DETAIL CALL OUT MISSING? VERIFY. 8. SHEET S301; DETAIL 108: MOVE THE DETAIL SO NOTES ON DETAIL 111 ARE LEGIBLE. 9. GENERAL: THIS IS A FOUNDATION ONLY PERMIT. IT APPEARS SHEETS S101 (P1 FLOOR FRAMING), S102 (LEVEL 1 FLOOR FRAMING), AND S102A (LEVEL 1 SLAB REINFORCING) ARE PRESENTED TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT (NOT MARKED AS 'PROGRESS PRINT'). VERIFY. REVIEW FOR THIS PERMIT INCLUDES FOUNDATION ONLY. 10. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV. FOR THIS PERMIT, IT WILL INCLUDE ONLY THE EXCAVATION SHORING SYSTEMS. 11. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 01/25/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: IronHorse - Foundation Only T12CM08078 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 25, 2013 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until a development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 01/29/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the control method that will be used for the parking garage exhaust fans and show how the proposed controls comply with the requirements of either item #1 or item #2 of Section 404.1, IMC 2012. 2. The exhaust fan schedule indicates that exhaust fans P1, P2, P3, and P4 are equipped with variable frequency drives. Provide the sequence of operation for the fans along with the minimum air flow rate for the fans. Reference: Section 404.2, IMC 2012. 3. Show how the elevator lobby in level P2 is to be maintained at a positive pressure with regard to the parking garage. Reference: Sections 404.3 and 404.3, IMC 2012. |
| 01/29/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/31/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The area and foundation drain system shown on sheet P100 shows unidentified rectangular objects located outside of the building footing which connect to the perforated drainage pipe located inside of the building footing; provide an identification of these objects. 2. Four floor sinks are shown connected to the area drainage system on levels P1 and P2; provide traps for these fixtures and explain how these traps are to be protected from siphonage. Reference: Sections 901.2, 1002.1, and 1002.4, IPC 2012. 3. Clarify drawing P102 which shows several roof drain pipes with question marks located where pipe sizes or drainage areas should be. |
| 02/01/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM08078 1031 N Park Foundation Permit 1. Will the entire Service and all electrical equipment shown on Sheet E500 be included on this permit or is it shown for reference ? Provide a description of what is to be involved on this permit, including floors. 2. Sheet E 500 indicated the grounding system for the service is to be shown on E506, which is not provided. Provide a detail of the grounding system, ( will be required to have a tie to rebar per 2005 NEC 230-52 and 66)3. 3. Provide a larger scaled detail of Electrical Room 107 showing showing all electrical equipment. Ray T Majuta Electrical Plan Review PDSD, C of Tucson 2/1/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/05/2013 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DP12-0132 is approved therefore this building permit is approvable for Engineering review. Engineering will stamp the plans once all other reviewers have approved the plans. |
| 02/13/2013 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED MANHOLE CONST PERMIT NEED IWC NEED CAPACITY LETTER NEED EXIST WATER METERS FOR CREDIT EVAL |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/22/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |