Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T12CM05824
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/25/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/25/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM05824 1365 W Grant TD 339.36 KW DC Photovoltaic System The electrical plans have been denied for the following items, address each one individually and explain how each was addressed. 1. Provide along with the specification sheet submitted for the modules, specification sheets for the Inverters and the Combiner boxes. 2. Provide information on which conduits and there cables are to be mounted on roofs, indicate how there ampacities have been adjusted for ambient temperatures per NEC 310.16. 3. Sheet E-2 note 10 indicates a tap to be made on supply side of existing 2000 amp SES. Provide a detailed front elevation sheet showing the following: a. the location of the three conduits from the PV Disconnets going to and entering the SES, show which compartment is being entered and if space provided, show top,bottom or side entry. b. show the available space inside the SES where these conductors will land, how they will be terminated, what type of lugs are to be used, c. show how the conductors are to be supported, d. indicate if the bus bars in the SES have been previously drilled and tapped (are the bus bars approved for additional conductors?) 4. Indicate on this sheet that the AHJ (City of Tucson,DSD) will require that this installation be provided with third party certification by an OSHA approved Testing Laboritory. Ray T Majuta Electrical Plan Review PDSD-City of Tucson 1025/2012 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/26/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S1 (CANOPY FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 2): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE STEEL COLUMN IS A W12X50, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A W12X45 (TYP.). COORDINATE. 2. SHEET S1; GENERAL NOTES: NOTE 4 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN OR SECTION. PROVIDE. 3. SHEET S2; GENERAL NOTES: NOTE 4 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN OR SECTION. PROVIDE. 4. SHEET S3; DETAIL 5: IS THE 3'-10 1/2" DIMENSION SUPPOSED TO BE TO THE EDGE OF THE FOOTING? REVISE. 5. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (LAM STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING LLC): A COMMENT IS MADE IN THE CALCULATIONS THAT THE ROOF LIVE LOAD AT THE NEW PHOTOVOLTAIC LOCATIONS CAN NOT BE APPLIED, THEREFORE THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE IS ADEQUATE. PROVIDE THE 2006 IBC SECTION REFERENCE THAT ALLOWS THE ROOF LIVE LOAD TO BE DISMISSED TOTALLY. MAINTENANCE WILL BE PERFORMED ON THE PANELS, THUS INCURRING ACTUAL LIVE LOADS AS PRESCRIBED IN TABLE 1607.1. 6. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 10/29/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/13/2012 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |