Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM05861
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, using Pima County < 4,000 feet, not Oro Valley. Coordinate the building components used in the analysis (e.g. continuous roof insulation) with those shown on the drawing. Reference: Sections 302.2 and 502, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/31/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/01/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | T12CM05861 1335 W Ajo Dollar General Sent E-mail today today to Mr Jack Cronell ,PolyPhase Eng, concerning the response letter dated Oct 26,2012.The letter had comments on allowing the 400 amp service to be allowed which would feed a 398 amp load. After consideration and in talking to other Plans Examiners including some from other jurisdictions, it was decided to request a larger service to feed the 398 amp load. We research three other Dollar General Buildings in Tucson and found each to be fed with 50 amps or more to each. I feel that the building being new requires a larger ampacity at the service in order to provide for growth. The NEC , Article 90 Section B indicates that an installation be adequate for good service or future expansion of electrical use. This service is too close for it's calculation. Ray T Majuta Electrical Plans Examiner PDSD, C of Tuc 11/2/2012 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/07/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/14/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |