Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM03078
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/31/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/06/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET C-1; APPLICABLE CODES: REMOVE THE REFERENCES TO CODES NOT RELEVANT TO THIS PROJECT. 2. SHEET A-1; FLOOR PLAN: REVISE THE SCALE UNDER THE FLOOR PLAN TITLE (SHOULD BE 1/4"). 3. SHEET A-1; FLOOR PLAN: THERE IS A DIMENSION LINE OUTSIDE OF THE RESTROOMS AND SNACK AREA THAT NEEDS TO HAVE DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN FEET AND INCHES (NOT 20", BUT 1'-8", ETC.). 4. SHEET A-1; FLOOR PLAN: THE ELEVATION 2/A4 SHOWN IN THE SNACK AREA IS INCORRECT. REVISE. 5. SHEET A-1 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A-3 (EAST/WEST BUILDING SECTION): THE BUILDING SECTION CUT IS SHOWN AS 4/A3 ON THE PLAN, BUT THE SECTION ON A-3 IS NOT NUMBERED. REVISE. 6. SHEET A-4; SHOWER ELEVATIONS: INDICATE THE SHOWER CONTROL AND HANDSHOWER LOCATIONS PER THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURES 608.5.2 OR 608.5.3. 7. GENERAL: ON THE DRAWINGS, PROVIDE MATERIAL STRENGTHS, GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS, DESIGN LOADS, ETC., AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 106 OF THE 2006 IBC. 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT USED IN THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. 9. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/08/2012 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 06/14/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shown on the drawings shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Include the roll-up doors and skylights in the calculations. Reference: Section 502, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Provide structural details to show how the fan coil units are to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 3. The single-zone system ventilation calculations used on sheet M-3 for the stage and the multiuse assembly area are not appropriate for a multiple-zone system and therefore equation 6.2.3, ASHRAE 62.1-2004 cannot be used to determine the proper amount of outside air to be delivered by the two heat pumps. Multiple-zone systems shall use Sections 6.2.5.1 through 6.2.5.4, ASHRAE 62.1-2004 to determine the total amount of outside to be delivered to the zones. |
| 06/14/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/14/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the connection point of the 2" drain from P-1A as shown in detail B/P-22 with respect to the location of the trap arm for P-2T. Reference: Section 311.4, UPC 2006. 2. Provide protection of the trap seals for all floor drains subject to infrequent use. Pro-vent Trap Guards (detail 211) are not approved for use in the City of Tucson. Reference: Sections 316.4, 1007.0, and 1007.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Show that the restroom floors slope toward the floor drains. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006. 4. The civil site plan (Sheet 4 of 6) indicates that both building sewers are to be equipped with a backwater valve. Specify the type of backwater valve to be installed and provide a vent and cleanout downstream of each backwater valve. Reference: Sections 710.6, 719.1, and 904.1, UPC 2006. 5. Clarify the configuration of the traps, trap arms and drain piping for the three lavatories in the women's restroom. Reference: Sections 1001.1 and 1001.2, UPC 2006. 6. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Architectural detail 11/A-5 indicates that a valley gutter is being installed with roof drains located in the gutter but no dimensions have been provided and it is not clear how overflow protection for the roof is being provided or if the primary and secondary leaders are independent. Reference: Sections 1101.11, 1105.0, and 1106.0, UPC 2006. |
| 06/21/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM03078 9415 E Wrightstown RD New Maint Blgd. 1. Indicate on Sheet E-3 how the existing loads on the SES were obtained. 2. Indicate on Sheet E-3 the location of the SES, and length to the new Maint Bldg service. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, C of Tucson 6/25/2012 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/28/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/02/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |