Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM04806
Parcel: 11712087C

Address:
1 E BROADWAY BL

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T12CM04806
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/13/2012 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied GENERAL
1. Please provide a letter to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose, listing all the items for deferred submittal; post tension calculations, window washing anchorage and steel stairs.
2. For all stair well plans, please show the area of refuge as required by section 1007.3.
3. Insure all exit doors have panic hardware as required by 1008.1.9.
SHEET A011
4. Please provide a total unit summary with a type "A" unit and "B" unit calculation and summary. Reference loaction of type "A" units to floor plans.
5. Please provide a total parking summary and calculations for the number of accessible parking spaces required.
SHEET A101
6. Please locate the accessible parking space next to the elevatior entrance as per Section 1106.6.
a. Please locate and show accessible parking signage.
SHEET A102
7. Locate the one accessible parking space to the first floor nearest to the elevator entrance.
8. One of six accessible parking spaces must be "Van Accessible". (Section 1106.5) Please identifty the "van accessible" space.
9. Include "Van Accessible" signage, show location.
SHEET A103
10. Locate 1 accessible parking space from the basement levetrl 1. Make it a "van Accessible" space. Show signage location.
SHEET A104
11. Locate accessible parking space adjacent to the elevator entrance. (Section 1106.6)
END OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW

STRUCTURAL COMMENTS COMPLETED BY ERIC NEWCOMB 8-24-12
T12CM04806
STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS

1. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOILS REPORT WAS USED ON THIS PROJECT. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW.
2. SHEET S1.1; STRUCTURAL NOTES (SHOP DRAWINGS AND DEFERRED SUBMITTALS): ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV.
3. SHEETS S1.7 AND S1.8; DETAILS: DETAILS 94 AND 95 APPEAR ON BOTH OF THESE SHEETS, INDICATING DIFFERENT CONDITIONS. REVISE.
4. SHEET S1.8; DETAIL 107: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32". REVISE THE LETTERING FOR DETAIL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS.
5. SHEET S1.9 (CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE); SHEET S2.0 (PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGES 623 AND 624): THE COLUMN LOCATED AT 97.74'-75.94' IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES A 24"X24" COLUMN FROM THE LOWER LEVEL TO THE FIFTH FLOOR WITH 12-#7 VERTICALS, WHILE THE PLAN (C5) INDICATES A 24"X24" COLUMN FROM THE LOWER LEVEL TO THE THIRD FLOOR AND AN 18"X18" COLUMN WITH 12-#6 VERTICALS FROM THE THIRD FLOOR TO THE FIFTH FLOOR. CLARIFY.
6. SHEET S1.9 (CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE); SHEET S2.0 (PLAN): THE FOUR COLUMNS ON GRID A (ALL C3) EXTEND ONLY TO THE THIRD FLOOR. THIS IS NOT INDICATED ON THE CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE. VERIFY.
7. SHEET S1.9 (CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE); SHEET S2.0 (PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 622): THE COLUMN LOCATED AT 126.74'-75.94' IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES A 24"X24" COLUMN FROM THE LOWER LEVEL TO THE FIFTH FLOOR WITH 12-#7 VERTICALS, WHILE THE PLAN (C5) INDICATES A 24"X24" COLUMN FROM THE LOWER LEVEL TO THE THIRD FLOOR AND AN 18"X18" COLUMN WITH 12-#6 VERTICALS FROM THE THIRD FLOOR TO THE FIFTH FLOOR. CLARIFY.
8. SHEET S1.9 (CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE); SHEET S2.0 (PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 632): THE COLUMN LOCATED AT 24.49'-47.69' IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES AN 18"X18" COLUMN WHILE THE PLAN (C2) INDICATES AN 18"X24" COLUMN. CLARIFY.
9. SHEET S1.9 (CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE); SHEET S2.0 (PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 631): THE COLUMN LOCATED AT 1.39'-47.69' IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES AN 18"X18" COLUMN WHILE THE PLAN (C2) INDICATES AN 18"X24" COLUMN. CLARIFY.
10. SHEET S1.10 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); SHEET S2.0 (PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 647): AT THE FOOTING AT GRIDS 9 AND B, THE REINFORCING IN THE FOOTING (#124) SHOWN IN THE CALCULATIONS (11-#9) DIFFERS FROM THE REINFORCING (F4) INDICATED IN THE SCHEDULE (9-#7). CLARIFY.
11. SHEET S1.10; HOLDOWN SCHEDULE: ARE THESE LOCATED ON ANY OF THE PLANS? VERIFY AND PROVIDE (THE CALCULATIONS INDICATED SOME SHEAR WALLS REQUIRE HOLDOWNS AND OTHERS DO NOT).
12. SHEET S1.10 (CONCRETE COUPLING BEAM SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGES 204 AND 205): COUPLING BEAM 2 IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES #5 STIRRUPS AT 6" OC, WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES #3 AT 6" OC. CLARIFY.
13. SHEET S1.10; CONCRETE COUPLING BEAM SCHEDULE: WHERE ARE THESE BEAMS LOCATED ON THE PLANS? VERIFY.
14. SHEETS S2.0, S3.0, S3.1, S3.2, S3.3, S3.4, S3.5, S3.6, AND S3.7; CONCRETE FRAMING NOTES: UNDER NOTE 9, THE 'STEP IN SLAB' AND THE 'CHANGE IN SLOPE OF SLAB' SYMBOLS SHOULD BE REVERSED. VERIFY.
15. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 10 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
16. SHEET S2.0; PLAN: IS THE FOOTING ON THE NORTH WALL OF THE RAMP A WF1? VERIFY AND INDICATE.
17. SHEET S3.1; PT FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTES 1, 2, 3, AND 9 WERE NOT FOUND ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
18. SHEET S3.1; PARKING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 14 (NEAR GRIDS 9 AND D) IS NOT INDICATED IN THE FLOOR FRAMING PLAN NOTES. VERIFY.
19. SHEET S3.1 (PARKING PLAN); SHEET S5.0 (DETAIL 410): SHOULD DETAIL 410, CUT ON THE PLAN ON GRID D BETWEEN GRIDS 3 AND 4, BE CUT AT THE NEXT LEVEL UP (AT THE FLAT PLATE SLAB)? VERIFY.
20. SHEET S3.1 (PARKING PLAN); SHEET S4.1 (DETAILS 214 AND 216): THESE TWO DETAILS ARE CUT NEARLY IN THE SAME LOCATION, BUT INDICATE DIFFERENT CONDITIONS AT THE SLAB/WALL CONNECTION. VERIFY.
21. SHEET S3.2; FRAMING PLAN: FRAMING NOTE 11 (AT GRIDS 5 AND F) IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
22. SHEET S3.2 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.3 (DETAIL 452): DETAIL 452 IS CUT ON THE FRAMING PLAN, BUT THE DETAIL IS BLANK. REVISE.
23. SHEET S3.2; FRAMING PLAN: DETAILS 420 AND 434 ARE CUT IN THE SAME AREA (GRIDS 1 AND H), BUT THE DETAILS SHOW DIFFERENT CONDITIONS. VERIFY.
24. SHEET S3.3; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTES 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, AND 13 WERE NOT FOUND ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
25. SHEET S3.3; FRAMING PLAN: THE PT TENDON ON GRID F DOES NOT INDICATE A FIXED END. VERIFY.
26. SHEET S3.3; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 9 (INDICATED AT THE STAIRS) IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
27. SHEET S3.3 (FRAMING PLAN); FRAMING PLAN NOTES (NOTE 11): NOTE 11 INDICATES A SHADE CANOPY PER DETAIL 645. IS THIS CORRECT?
28. SHEET S3.3; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: IN NOTE 15, REFERENCE THE SPECIFIC SHEET FOR THE CANOPY DETAILS.
29. SHEET S3.3 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.2 (DETAIL 461): DETAIL 461 IS CUT ON THE PLAN AT GRIDS 9 AND G. THE DETAIL INDICATES A CANOPY AT THIS WALL, BUT THE FRAMING PLAN DOES NOT SHOW IT. CLARIFY.
30. SHEET S3.4 (THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S1.9 (CONCRETE BEAM SCHEDULE): THE CONCRETE BEAMS SHOWN ON THE PLAN (CB5 THROUGH CB8) ARE NOT LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE. VERIFY.
31. SHEET S3.4; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTES 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 11, AND 15 WERE NOT FOUND ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
32. SHEET S3.4; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 6 INDICATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST STAIR IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
33. SHEET S3.4; FRAMING PLAN: THE PT TENDON ON GRID F DOES NOT INDICATE A FIXED END. VERIFY.
34. SHEET S3.4; FRAMING PLAN: THE DETAIL CUT 621 AT THE ELEVATOR IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
35. SHEET S3.5; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTES 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, AND 15 WERE NOT FOUND ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
36. SHEET S3.5; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 6 INDICATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST STAIR IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
37. SHEET S3.5; FRAMING PLAN: THE PT TENDON ON GRID F DOES NOT INDICATE A FIXED END. VERIFY.
38. SHEET S3.5; FRAMING PLAN: THE DETAIL CUT 621 AT THE ELEVATOR IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
39. SHEET S3.6; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTES 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, AND 15 WERE NOT FOUND ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
40. SHEET S3.6; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 9 AT BOTH STAIRS IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
41. SHEET S3.7; BEARING WALL PLAN: THE DETAIL CUT 625 AT SEVERAL INTERIOR WALLS IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
42. SHEETS S3.8 AND S3.9 (SIXTH AND SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLANS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 17): BEAM DB1 IN THE CALCULATIONS IS LISTED AS (2) 16" X 3 1/2" X 12 GAGE METAL STUDS BOX BEAM (PAGE 22), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A W10X39 (B3). CLARIFY.
43. SHEETS S3.8 AND S3.9 (SIXTH AND SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLANS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 17): BEAM DB6 IN THE CALCULATIONS IS LISTED AS (2) 8" X 2 1/2" X 12 GAGE METAL STUDS BOX BEAM (PAGE 22), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES AN HSS8X8X 1/4 (B5). CLARIFY.
44. SHEETS S3.8 AND S3.9; SIXTH AND SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLANS: THE ARROW INDICATORS FOR THE FLOOR JOISTS DO NOT EXTEND TO THE LAST JOIST ON THE WEST END (BETWEEN GRIDS C.9 AND G.1 ON GRID 1). IS THIS BEAM B5 OR A JOIST? VERIFY.
45. SHEETS S3.8 AND S3.9 (SIXTH AND SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLANS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 17): BEAM DB8 IN THE CALCULATIONS IS LISTED AS (2) 8" X 2 1/2" X 12 GAGE METAL STUDS BOX BEAM (PAGE 23), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A W8X18 (B6). CLARIFY.
46. SHEETS S3.8 AND S3.9 (SIXTH AND SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLANS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 17): BEAM DB11 IN THE CALCULATIONS IS LISTED AS AN HSS8X8X 1/4 (PAGE 25), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES (2) 8" X 2 1/2" X 12 GAGE METAL STUDS BOX BEAM (B1). CLARIFY.
47. SHEETS S3.8 AND S3.9; SIXTH AND SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLANS: ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CORRIDOR WALLS AND GRID 9, THERE ARE TWO BEAMS INDICATED. ARE THESE HEADER BEAMS PER THE SCHEDULE? VERIFY. IF SO, ADD A NOTE 7.
48. SHEETS S3.8 AND S3.9; SIXTH AND SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLANS: THE FLOOR JOISTS AT THE CORRIDOR DO NOT INDICATE A GAGE. PROVIDE OR INDICATE A REFERENCE.
49. SHEETS S3.8 AND S3.9; SIXTH AND SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLANS: THE FLOOR JOISTS AT THE ELEVATOR DO NOT INDICATE A GAGE. PROVIDE OR INDICATE A REFERENCE.
50. SHEETS S3.8 AND S3.9 (SIXTH AND SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLANS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 17): THE FLOOR JOISTS DJ5 IN THE CALCULATIONS ARE LISTED AS 6" X 1 3/8" X 20 GAGE, WHILE THE PLAN (NOTE 8 IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS) INDICATES 16" X 3 1/2" X 12 GAGE JOISTS. CLARIFY.
51. SHEETS S3.8 AND S3.9 (SIXTH AND SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLANS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 17): THE FLOOR JOISTS DF6 IN THE CALCULATIONS ARE LISTED AS 14' X 2" X 14 GAGE, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES 16" DEEP "C" JOISTS. CLARIFY AND INDICATE JOIST GAGE.
52. SHEET S3.8; SIXTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: THERE ARE NO SHEAR WALLS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. PROVIDE.
53. SHEET S3.8; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTES 2, 3, 13, AND 14 WERE NOT FOUND ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
54. SHEET S3.8; FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 622 AT GRIDS 1 AND D IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
55. SHEET S3.8; FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 621 AT GRIDS 3 AND C.9 IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
56. SHEET S3.8; FRAMING PLAN: DETAILS 621 AND 621A ARE INDICATED AT SEVERAL EXTERIOR STUD WALL LOCATIONS ON THE PLAN. THESE ARE NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
57. SHEET S3.8; FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 604 IS INDICATED AT SEVERAL INTERIOR STUD WALL LOCATIONS ON THE PLAN. THESE ARE SIMILAR UNLESS CUT AT A DOUBLE STUD WALL (GRID 4). REVISE THE DETAIL NOTATIONS.
58. SHEET S3.9; SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: THE BEAM INDICATOR B3 IS MISSING ON THE PLAN ON GRID C.9 TO THE WEST OF GRID 5. VERIFY.
59. SHEET S3.9; SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: THE BEAM INDICATOR B3 IS MISSING ON THE PLAN ON GRID G.1 AND GRID 6. VERIFY.
60. SHEET S3.9; SEVENTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: A CORRIDOR WALL BETWEEN GRIDS 5 AND 6 IS DENOTED AS PSW1. CLARIFY.
61. SHEET S3.9; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 13 INDICATED ON THE PLAN IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
62. SHEET S3.9; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTES 2, 3, 13, AND 14 WERE NOT FOUND ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
63. SHEET S3.9; FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 622 AT GRIDS 1 AND D IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
64. SHEET S3.9; FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 621 AT GRIDS 3 AND C.9 IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
65. SHEET S3.9; FRAMING PLAN: DETAILS 621 AND 621A ARE INDICATED AT SEVERAL EXTERIOR WALL STUD LOCATIONS ON THE PLAN. THESE ARE NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
66. SHEET S3.9; FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 604 IS INDICATED AT SEVERAL INTERIOR STUD WALL LOCATIONS ON THE PLAN. THESE ARE SIMILAR UNLESS CUT AT A DOUBLE STUD WALL (GRID 4). REVISE DETAIL NOTATIONS.
67. SHEET S3.10; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTES 3 AND 10 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
68. SHEET S3.10; FRAMING PLAN: NOTE 13 AT TWO LOCATIONS ON THE INTERIOR CORRIDOR WALL IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
69. SHEET S3.10; FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 612 CUT AT THE WEST WALL OF THE ELEVATOR IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
70. SHEET S3.10; FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 636 SIM IS CUT IN TWO LOCATIONS AT THE ELEVATOR. THESE ARE DRAG TRUSSES AND SHOULD HAVE A DETAIL (NOT SIMILAR) CUT AT THESE LOCATIONS.
71. SHEET S3.10; FRAMING PLAN: THE WEST STAIR IS DENOTED ON THE PLAN AS STAIR #2. REVISE.
72. SHEET S3.10; FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 636 SIM IS CUT IN TWO LOCATIONS AT THE EAST STAIR. ARE THESE CORRECT? VERIFY.
73. SHEET S3.13; ELEVATION D: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE REINFORCING DIMENSIONS.
74. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 207: ADD THE THICKNESS OF THE SLAB AND THE SLAB REINFORCING TO THE DETAIL, OR PROVIDE A REFERENCE.
75. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 207: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DIMENSIONS.
76. SHEET S4.0; DETAILS 201 THROUGH 207: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DIMENSIONS.
77. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 212: PROVIDE VERBIAGE TO THE NOTE INDICATOR AT THE FOOTING.
78. SHEET S4.1; DETAILS 213 AND 215: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DIMENSIONS AND NOTES.
79. SHEET S5.0; DETAIL 401: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE WELD CALL-OUT.
80. SHEET S5.0; DETAILS 405, 406, AND 407: A NOTE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SLAB REFERENCES DETAIL 404. EXPLAIN.
81. SHEET S5.0; DETAIL 417: ADD A REFERENCE FOR THE SLAB EMBEDMENT PLATE AND ANCHORS.
82. SHEET S5.0; DETAIL 417: CALL OUT THE TOP BOND BEAM.
83. SHEET S5.0; DETAIL 417: SHOULD THE LOWER BOND BEAM BE 16" DEEP WITH 4-#5? VERIFY.
84. SHEET S5.0; DETAIL 418: REVISE THE BOND BEAM SHOWN WITH THE NOTE.
85. SHEET S5.0; DETAIL 419: EXPLAIN THE NOTE 'STEEL STUD EXTEND BAR 4'-0" AS SHOWN'.
86. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 428: PROVIDE THE SPACING OF THE 3/4" DIAMETER HEADED STUDS.
87. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 428: THE HEADED STUD AT THE CLOSURE PLATE INDICATES A 6" LENGTH, BUT THE NOTE ALSO INDICATES A MINIMUM 8" EMBEDMENT. CLARIFY.
88. SHEET S5.1; DETAILS 425 AND 429: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE DIMENSIONS.
89. SHEETS S5.2 AND S5.3: DETAILS ARE REPEATED ON THESE TWO SHEETS. REVISE.
90. SHEET S5.2; DETAIL 461: A NOTE REFERENCES DETAIL 413 FOR THE SLAB TO WALL CONNECTION. REVISE.
91. SHEET S5.2; DETAIL 462: PROVIDE A SPECIFIC DETAIL REFERENCE FOR THE SLAB TO CMU WALL CONNECTION.
92. SHEET S5.3; DETAIL 456: PROVIDE A SPECIFIC DETAIL REFERENCE FOR THE SLAB TO WALL CONNECTION.
93. SHEET S5.3; DETAIL 460: PROVIDE THE SPACING OF THE 3/4" DIAMETER HEADED STUDS AT THE 6X6 ANGLE.
94. SHEET S5.3; DETAIL 461: A NOTE REFERENCES DETAIL 413 FOR THE SLAB TO WALL CONNECTION. REVISE.
95. SHEET S5.3; DETAIL 462: PROVIDE A SPECIFIC DETAIL REFERENCE FOR THE SLAB TO WALL CONNECTION.
96. SHEET S6.0; DETAIL 601: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE WELD CALL-OUT.
97. SHEET S6.0; DETAILS 611 AND 612: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DIMENSIONS.
98. SHEET S6.0; DETAIL 618: REFERENCE THE JOIST BEARING ANGLE.
99. SHEET S6.0; DETAILS 619 AND 620: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAILS.
100. SHEET S6.1; DETAIL 627: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL.
101. SHEET S6.1; DETAIL 628: PROVIDE A SPECIFIC DETAIL REFERENCE FOR THE HSS3X3 BLOCKING SLIP CONNECTION.
102. SHEET S6.1; DETAIL 629: PROVIDE THE SPACING OF THE 3/4" DIAMETER HEADED STUDS AT THE 6X6 ANGLE.
103. SHEET S6.1; DETAIL 635: PROVIDE THE LENGTH OF THE 7/8" DIAMETER HEADED STUDS AT THE WELD PLATE.
104. SHEET S6.1; DETAIL 635: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE WELD PLATE VERBIAGE.
105: SHEET S6.1; DETAIL 638: A NOTE REFERENCES DETAIL 214 FOR THE DECK CONNECTION. REVISE.
106. SHEET S7.0; STAIR #1 ROOF LEVEL: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE PLAN NOTES.
107. SHEET S7.1 (PLANS); SHEET S7.2 (DETAILS 702 AND 704): THE DETAILS DO NOT SHOW UP ON ANY STAIR PLAN. VERIFY.
108. GENERAL: IT APPEARS THE FOOTING REINFORCING INDICATED IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR SEVERAL FOOTINGS DIFFERS FROM THE FOOTING REINFORCING INDICATED IN THE FOOTING SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.10. VERIFY AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
109. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 17: BEAM DB7 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE CALCULATION KEY PLAN. VERIFY.
110. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
END OF STRUCTURAL COMMENTS
08/14/2012 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed
08/22/2012 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved Called Arct. office on 8/10 and asked for Spec. Book. Could not find it with submittal.-KB
08/23/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Provide a letter from Tucson Water that approves the installation of the reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies inside of the building. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf
2. Provide a specification for fixture P-9A, located on the 5th, 6th, and 7th floors. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Clarify the equipment call-outs B-1 and B-2 on sheets P110, P210, and P501 - are these actually the WH-1 and WH-2 units shown on the domestic water boiler schedule? Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. Complete riser diagrams 5/P402, 7/P402, and 9/P402; show the connections of these stacks to adjacent stacks and coordinate with the plumbing plans on sheet P107. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
5. Provide labels for the piping shown on sheet P104. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
6. Correct the sheet references in detail 1/P301. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
7. Clarify the termination point for the downstream vent of the gravity grease interceptor. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
8. Coordinate the water pressure calculations with the piping design shown on the drawings and include the required residual water pressure prior to determining the pressure loss available for friction. Reference: Section 610.0, UPC 2006.
9. Provide a downstream cleanout for the proposed gravity grease interceptor. Reference: Sections 707.4 and 707.8, UPC 2006.
10. Fixtures located on floor levels located more than 12" higher than the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole shall not drain through a backwater valve. Reference: Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
11. On sheet P210, boilers B-1 and B-2 are shown as having natural gas inputs of 1560 CFH. If this is correct, revise the size of the natural gas pipes serving the boilers. The natural gas meter for the boilers ("water heaters"), as shown on sheet P203, appears to be providing only 300 CFH of low pressure (< 2 PSI) gas. Reference: Section 1217.0, UPC 2006.
12. Provide a design for the roof drainage piping. Show the size, route, and termination points for the rainwater and overflow conductors. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006.
13. Clarify the design intent for the main sump pump discharge; what is the size of the discharge pipe (6" on detail 1/P502 and 2" on sheet P101) and where does the pipe terminate?
08/23/2012 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
08/24/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (e.g. wall types, etc.). Reference: Section 502, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Coordinate the architectural background for sheet M104 with regard to the equipment room next to the elevator shafts. Reference: section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
3. Revise the sequence of operation for the ventilation of the enclosed parking garage per Section 404, IMC 2006. The minimum ventilation for the space is 0.05 CFM per square foot of floor area and the system shall increase the ventilation rate to 1.5 CFM per square foot of floor area upon detection of either vehicle movement or the presence of occupants.
4. Show how the clothes dryer exhaust ducts are able to maintain the fire-resistance-rating of the floor-ceiling assemblies that they penetrate and the fire-resistance-rated demising walls in which they are located. Reference: Section 504.2, IMC 2006.
5. Revise the design for the termination of the clothes dryer exhausts to eliminate the insect screen. Reference: Section 504.4, IMC 2006.
6. Provide a listed fire/smoke damper for each duct penetration of the shaft enclosing the outside air ducts for the corridor ventilation system. Reference: Section 607.5.5, IMC 2006.
7. Detail 8/M302 sows an exhaust duct shaft with a gravity relief hood mounted at the top of the shaft. Show how continuous upward airflow is to be ensured in the exhaust duct shaft. Reference: Section 607.5.5, exceptions 1.1 and 2, IMC 2006. (Note that the exhaust duct shaft serving units 512, 612, and 712 does not appear to be located in the same location as the relief hood on the roof.)
8. Show the location of the elevator equipment room. Reference: Section 3006, IBC 2006.
08/28/2012 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
08/30/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1: ONE EAST BROADWAY - DP12-0075
2: BASEMENT LEVEL #1 & #2 - PARKING - 1ST FLOOR PARKING & SHELL RETAIL - 2ND, 3RD & 4TH FLOOR SHELL OFFICES -5TH, 6TH & 7TH FLOOR- APARTMENTS (540 WW FU'S)
3: ISSUED WITH CAPACITY RESPONSE #12-099 PER LETTER DATED 6/15/12 PER PCRWRD/MH - CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER WITH 3-4" HCS - OK PER PCRWRD/ERIC WIEDUWILT 08/30/12
4: NEED WATER METER UPSIZING FORM FOR WASTEWATER FEE CALCULATION - CONNECTION TO 2-2" EXISTING WATER METERS PER PLUMBING DRAWING P203 - WATER METERS MAY HAVE BEEN RECENTLY INSTALLED FOR THIS PROJECT.
5: NEED TO CLARIFY THAT ELEVATOR DRAIN AND AREA DRAINS ON DRAWING P101 ARE ROUTED TO STORM SEWER AND NOT TO PUBLIC SEWER
6: NEED TO WORK WITH PCRWRD/IWC/TOM TOMCHAK FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A GREASE INTERCEPTOR FOR THE 1ST FLOOR SHELL TO PREVENT FUTURE PROBLEMS WHEN THE T.I. IS SUBMITTED - 724-6200/3035 W EL CAMINO DEL CERRO

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/31/2012 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed