Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM02061
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/10/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Compliance with the 2006 IFC is required. Fire Sprinkler system shall be a NFPA 13 system. Standpipes and Fire alarm systems are required. Generator permit is required for emergency lighting. |
| 07/12/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | STRUCTURAL COMMENTS ERIC NEWCOMB 1. SHEET S103g; FLOOR FRAMING NOTES: NOTES 4, 5, AND 6 INDICATE TO "SEE SCHEDULE THIS SHEET". REVISE NOTES. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 45: ON SHEET S301g, THE SHEARWALL NOTATION OF THE WEST WALL OF THE NORTH STAIR IS STILL NOT LEGIBLE. MOVE NOTATION. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 46: ON SHEET S301g, A SHEARWALL DESIGNATION STILL NEEDS TO BE ADDED TO THE WALL JUST NORTH OF THE EAST STAIR. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 47: SHEARWALL NOTE 6 ON SHEET S301g STILL REFERENCES SHEET S007. REVISE. 5. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. RESUBMITTAL ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS RON BROWN Comment 63: Please provide a completed two part certification form of listed special inspectors for review and approval. Comment 65: In the written response, it states that the trash chute will dump into a 3 hour rated room but the drawings reference 2 hour walls. Two hour walls for this room are more than adequate. Comment 68: Please provide an occupancy load calculation schedule showing the number of occupants for each level per use. Summarize each floor load and provide a grand total. The summary schedule should be similar to the format already presented on Sheet FLS00g, Section 1004, Occupant Load. 1. The provided occupant load summary is a stair exit summary not a building occupant load summary. 2. Please label all the stairs as shown on this summary to all preceding floor plans especially the exiting floor plans shown on Sheets FLS01g and FLS02g. Comment 98: Court Yard and Swimming Pool Structural and Accessibility Review 1. This pool is classified as a semi public and is therefore required to have the following: a. A 5’ high surrounding fence equipped with self closing and latching gates. If the pool occupancy is more than 50 then all gates are to have panic bars as required by Section 1008.1.9. b. As per code requirements, there must be at least two types of pool accessibility, steps, a ramp and/or a lift. 2. I would like to see a large scale detail drawn of each type of stair and ramp configuration with the typical requirement details shown on sheet L108g implemented. a. It does not appear to me that a 2’-3” handrail extension beyond the last ramp slope can be accommodated in the design. b. The step with the gate to the equipment room court yard shows only one handrail. c. Need to see further details showing the required 5’ fence plus gates and effect on the stairs and ramps. 3. The ramp handrails shown in details 4 and 5/L108g need a horizontal bottom railing added no more than 4” above the ramp surface. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/18/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 350 E Congress Street T12CM02061 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 18, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plan and it appears to match the approved development package. Once all PDSD agencies have approved zoning will approve the building plans. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 07/24/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a low-pressure cut-off for the booster pumps per Section 606.5.5, IPC 2006. [Original comment: Provide installation details for the booster pump for the water distribution system. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 303.2, IPC 2006.] 2. The 1" branch piping for the flush-valve water closets (25 GPM per flush) and the ¾" branch piping for the urinals (15 GPM per flush) will result in velocities greater than 8 FPS in the branch pipes. [Original comment: Show that the branch piping sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Reference: Section 604.4 and Table 604.3, IPC 2006.] 3. Clarify how the horizontal branch drains shown in waste and vent diagram 8/P604g are provided with a cleanout. [Original comment: Provide cleanouts for all horizontal drains. Reference: Section 708.3.1, IPC 2006.] 4. Show the cleanouts for the base of each stack on the waste and vent riser diagrams. [Original comment: Provide a cleanout at the base of each waste stack. Reference: Section 708.3.4, IPC 2006.] 5. Clarify how the drain for the dishwasher on the second floor (revised waste and vent diagram 15/P604g) is connected to the waste stack. Reference: Section 711.2, IPC 2006. |
| 07/24/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/27/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/03/2012 | GBONILL1 | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. NEED MANHOLE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPROVAL 740-6369 2. NEED WASTEWATER CREDIT EVALUATION 740-6602 OR 740-6606 IF APPLICAGBLE |