Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM02063
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/30/2012 | CARL SCHULTZ | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1.The Fire and Life Safety sheets need to have a wall legend to match. 2. My suggestion is to have the designer and the Fire Code Administrator set up a meeting to review the plans. We have more questions than answers. |
| 04/30/2012 | CARL SCHULTZ | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The required fire flow is 2,875 gpm for 2hours at 20psi residual pressure. Please indicate on site plan the nearest three fire hydrants to be utilized for this project. 2. Remove notes on FLS00r that state fire sprinklers are not required for "M" occupancies. 3. The legend on sheet FLS01r and FLS02r do not match the walls shown on same pages. 4. Show egress paths and exit signs on Fire and Life Safety page FLS01r. Include existing and new exit signs and egress lighting. 5. Change language on FLS02r to "proposed" not the "existing" shown. The residential shown is new. 6. Exit door swings wrong way on sheet FLS02r from S-1 to corridor. 7. On sheet FLS03r Level 5: based on occupant load numbers provided the amount of egress width is not provided for the stairway door and the stairway. Please review section 1023 if this is going to be an exterior stairway for compliance . Additional items may be added after second submittal based on revised drawings and code issues. |
| 05/01/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | GENERAL 1. Because of incomplete documents a thorough and accurate review could not be conducted. The review comments below are not to be considered as a complete and final review. Additional comments will be included upon the next completed submittal. 2. Please provide the 2 part special inspection certification form for approval of the selected inspectors. 3. Please send a summary of your intended deferred submittals (plywood web joists and wood trusses) on your letter head stationary to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose. SHEET FLS00r 4. The RAIL YARD SITE CODE SUMMARY indicates a mixed use of mercantile and parking on the first level. There are no drawings that show any addition on the ground level except the two new stair wells and a lobby on the east end. If this is a future addition, please eliminate it from the square footage summary or add it to the drawings so it may be review for code compliance for exiting and fire life safety. a. Ditto for any future second level additions. 5. Please provide an accurate occupant load summary for the project. SHEET FLS01r 6. Both these floor plans need to be finished. Please show all existing parking elements, pedestrian ways, connection to pedestrian ways from the new lobby and new stair wells, extend the life safety exiting elements to the ground level, any future mercantile/office additions and auto entrances/exits, pedestrian access across the street and etc. 7. Please extend and complete the fire life safety explanation as shown on sheet FLS03r. 8. Please complete the exiting occupancy loads and show all doors required for exiting in all stair shafts and landings. 9. Please show the fire rating for a dashed line partition and adjust your fire partition schedule to match your floor plans. SHEET A201r 10. Finish showing the new construction for the first level which includes the west stair well and any mercantile and or business additions intended. 11. Provide a second level floor plan. 12. It would be nice to see the existing elements of the parking garage floor plan attached to the new construction. 13. Please review all partition references and code required fire ratings as per the fire resistance ratings shown on sheet FLS00r and correct all discrepancies. a. As scheduled per table 601, all exterior bearing walls are to have a 2 hour rating for the IIIA building portion of this project. On both details 3 and 4/ A201r, all exterior partitions are reference to partition type 7A which is indicated on sheet A400a as a non-rated, non bearing partition. Structural drawings show this exterior partition to be bearing. 14. Show partition types for all stair well and elevator shafts. SHEETS A205Ar AND A205Br 15. Please review all partition references and code required fire ratings as per the fire resistance ratings shown on sheet FLS00r and correct all discrepancies. a. As scheduled per table 601, all exterior bearing walls are to have a 2 hour rating for the IIIA building portion of the project.. On both details 01/A250Ar and 01/A250Br, all exterior partitions are reference to partition type 5A which is indicated on sheet A400a as a non-rated, non bearing partition. Structural drawings show this exterior partition to be bearing. SHEETS A206r AND A207r 16. Please finish these floor plans. SHEETS A301r THROUGH A323r 17. Please finish these sheets as needed for notes, finishes, references and general detailing. SHEET A400dr 18. Please finish the door and room finish schedules, notes and details. SHEETA450 19. Coordinate all stair details and accessible requirements shown here to all stair details shown on sheets A520r and A521r. SHEETS A501r THROUGH A506r 20. For each unit floor plan shown please reference to each applicable accessible kitchen and toilet detail copied and shown on sheets A600A and A700 SHEET 520r 21. Please finish the stair details and references. SHEET A521R 22. Ditto Comment 20 23. For stair "C", please provide areas of rescue as required by Section 1007.3. SHEET A522r 24. Please finish the elevator shaft details. SHEETS A530r THROUGH A532r 25. Please explain the purpose of providing large scale details of all the corridors. SHEET A600A 26. Please provide actual designed toilet elevations and reference all the accessible details shown on this sheet to these elevations. 27. SHEET S002; SPECIAL INSPECTION: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE STARTING AT STEEL NOTE 6 AND CONTINUING DOWN. 28. SHEET S002; SPECIAL INSPECTION: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 29. SHEET S101r; FOUNDATION PLAN: PROVIDE GRID LINES FOR THE EAST-WEST DIRECTION. 30. SHEETS S101r, S102r, S103r, AND S104r; PLANS: THE WEST WALL OF THE ELEVATOR IS DIFFERENT ON S101r (EXTENDS WEST OF GRID E10) THAN ON S102r, S103r, AND S104r (EAST OF GRID E10). CLARIFY. 31. SHEETS S101r, S102r, S103r, AND S104r; PLANS: THE SOUTH WALL OF THE ELEVATOR IS DIFFERENT ON S101r (DOES NOT EXTEND SOUTH TO THE STAIR WALL) THAN ON S102r, S103r, AND S104r (ALIGN WITH SOUTH STAIR WALL). CLARIFY. 32. SHEET S101r (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: NO CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THE MASONRY WALL DESIGN AND FOOTING DESIGN AT THE ELEVATOR/STAIR AREAS. PROVIDE. 33. SHEET S101r; FOUNDATION PLAN: A NOTE AT THE WEST STAIR INDICATES TO "STEP FOOTING AS REQUIRED TO MATCH BOTTOM OF EXISTING FOOTING". VERIFY THAT THE STEP OF THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF DETAIL 22/S004. THE BOTTOM OF FOOTING INDICATED FOR THE NEW FOOTING IS -7'-3", WHILE ADJACENT FOOTINGS INDICATE -8'-9" AND -7'-6". IS THE STEP FOOTING REQUIRED WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLAN? 34. SHEET S101r; FOUNDATION NOTES: NOTE 7 INDICATES TO SEE THE COLUMN SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET. REVISE NOTE. 35. SHEET S101r; FOUNDATION NOTES: IS NOTE 12 PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT? VERIFY. 36. SHEET S101r; FOUNDATION PLAN: AT THE WEST STAIR, PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE FOOTING ON THE NORTH STAIR WALL (HOW FAR WEST OF GRID E3, AND HOW FAR WEST OF GRID E4). 37. SHEET S102r; FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE GRID LINES FOR THE EAST-WEST DIRECTION. 38. SHEET S103r; FLOOR FRAMING NOTES: NOTE 4 INDICATES TO SEE THE COLUMN SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET. REVISE NOTE. 39. SHEET S103r; FLOOR FRAMING NOTES: NOTE 5 INDICATES TO SEE THE BEAM SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET. REVISE NOTE. 40. SHEET S103r (FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S502 (DETAIL 223A): THERE IS NO DETAIL 223A INDICATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY WHERE THAT CONDITION OCCURS. |
| 05/03/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/04/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 345 E Congress Street T12CM02063 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 4, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and it appears that the proposed building match the development package for this project. Due to the amount of comments from other PDSD agencies zoning will not stamp and approve the building plans at this time. Once all other PDSD agencies have approved the building plan Zoning will approve. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 05/04/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the plumbing code to be used for this activity. The City of Tucson allows either the 2006 UPC or the 2006 IPC (both with local amendments) to be used but the documents must indicate which code is being used. This review has been made using the 2006 UPC which was the code used for the parking garage. 2. Water heaters with inputs of 200,000 BTUH or greater are classified as boilers and require approval from the Arizona Boiler inspector. Reference: Title 20, Chapter 5, Article 4, Arizona Administrative Code. 3. Provide structural calculations to show that the boilers and the hot water storage vessel are safely supported by the roof. Reference: Section 310.0, UPC 2006. 4. Provide fixture descriptions for all plumbing fixtures. All plumbing fixtures and fittings shall be listed or labeled by a nationally-recognized, accredited conformity assessment company (e.g. UL, ETL, UPC, etc) Reference: Sections 301.1.1 and 401.1, UPC 2006.Provide installation details for the booster pump for the water distribution system. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 609.8, UPC 2006. 5. Provide a vacuum relief for hot water storage-vessel. Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006. 6. Verify the water demand and fixture unit calculations on sheet P401R; the number of fixtures used in the calculations does not agree with the architectural drawings. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 7. Verify the water pressure calculations. A static lift of 180-feet from the booster pump to the highest outlet in a building with a total height of less than 85-feet seems unlikely and a developed length of 700-feet seems generous. Reference: Sections 610.1 and 610.5, UPC 2006. 8. Water distribution from the booster pumps to the "last PRV" is specified to be done with Type L copper tubing. Verify that the tubing sizes shown on sheet P401R will not exceed the calculated pressure loss of 8.0 PSI per 100 feet and will not exceed a velocity of 8 FPS. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 9. Water distribution in the dwelling units is specified to be done with PEX tubing. Verify that the tubing sizes shown on sheet P401R (from the "PRV valve last fixture") will not exceed the calculated pressure loss of 8.30 PSI per 100 feet and will not exceed a velocity of 8 FPS. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 10. Provide a roof drainage design for the elevator and stairway enclosure located on the southeast corner of the building. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006. 11. Provide sizing information for the gutters and downspouts shown on sheet A208R. Reference: Section 1106.0, UPC 2006. 12. The 6" horizontal roof drain leader located near column RD-R7 on the fifth level is conveying the drainage from 7150 square feet of roof at a slope of 1/8" per foot, not the 7100 square feet of roof shown on sheet P205R. Correct the addition and resolve to capacity issue. (Note that the existing horizontal 6" roof drain leaders to which this new roof drain leader is to connect, have been installed with a 2% slope.) Reference: Section 1106.2, UPC 2006. |
| 05/07/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Coordinate the scheduled outside air quantities for HP-R1 and HP-R2 on sheet M401r per the outside air calculations shown on sheets M205r, M206r, and M207r. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 AND 403.3, IMC 2006. 3. Show that the equivalent length of the dryer exhaust ducts does not exceed the maximum length per Section 504.6.1, IMC 2006. 4. Clarify the location of AC-R1 - is it really cantilevered off the top of the elevator shaft? What is the purpose of the unit: no ducts are shown for it. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 5. Show the hoistway venting required per Section 3004.1, IBC 2006. |
| 05/11/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM02063 345 E Congress St Plaza Centos Student Housing The electrical plans have been denied for the following, address each item and indicate how revised. 1. Tucson Electric Utility shows the AIC to be 75,100 aic at utility supply, how does this get to a value of 35,000 aic at new SES-R ? 2. Sheet E403r, all the values in the Short Current Calculation Table are missing, please provide. 3. Provide the size of conductors and conduits for the service entrance conductors, they are provided by the customer here. 4. Sheet E401r shows new SES-R, Sheet E403r shows same as SES-H ? 5. Provide notation on Sheet E 401r that labeling on services to comply with 2005 NEC 230.2.E. 6. All panels show only phase A and B used, since the distribution system will be 3 phase to the Bus and disconnects on each floor, phase C has to be rotated as being used as one of the phases for the individual panels. Provide a rotation schedule showing which unit panels are to use A,B then A,C then B,C. 7. Provide notation on Sheet E403r showing phases have been balanced . Values to conform with phase loads on Panel SES-R. 8. Sheet E-600r Panel SES-R, breaker feeding Panel SB should be 400 amps not 1200 amps. 9. Sheet E600r Panel SB circuit 18 used in E209r, marked spare in Panel. 10. Indicate where FACP is located and assign a circuit and panel to it's feeder branch circuit. Ray T Majuta Electrical Plan Review PDSD, City of Tucson 5/14/12 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/21/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEEDS CAPCITY |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/26/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |