Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM04806
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/14/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM04806 ONE EAST BROADWAY APTS. SECOND STRUCTURAL REVIEW 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 1: THE SOILS REPORT WAS NOT PROVIDED FOR REVIEW. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 10: THE FOOTING AT GRIDS 9 AND B ON SHEET S2.0 (F4) HAS REINFORCEMENT OF 11-#7 (PER THE FOOTING SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.10), WHILE THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 647) INDICATE 11-#9. CLARIFY. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: IF THE ONLY HOLDOWNS (PER THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.10) ARE LOCATED ON SHEET S3.9, ADD A REFERENCE NOTE TO THE HOLDOWN SCHEDULE FOR THAT SHEET. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 13: IF THE ONLY CONCRETE COUPLING BEAMS (PER THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.10) ARE LOCATED ON SHEET S3.12, ADD A REFERENCE NOTE TO THE SCHEDULE FOR THAT SHEET. 5. PREVIOUS COMMENT 19: DETAIL 410 ON SHEET S5.0 WAS NOT FOUND ON SHEET S3.2 AT THE FLAT PLATE SLAB. VERIFY. 6. PREVIOUS COMMENT 89: THE DETAILS ON SHEETS S5.2 AND S5.3 ARE REPEATED. REMOVE SHEET S5.3. 7. GENERAL: PROVIDE TWO SETS OF STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND THE CALCULATION UPDATES. 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. ARCHITECTURAL RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS: 9. In reference to Comment 8, as per ICC A117.1, Section 502.2, a “Van Accessible” parking space must be one of the following configurations, 1. 11’-0” wide parking space with a 5’-0” wide aisle or 2. 8’-0” wide parking space with an 8’-0” wide aisle. The designed Van Accessible Parking space is 9’-0” wide with a 5’-0” wide aisle. Please reconcile. |
| 09/18/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/24/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Coordinate the notes and detail call-outs on the drawings that reference the bathroom and laundry closet exhaust ducts. Keynote #2 on sheets M107 and M108 still calls for sub-ducts and refers to detail 8/M302; and the exhaust ducts on sheets M107 and M108 still appear to be drawn as sub-ducts because they do not extend up through the seventh floor. [Original comment: Detail 8/M302 shows an exhaust duct shaft with a gravity relief hood mounted at the top of the shaft. Show how continuous upward airflow is to be ensured in the exhaust duct shaft. Reference: Section 607.5.5, exceptions 1.1 and 2, IMC 2006. (Note that the exhaust duct shaft serving units 512, 612, and 712 does not appear to be located in the same location as the relief hood on the roof.)] 2. Clarify the type of fans used for the bathroom and laundry closet exhausts; the general notes on M107, M108, and M109 indicate that the bathroom fans are in-line fans and the laundry room fans are rooftop centrifugal fans. Show the location of the fans on the drawing. 3. The exhaust duct configuration you appear to have used requires you to provide a minimum 12" long steel sleeve for each duct penetration of the wall per Section 607.5.3 (3.6), IMC 2006. Show a detail of this penetration. |
| 09/26/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |