Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T12CM07590
Parcel: 11005014C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T12CM07590
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/05/2012 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Denied Plans reference Phoenix. Please remove the City of Phoenix language. Plans have redline corrections on the door schedule and lighting. Confusion over where the emergency lighting is and how much will be provided. Deadbolts and panic hardware should not go together. The gates need panic hardware unless they will not be locking at all.
12/07/2012 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
12/07/2012 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL


FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician

PROJECT:
T12CM07590
2920 North Swan Road
Restaurant expansion and remodel


TRANSMITTAL: December 7, 2012


COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.


This proposed restaurant expansion is in Plaza Palomino and is related to DP12-0070. The Zoning is C-2 and R-1.

The plan as submitted exceeds the parameters of a tenant improvement, and cannot be approved.

The expansion and remodel shall require a revision of the calculations and the site plan for DP12-0070. The proposed restaurant expansion includes existing retail space, building square footage and outdoor dinning.
12/13/2012 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SHEET A1.0
1. In the Project Data Summary, please delete all references to the 2010 ADASAD.
SHEET A1.1
2. Under the Fire Ordinance Requirements, note 4, please change the reference to the "City of Tucson".
SHEET A3.0
3. Please show the accessible seating as calculated on sheet A1.0.
4. Please clarify the partition material and finishes behind the exhaust hood. With the references shown it is not clear that it is code compliant with non combustible and impervious to moisture material as required by code.
a. Please provide a wall section showing all construction material, finishes and area to be covered.
SHEET A 5.1
5. As noted by the Fire Department reviewer.
6. The toilet room layout is not code compliant. As per the 2006 IBC, Section 2902.2, where plumbing fixtures are required, separate facilities shall be provided. This includes separate lavatories.
SHEET A8.2
7. At detail 8 and 10, please clarify how the sink troughs comply with the ICC A117.1, Section 606.
SHEET A9.2
8. At detail 42, reference 12/A9.0 is incorrect, please reconcile.
SHEET S1.1
9. Please provide certification of special inspectors.
10. Please provide structural calculations for:
a. Exhaust Hood support
b. All relocated FCU
SHEETS A3.0, A3.1, A4.0, DETAILS 1 AND 2 A8.0
11. Please clarify the 2 x 2 steel frame structures separating and or covering the outdoor seating area located in the south west corner of the building. Provide all required structural calculations and details for compliance and review.
END OF REVIEW
12/20/2012 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
12/20/2012 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T12CM07590
2920 N Swan Rd
TI Restaurant

1. Provide a calculation showing compliance with 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code concerning all outdoor lighting including outdoor building lighting. Include on plan.
2. Clearify emergency lighting locations and verify compliance with requirements of 2006 IBC.
3. Provide information on percisely the type of fault current system to be used concering the main service and the P-1 thur 4 panels, and address the existing panels being re-fed as to what will be fault current levels will be after leaving new disconnect mains. Your note on Sheet E4.0 indicates manufacture of gear to provide, obtain information and provide with these plans.
4. Provide a detail for Switchbank 1 and 2, and how they are to be installed, please indicate where they will be located.

Ray T Majuta
Electrical Plan Review
PDSD, City of Tucson
12/21/2012
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.com
12/20/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Appliances (e.g. coffee makers, ice makers, etc) and chemical dispensers that are to be directly connected to the water supply system but do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006.
2. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
3. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006.
4. Unless there is a structural issue, each vent pipe shall rise vertically to a minimum of 6" above the flood-level rim of the fixture it serves before offsetting horizontally. Reference: Section 905.3, UPC 2006.
12/21/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide structural details to show how the relocated fan coil units are to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
2. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I and Type II hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
3. Show that the hood installation complies with Section 507.9, IMC 2006 with regard to a smooth, cleanable, non-absorbent, and non-combustible material installed between the hood and the wall, and extending 18" beyond the hood and with non-combustible supports for the wall.
12/27/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1: VERO ONE - DP12-0070
2: NEED CAPACITY EVALUATION - KURT STEM 740-6534
3: NEED WASTEWATER/INDUSTRIAL REVIEW OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR - "RUSTY" 724-6200- 3035 W EL CAMINO DE CERRO
4: NEED TO SHOW SIZE, LOCATION AND NUMBER OF ALL WATER METERS ON PROPERTY FOR SEWER CONNECTION FEE CALCULATION GK- 12/26/12

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/03/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed