Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM07648
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/07/2013 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
12/06/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
12/10/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning has reviewd the building plans and while the plans are in substantial comliance with the un-approved development package site plan, zoning cannot approve the building at this time. Zoning will review and approve the building plans once the development package is approved. |
12/17/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET g1.1 (DETAIL 1); SHEET g1.3 (ELEVATION 2): THE DETAIL ON SHEET g1.1 INDICATES A VERTICAL GRAB BAR, WHILE THE ELEVATION ON SHEET g1.3 DOES NOT. COORDINATE PER THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 604.5.1. 2. SHEET g1.1 (DETAIL 1); SHEET g1.3 (ELEVATION 2): THE DETAIL ON g1.1 LOCATES THE PAPER DISPENSER FROM THE FRONT OF THE WATER CLOSET, WHILE THE ELEVATION ON SHEET g1.3 LOCATES IT FROM THE BACK WALL. COORDINATE PER THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 604.5.1. 3. SHEET S1.6; DETAIL 39: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION. 4. SHEETS S2.0 AND S2.1; PLANS: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLANS. 5. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 42): THE FOOTING DENOTED F1 IN THE CALCULATIONS AT FOUR INTERIOR COLUMNS IS DESIGNED AS A 4'-3" SQUARE FOOTING, BUT THE PLAN (AND SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.7) INDICATES A 4'-0" SQUARE FOOTING. COORDINATE. 6. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE TOWER FOOTINGS WERE NOT LOCATED. VERIFY. 7. SHEET S2.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 8): THE JOISTS DENOTED J2 IN THE CALCULATIONS (TO THE LEFT OF GRID AND ABOVE GRID 4 AND TO THE LEFT OF GRID E AND ABOVE GRID 4) ARE DESIGNED AS W10X22, BUT THE PLAN (AND SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.7) INDICATES A 16K5. VERIFY. 8. SHEET S2.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 8): THE JOISTS DENOTED J3 IN THE CALCULATIONS (TO THE RIGHT OF GRID A BETWEEN GRIDS 4 AND 5 AND TO THE LEFT OF GRID E BETWEEN GRIDS 4 AND 5) ARE DESIGNED AS HSS8X2X 3/16, BUT THE PLAN (AND SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.7) INDICATE A 14K4. VERIFY. 9. SHEET S2.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 8): THE JOISTS DENOTED J3 IN THE CALCULATIONS (TO THE RIGHT OF GRID A BETWEEN GRIDS 5 AND 7 AND TO THE LEFT OF GRID E BELOW GRID 5) ARE DESIGNED AS HSS8X2X 3/16, BUT THE PLAN (AND SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.7) INDICATE A 14K4. VERIFY. 10. SHEET S2.1 (TOWER FRAMING PLANS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE TOWER FRAMING PLANS WERE NOT LOCATED. VERIFY. 11. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 107: ADD NOTE 6 ON THE DETAIL. 12. SHEET S3.0 (DETAIL 107); SHEET a6.3 (ELEVATION 3): THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION INDICATES A CHAMFERED EDGE AT THE CONCRETE PEDESTAL, WHILE THE STRUCTURAL DETAIL DOES NOT. COORDINATE. 13. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 201: IN NOTE 4, ADD THE SPECIFIC DETAILS TO REFERENCE. 14. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 204: IN NOTE 5, ADD THE STEEL PLATE SPACING, OR REFERENCE THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.7. 15. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 205: IN NOTE 5 (OR ON THE DETAIL), INDICATE THE WELD ON THE ANGLE TO THE BEAM, OR REFERENCE A NOTE OR SCHEDULE. 16. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 213: IN NOTE 3 (OR ON THE DETAIL), INDICATE THE WELD ON THE ANGLE TO THE JOIST, OR REFERENCE A NOTE OR SCHEDULE. 17. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 217: CLEAR UP THE NOTES. 18. SHEET S4.2; DETAIL 231: IS NOTE 6 SHOWN IN THE CORRECT LOCATION? VERIFY AND ADD TRUSS NOTE. 19. SHEET a6.0; SECTION 3: PROVIDE THE ANGLE THICKNESS SHOWN AT THE TOP OF THE WALL (ANGLE 1-1/4" X 1-1/4" ENLARGED IN DETAIL 1/a9.2). 20. SHEET a9.4; DETAIL 8: PROVIDE THE QUANTITY AND SIZE OF CONNECTIONS OF THE METAL STUD BRACE TO THE WALL AND TO THE DECK, OR REFERENCE A DETAIL. 21. GENERAL: ON THE DRAWINGS, PROVIDE A LIST OF ALL CODES USED IN THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT. 22. GENERAL: PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL SECTIONS AND DETAILS AT THE DRIVE THROUGH ROOF AND COLUMNS. 23. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
12/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify that the contributory area of the drive through roof has been included in the roof drain calculations for the northwest roof area. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1107, IPC 2006. 2. The architectural roof plan shows a roof drain (without an overflow) for the high roof on the south side of the building. What is the size of the roof drain and where does its leader terminate? Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1107, IPC 2006. 3. Provide a design for the attachment of the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 301.2, IPC 2006. |
12/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
12/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. Coordinate the U-values and the SHGC-values with the specifications. Reference: Section 502, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
12/31/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1: VANTAGE WEST CREDIT UNION 2: CONNECTION TO 1" WATER METER PER PLUMBING DRAWINGS AND ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER PER MAPGUIDE 3: NEED TO INCLUDE SITE UTILITY PLANS WITH BUILDING DRAWINGS SHOWING LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - NEED DP APPROVAL G.K. - 12/28/12 |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
01/18/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |