Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM04619
Parcel: 126134810

Address:
4635 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T12CM04619
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/01/2012 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Verify building contains fire sprinklers and indicate on plans. Modications to sprinklers are a deferred submittal. Please indicate on plans.
08/02/2012 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SHEET T1
1. Please identify all buildings as noted in sheets T1 and C1.2.
2. A separate permit must be obtained for the demolition of Buildings 1 and 4.
3. Please provide a correct and comprehensive building area analysis and building use analysis based upon the 2006 IBC, Table 1004.1.1 that reflects the project as being modified today, not as from previous project analysis.
a. Please provide total square footage of building demolition.
b. Please show the enclosed canopy as Added Square Footage to Buildings 2 and 3.
c. For building 2, does the 6,512 s.f. include the 1,860 s.f. for the enclosed service area?
d. Please provide a new occupant load calculation based upon the new occupancy use clarification and occupancy load calculation.
e. Please recalculate and identify the required exits.
f. Please recalculate the required plumbing fixtures.
g. Please provide an Exiting plan based upon the new occupancy load calculation.
h. There is not 12,869 s.f. of S-1. Rework all building s.f. and present an accurate building data analysis.
4. A bottled water dispenser is not an acceptable substitute for the required drinking fountain. A "Point of Use" water dispenser with a 1/4" water line connected is acceptable. Please show the location of the architectural, plumbing and electrical plans.
5. Please provide a letter to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose, summarizing the deferred submittals for his approval.
6. Please confirm wither this building is sprinklered or not?
7. What is section 302.3.2? There is no such section in the 2006 IBC. Please clarify.
SHEET C1
8. Please provide a new ramp at the North end of the marked crossing and detectable warnings at both ends of the marked crossing.
SHEET A1
9. The correct scale of the floor plan is 1/8" not 1/16". Please reconcile.
10. As per your square footage calculations, buildings 2 and 3 are now 15,400 s.f. This is well over the maximum 9,000 s.f. allowed by Table 503 for a "B" occupancy, type VB, non sprinklered building and will require a rated fire separation.
a. As per the original building documents, they were approved as an IIIB building classification. You may want to reconsider the VB and maintain a IIIB. The allowable maximum here is 19,000 s.f. Your other alternative is to sprinkle the building. This allows you 3 times the 9,000 s.f. in size.
SHEET A4
11. Please show how detail 9 complies with the 2006 IBC code requirement of 5psi lateral load, Section 1607.13.
SHEET A5
12. Change the 1/4" scale to 3/8" scale.
13. The toilet rooms are not code compliant:
a. The clearance are both men and women's accessible water closet are not correct.
b. The clearance at the women's toilet entrance door strike side does not comply with ANSI 117.1, Section 404.2.3.1, and figure b.
c. The 5' turning radii in the men's rooms cut too deep into the lavatory to meet requirements of section 306.3 elevation a.
d. The urinal stall must be 3'-0" wide as required by section 605.3 and 305.
SHEET A7
14. Any roof top mounted equipment must be 10' from the roof edge or have a guard rail 42" high.
SHEET S0.1
15. Please provide certification of special inspectors.
16. Please provide structural calculations for all new and/or relocated roof top mounted HVAC equipment.
END OF REVIEW
08/13/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
08/13/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Provide the minimum plumbing facilities (e.g. drinking fountain) required by Table 2902.1 and Section 2902.2, IBC 2006, for B and S1 occupancies. See also, Section 1109.5.1, IBC 2006.
08/13/2012 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
08/14/2012 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T12CM04619
4635 E 22nd ST
TI Car DealerShip

1. Service increase of this capacity requires a Fault Current Analysis from new service to existing panels. Since all panels are existing and show 22K aic ratings, how are fault levels brough down to safe levels ?
2. Since existing panels are to be re-fed, will feeders remain the same or be re-pulled ? If new and re-pulled indicate size of wire and conduit.
3. Provide a ground system for the new service ,size and indicate what it is to be connected to it.

Ray T Majuta
Elect Pln Ck
DPD, C of Tuc
8/14/2012
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
08/16/2012 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
08/22/2012 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: T12CM04619
4635 E. 22nd St.
TI: Car Dealership

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 08-24-12

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Because of the changes being made to the site, a Development Package meeting the requirements of Development Standards 2-01 will be required to be submitted and approved prior to approval of the building plans.

2. Zoning acknowledges that a Temporary Revocable Easement is in place for the parking or display area in the right of way. Provide a copy of the TRE for review and clearly indicate the boundaries of the TRE on the site plan.

3. Per a search of the county assessors records this property contains 6 separate tax parcels. A tax parcel combination may be required. At a minimum a Covenant Regarding the Development and Use of Real Property will be required to be recorded. If the covenant is to be used provide the recording information (sequence number) on the site plan. If a tax combination is provided remove all parcel property lines from the plan. If the covenant is provided clearly indicate the location, with distance and bearings, of all property lines.

4. The site plan submitted indicates an Alleyway(Public) connecting to the east. This is not a public alley but part of the parcel with an easement over the parcel for ingress/egress.

5. The parking calculations provided on sheet C1 do not match any LUC code requirement. Since this is less than 25% expansion the parking calculations from the last approved site plan may be used.

Clearly indicate the location of the required and provided parking spaces separate from the parking spaces for display or storage.

Clearly indicate the location of the handicap parking spaces as well as access aisles.

Provide a dimensioned detail of a standard parking space and handicap parking space.

6. Indicate the location of the loading zone as per the last approved site plan.

7. Indicate the width of all parking area access lanes (PAALs).

8. Even though the building expansion will be in the negative, provide expansion calculations for the entire site as this plan will become the base plan for any future expansions.

9. Provide the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculations for the entire site. (allowed and provided)

10. The new sidewalk along the south side of the building will require a handicap ramp connecting to the crosswalk. Provide details.

11. The above comments are not a complete review for the required development package (site plan). Further comments may apply based on submittal of the development package.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T12CM04619.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
08/27/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved