Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM03758
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/07/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 2: THE IBC SECTION 1017 REQUIRES THE CORRIDOR TO BE ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED (PER YOUR RESPONSE). HOWEVER, KEYNOTE 12 ON SHEET A-1 INDICATES THE WALL ONLY EXTENDS TO 6" ABOVE THE CEILING. PER THE IBC SECTION 708.4 , EXTEND THE FIRE PARTITION TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF SHEATHING, OR THE CORRIDOR CEILING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED THE SAME AS THE ONE HOUR WALLS (EXCEPTION 3). VERIFY AND REVISE THE DRAWING. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 5: A SECTION K/A-9 HAS BEEN CUT THROUGH THE OFFICE WINDOW. DETAIL K ON SHEET A-9 IS A RESTROOM SIGN DETAIL. REVISE THE SECTION CUT REFERENCE. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 6: REFERENCE KEYNOTE 11A IN THE KEYNOTES. AT THIS TIME, THERE IS NO KEYNOTE 11A. ADD THAT NOTE. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 7: KEYNOTE 24 STILL REFERENCES DETAIL 8/5. WHERE IS THIS DETAIL (THERE IS NO SHEET 5)? REVISE KEYNOTE REFERENCE. 5. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: DETAIL 1/A-4 IS STILL INDICATED ON SECTION 1/A-3, BUT IS INCORRECT (DETAIL 1/A-4 IS AT THE MENU BOARD HEADER). REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE. 6. PREVIOUS COMMENT 17: DETAIL 9/A-7 IS STILL REFERENCED AT THE AWNING ON SECTION 1/A-6. THERE STILL IS NO DETAIL 9 ON SHEET A-7. REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE. 7. PREVIOUS COMMENT 20: THE DETAIL REFERENCE 3/A-7 AT THE WALL SILL PLATE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM SECTIONS 1, 2, AND 3 ON SHEET A-6. ADD A DETAIL TO THE DRAWINGS FOR THIS CONDITION. 8. PREVIOUS COMMENT 21: THE DETAIL REFERENCE 6/A-7 AT THE WALL SILL PLATE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM SECTION 4 (PREVIOUSLY 3.1) ON SHEET A-6. ADD A DETAIL TO THE DRAWINGS FOR THIS CONDITION. 9. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/13/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/14/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide cleanouts sized per Section 707.11, UPC 2006 (i.e. a 4" pipe requires at least a 3.5" cleanout). [Original comment: Coordinate the plumbing plans and riser diagrams. Show all of the cleanouts on the riser diagrams. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.] 2. Revise the size of the common gas pipe serving the fryers per Table 12-8 at a developed length of 70 feet. [Original comment: Correct the pipe sizes for the natural gas system per Table 12-8, UPC 2006.] 3. Coordinate the delivery temperatures shown in the water supply riser diagram with detail 2/P.4 and the plumbing plans. [Original comment: Coordinate the delivery temperatures shown in detail 2/P.4 with the plumbing plans and the water supply riser diagram. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.] 4. Section 803.0, UPC 2006 requires that indirect waste pipes exceeding 5'-0" but shorter than 15'-0" shall be trapped but not vented. Indirect waste pipes 15'-0" or longer shall be trapped, vented, and the vent shall not be connected to any sewer-connected vent. [Original comment: Show that the indirect plumbing waste piping complies with the requirements of Section 803.0, UPC 2006 with respect to length.] 5. Update the "Roof Downspout Calculations" and change the scupper dimensions on detail 4/A-5 to correspond to the revised scupper dimensions. [Original comment: Revise the size of the primary scuppers to comply with the size requirements of Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006.] |
| 08/14/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Burger King - 8702 E. Broadway T12CM03758 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 14, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 08/16/2012 | CAGUILA1 | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |