Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T12CM02728
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/04/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building Plan will be stamped approved upon aproval of the development plan package, DP12-0144. |
| 09/18/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET 1; CODE CHECK: THE NEW SHADE CANOPY IS LISTED ON THIS SHEET AS 1520 SF, WHILE THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS INDICATE A 40' X 40' STRUCTURE (1600 SF). CLARIFY. 2. SHEET S1.2: THE 30' X 40' STRUCTURE IS INDICATED ON THIS SHEET, BUT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECT VALUATION, OR INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN. CLARIFY. 3. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE COVER SHEET INDICATES A 40' X 40' STRUCTURE AND A 30' X 40' STRUCTURE. IS THERE A SECOND STRUCTURE IN THIS PROJECT? VERIFY. 4. SHEET S2.1; DETAIL 101: THE DETAIL INDICATES THE CHAIN HAS A 3 TON CAPACITY. IS THIS FOR TENSION (UPLIFT)? WHAT IS THE SHEAR CAPACITY OF THE CHAIN, AND THE ACTUAL DESIGN SHEAR? VERIFY. 5. SHEET S2.1; TRUSSES "A", "B", AND "C": THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE LETTERING FOR THE VERTICAL WEB MEMBER SIZES. 6. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/26/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning cannot approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/15/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |
| 12/28/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |