Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM02061
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/24/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 350 E Congress Street T12CM02061 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 20, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 04/30/2012 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | This review includes the residetial, common [amenities] areas. Dan Santa Cruz |
| 05/01/2012 | CARL SCHULTZ | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1.The Fire and Life Safety sheets need to have a legend identifying the rated walls and their locations. 2. FLS00g code summary page mentins 2010 IBC. That code does not exist and the 2006 is the code in effect in the City of Tucson. Both buildings are required to have an automatic fire sprinkler system designed to NFPA 13. NFPA 13R systems are not allowed to be used for area increases or height increases. Revise all indications that an occupancy classification does not require sprinklers, the entire building is required to be fire sprinklered to NFPA 13 standards. 3. Sheets A101g and sheet FLS01g do not match with regards to exit door locations. Please revise. 4. The code section 504.2 exception (1) does not apply to this project. |
| 05/01/2012 | CARL SCHULTZ | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Corrections noted are: 1. Provide approval of the Alternative materials, design, and methods request from the Building Code Officail as indicated on sheet FLS00g 2. Indicate on site plan that 3,750 GPM for 4 hours is the required fire flow and show 4 hydrants that are available or the ones to be added to have the minimum 4. 3. Remove any comments about automatic sprinklers not being required. The entire structure is required to be protected with an approved NFPA 13 sprinkler system and it is confusing that sheet FLS00g is indicating certain occupancies are not required to have this protection. 4. Exception 2 under Section 905 on sheet FLS00g is incorrect. 5. On sheet FLS01g level 1- the sliding door is not approved for exiting. Revise plans. 6. All doors shall swing in the direction of exit travel when serving occupant loads over 50 per IFC 1008.1.2. Please revise. 7. More exit signs are required. Show the additional exit signs in stairwells and corridors that are required. 8. On sheet FLS01g Level 2 Stairwell-(GS2) and A521G I cannot figure out how the interior stairwell connects to the exterior exit staircase and how the fire rating is being maintained to the exit. 9. Exit signs shall be added per IFC 1011.1 and indicate that tactile signs will also be provided per IFC 1011.3. 10. Explain why the vertical exit enclosure (GS1) is provided but it does not exit to exterior of building on Level 1 on sheet FLS01g. See IFC 1019.3 11. Indicate the location of egress lighting and the method on the Fire and Life Safety Pages. 12. Indicate on the Fire and Life Safety Pages the stairway or stairways that have roof access. 13. Indicate elevator car size per IBC 3002.4 14. Revise or provide a legend for the fire rated walls indicated on the FLS pages. |
| 05/03/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S002; SPECIAL INSPECTION: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE STARTING AT STEEL NOTE 6 AND CONTINUING DOWN. 2. SHEET S002; SPECIAL INSPECTION: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 3. SHEET S102g; FRAMING PLAN: THE NORTH AND EAST STAIRS INDICATE COLUMNS SC2 (TWO AT EACH STAIR). WHAT ARE THESE COLUMNS FOR? VERIFY AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED. 4. SHEET S102g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S501 (DETAIL 211): THE DETAIL INDICATES A CONCRETE SLAB AT THE STAIR LANDING, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A FLOOR OPENING AT THE STAIR AND LANDING AREA. CLARIFY AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED. 5. SHEET S102g; FRAMING PLAN: NEAR GRIDS GJ AND G3.5, DETAIL CUT 204 SHOULD BE EXTENDED SOUTH THROUGH THE MASONRY WALL. VERIFY. 6. SHEET S102g (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE ROOF BETWEEN GRIDS GJ AND GK AND GRIDS G1 AND G2. 7. SHEET S102g (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE FRAMING (BEAMS AND COLUMNS) AT THE ELEVATOR. 8. SHEET S102g; FRAMING PLAN: AT THE EAST STAIR, INDICATE THE STEEL COLUMNS ON THE PLAN. 9. SHEET S102g; FRAMING PLAN: AT THE MIDDLE STRIP BETWEEN GRIDS GH AND GL, A NOTE INDICATES #6 AT 12" OC EACH WAY BOTTOM. WHAT AREA IS THIS FOR, AND DOES IT REPLACE THE REINFORCING INDICATED IN "SLAB FRAMING NOTES" 4? VERIFY. 10. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 5): PROVIDE A KEY PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE JOIST DESIGNS INDICATED. THE ONLY JOISTS LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE ARE 11 7/8" TJI AT 24" OC, 2X8 AT 24" OC, AND 2X8 AT 12" OC. 11. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 5): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE "OTHER JOISTS ARE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL", BUT THE PLAN (SHEET S103g) AND SCHEDULE (SHEET S006) INDICATE JOISTS J1, J2, AND J3 ARE 11 7/8" TJI AT 24" OC. WHAT JOISTS ARE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS? VERIFY. 12. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE PLAN DOES NOT CLEARLY DIFFERENTIATE WHERE J1 AND J2 JOISTS BEGIN AND END, AND THE WALLS THAT THESE JOISTS BEAR ON. CLARIFY. 13. SHEET S103g; FLOOR FRAMING NOTES: NOTE 13 INDICATES A SYMBOL USED FOR AXIAL DRAG FORCES, WHILE THE FRAMING PLAN USES THE SAME SYMBOL FOR A DIFFERENT PURPOSE. REVISE. 14. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE JOIST CALL-OUT BETWEEN GRIDS GA AND GC AND GRIDS G2 AND G3.5 CAN NOT BE READ DUE TO THE ROOM DESIGNATION. CLEAR UP. 15. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE JOIST CALL-OUT AT THE SOUTH LANDING OF THE NORTH STAIR CAN NOT BE READ DUE TO THE STAIR DESIGNATION. CLEAR UP. 16. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE JOIST CALL-OUT BETWEEN GRIDS GJ AND GK AND GRIDS G2 AND G3.5 CAN NOT BE READ DUE TO THE ROOM DESIGNATION. CLEAR UP. 17. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE JOIST CALL-OUT BETWEEN GRIDS GJ AND GK AND GRIDS G3.5 AND G6 CAN NOT BE READ DUE TO THE ROOM DESIGNATION. CLEAR UP. 18. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE JOIST CALL-OUT BETWEEN GRIDS GM AND GN.6 AND GRIDS G2 AND G3.5 CAN NOT BE READ DUE TO THE ROOM DESIGNATION. CLEAR UP. 19. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE DETAIL CALL-OUT BETWEEN GRIDS GP AND GR.2 AND GRIDS G3.5 AND G6 CAN NOT BE READ DUE TO THE ROOM DESIGNATION. CLEAR UP. 20. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE BEAM CALL-OUT ON GRID GR.2 AND BETWEEN GRIDS G3.5 AND G6 CAN NOT BE READ DUE TO THE ROOM DESIGNATION. CLEAR UP. 21. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE JOIST CALL-OUT BETWEEN GRIDS GR.9 AND GU AND ON GRID G6 CAN NOT BE READ DUE TO THE ROOM DESIGNATION. CLEAR UP. 22. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE JOIST CALL-OUT BETWEEN GRIDS GP AND GR.2 AND GRIDS G11 AND G11.2 CAN NOT BE READ DUE TO THE ROOM DESIGNATION. CLEAR UP (ALONG WITH THE DETAIL CALL-OUT TO THE EAST). 23. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE JOIST CALL-OUT BETWEEN GRIDS GR.2 AND GR.7 AND GRIDS G11 AND G11.2 CAN NOT BE READ DUE TO THE ROOM DESIGNATION. CLEAR UP. 24. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE JOIST CALL-OUT BETWEEN GRIDS GP AND GR.2 AND GRIDS G11 AND G15 CAN NOT BE READ DUE TO THE ROOM DESIGNATION. CLEAR UP. 25. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 16): BEAM B6 IN THE CALCULATIONS (B1 ON THE FRAMING PLAN AT THE NORTH END OF THE BUILDING-TWO BEAMS THUS) IS LISTED AS A 3 1/8" X 12" GLULAM BEAM, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A 6X12 BEAM. CLARIFY. 26. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 28): BEAM B7 IN THE CALCULATIONS (B1 ON THE FRAMING PLAN AT THE NORTH END OF THE BUILDING-THREE BEAMS THUS) IS LISTED AS A 3 1/8" X 12" GLULAM BEAM, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A 6X12 BEAM. CLARIFY. 27. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 16): BEAM B4 IN THE CALCULATIONS (B6 ON THE FRAMING PLAN AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS) IS LISTED AS A 6X12, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A 3 1/2" X 11 7/8" PARALLAM. CLARIFY. 28. SHEET S103g; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: IT IS CLEAR THERE ARE MANY DISCREPANCIES AND OMISSIONS FOR THE BEAMS BETWEEN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND THE PERMIT DRAWINGS. REVIEW AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. 29. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S601 (DETAIL 301): DETAIL 301 CUT ON THE PLAN ON GRID G6 BETWEEN GRIDS GK AND GL.1 INDICATES JOISTS PERPENDICULAR TO THE WALL, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES JOISTS PARALLEL TO THE WALL. CLARIFY. 30. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S601 (DETAIL 301): DETAIL 301 CUT ON THE PLAN ON GRID GP BETWEEN GRIDS G6 AND G11 INDICATES JOISTS PERPENDICULAR TO THE WALL, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES JOISTS PARALLEL TO THE WALL. CLARIFY. 31. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S601 (DETAIL 301): DETAIL 301 CUT ON THE PLAN ON GRID G11 BETWEEN GRIDS GM AND GN.6 INDICATES JOISTS PERPENDICULAR TO THE WALL, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES JOISTS PARALLEL TO THE WALL. CLARIFY. 32. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S601 (DETAIL 312): DETAIL 312 CUT ON THE PLAN ON GRID G15 AND GRID GN.6 IS INCORRECT. SHOULD THIS BE 318? VERIFY. 33. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S601 (DETAIL 301): DETAIL 301 CUT ON THE PLAN ON GRID G2 BETWEEN GRIDS GJ AND GK INDICATES JOISTS PERPENDICULAR TO THE WALL, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES JOISTS PARALLEL TO THE WALL. CLARIFY. 34. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S601 (DETAIL 301): DETAIL 301 CUT ON THE PLAN ON GRID G1 BETWEEN GRIDS GD.6 AND GF INDICATES JOISTS PERPENDICULAR TO THE WALL, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES JOISTS PARALLEL TO THE WALL. CLARIFY. 35. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S601 (DETAIL 317): DETAIL 317 CUT ON THE PLAN AT THE WEST WALL OF THE NORTH STAIR INDICATES JOISTS PERPENDICULAR TO THE MASONRY WALL, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES JOISTS PARALLEL TO THE WALL. CLARIFY. 36. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S602 (DETAIL 327): DETAIL 327 CUT ON THE PLAN AT THE LANDING OF THE NORTH STAIR INDICATES A JOIST BEARING ON A BLOCK WALL LEDGER, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A JOIST BEARING ON A WOOD BEAM. CLARIFY. 37. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S601 (DETAILS 315, 316, AND 317): ARE THE STAIR WALLS (TWO STAIRS THUS) MASONRY OR WOOD STUD? THESE DETAILS SHOW DIFFERENT MATERIALS. VERIFY AND REVISE. 38. SHEET S103g; FRAMING PLAN: THE C1 COLUMNS AROUND THE ELEVATOR ARE INDICATED AS STEEL COLUMNS IN THE DETAILS, BUT AS WOOD POSTS IN THE SCHEDULE (S006). CLARIFY. 39. SHEET S103g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S602 (DETAIL 337): DETAIL 337 CUT ON THE PLAN AT THE ELEVATOR IS TITLED "WOOD JOISTS AT STEEL BEAM", BUT NO JOISTS ARE INDICATED ON THE DETAIL OR ON THE PLAN. CLARIFY. 40. SHEET S103g: VERIFY THAT THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND JOISTS, BEAMS, AND COLUMNS INDICATED ON THE PLAN MATCH. 41. SHEET S104g; HIGH ROOF FRAMING PLAN: INDICATE ON THE PLAN THE SIZE AND SPACING OF THE ROOF JOISTS. 42. SHEET S104g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S701 (DETAIL 408): DETAIL 408 CUT ON THE PLAN AT EXTERIOR WALLS ON GRIDS GA, GC, GF, GM, AND GU INDICATES A MECHANICAL UNIT PLATFORM, BUT THE LOCATION OF THE DETAIL ON THE PLAN IS NOT CORRECT. VERIFY. 43. SHEET S104g; FRAMING PLAN: INDICATE ALL MECHANICAL UNIT PLATFORMS ON THIS PLAN, AND REFERENCE MECHANICAL SHEET M207g TO VERIFY. 44. SHEET S104g; FRAMING PLAN: HOW CAN IT BE DETERMINED IF THE SUPPORT MEMBERS AT THE EXTERIOR WALLS FOR THE GIRDER TRUSSES ARE DOUBLE WOOD STUDS (DETAIL 403) OR WOOD POSTS (DETAIL 407)? CLARIFY. 45. SHEET S301g; SHEARWALL PLAN: MOVE THE SHEARWALL NOTATION OF THE WEST WALL OF THE NORTH STAIR SO IT IS LEGIBLE. 46. SHEET S301g; SHEARWALL PLAN: ADD A SHEARWALL DESIGNATION TO THE WALL JUST NORTH OF THE EAST STAIR. 47. SHEET S301g; SHEARWALL NOTES: NOTE 6 REFERENCES SHEET S007. REVISE. 48. SHEET S301g; SHEARWALL NOTES: REFERENCE SHEET S006 FOR THE SHEARWALL HOLDOWN SCHEDULE. 49. SHEET S501; DETAIL 201: REMOVE NOTE 8 FROM THE DETAIL? VERIFY. 50. SHEET S501; DETAIL 202: PROVIDE THE QUANTITY AND SPACING OF #3 TIES AT THE TOP OF THE COLUMN. 51. SHEET S501; DETAIL 204: CLARIFY THE BARS REFERENCED IN NOTE 5. 52. SHEET S501; DETAIL 211: 'TREADS' MISSPELLED. REVISE. 53. SHEET S501; DETAIL 214: CLARIFY NOTE 9. 54. SHEET S501; DETAIL 214: IS THERE ANY REINFORCEMENT FROM THE MASONRY WALL INTO THE CONCRETE SLAB? VERIFY. 55. SHEET S501; DETAIL 217: ADD VERBIAGE FOR NOTE 7. 56. SHEET S501; DETAIL 214: INDICATE MASONRY VENEER PER NOTE 5. 57. SHEET S601; DETAIL 303: REVISE NOTE 3. 58. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE A SUMMARY SHEET IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATING BEAM SIZES. REFERENCE THOSE BEAMS TO THE GRID LINES INDICATED ON SHEET S103g OR SIMILAR GRID LINES INDICATED ON A KEY PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS. THERE ARE BEAMS THAT HAVE NO DESIGN CALCULATIONS. 59. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE A SUMMARY SHEET IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATING COLUMN SIZES. REFERENCE THOSE COLUMN TO THE GRID LINES INDICATED ON SHEET S103g OR SIMILAR GRID LINES INDICATED ON A KEY PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS. 60. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE A SUMMARY SHEET IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATING THE SHEARWALLS AS SHOWN ON S301g, S1 THROUGH S7. REFERENCE THOSE SHEARWALLS TO THE SHEARWALL SCHEDULE ON SHEET S006 AND THE SHEARWALL PLAN ON SHEET S301g. 61. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS BY RON BROWN 62. Because of the incomplete nature of the submitted documents a thorough and accurate review could not be conducted. The review comments below are not to be considered as a complete and final review. Additional comments will be forthcoming upon the next completed submittal. 63. Please provide the 2 part special inspection certification form for approval of the selected inspectors. 64. Please send a summary of your intended deferred submittals (plywood web joists and wood trusses) on your letter head stationary to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose. 65. For all floor plans and detail 5/A522g: If there is to be a trash chute on the West side of the elevator bank GE1 as noted on detail 1/A201Bg that penetrates all floor assemblies including the 3 hour horizontal separation floor assembly, please provide the following: a. Effect on the surrounding trash chute fire rated partitions when it penetrates a the 3 hour rated horizontal floor assembly. b. Please show the trash chute access at all floor levels and indicate a fire rated access door as required. c. Please show the trash chute on details 1, 2 and 3/A522g and all associated access hatches and fire rated assemblies. 66. Please provide large scale toilet and kitchen floor plans and elevations for all the different types of toilet rooms and kitchens showing all accessible requirements as per the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC A117.1, 2003 Edition including but not limited to the following: dimensions, clearances, accessories, fixtures, signage, heights and insulation. SHEET FLS00g 67. Please provide a list of all governing building codes. 68. Please provide a complete occupancy load calculation summarizing the loads for each floor level and provide a grand total. 69. "Section 104 Building Official": There is no such code as the 2010 IBC. Please change to the 2009 IBC as approved by the building official. 70. Section 509.2 Special Provisions: Section 509.2 of the 2009 IBC has already been used for incidental uses. The same section from the 2006 IBC is also quoted for parking garage separation for the buildings above. There is no parking garage in this project. Please explain. 71. The entire building is required to be sprinkled. Please delete references that certain areas are not required to be sprinkled. SHEETS FLS01g AND FLS02g 72. Please provide a fire partition legend and partition identification on the floor plans. SHEET A201Ag 73. How is egress achieved to apartment unit G122? 74. Please provide accessible clearance at door G121 as per ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.1. 75. Provide large scale plan and interior elevations for toilet room G124 and a reference marker to these details. 76. Identify the West exterior stair as GS2, complete and show the connection to the interior stair GS2. Identify all required fire rated partitions and their required ratings. SHEET A201Bg 77. Sliding doors G106 and G103 are not approved exit doors. Please revise. SHEET A202Ag 78. Show Stair G2 exit through West wall, landing and stairs down. SHEETS A101g THROUGH A107g 79. Please provide a fire rated partition schedule with partitions scheduled identification (poche') shown on the floor plans. SHEETS A201Ag THROUGH A203Bg 80. Please provide partition type reference markers to details shown on sheets A400a and A400b. SHEET A310g 81. Detail 02 a. The stairs are noncompliant with building and accessibility codes. Please revise all stairs to comply with the 2006 IBC, Sections 1009, 1012, and ICC A117.1, Section 505 and the details shown on sheet A450. b. As per the 2006 IBC, Section 1003.2, the minimum ceiling height is to be 7'-6". The stair GE2 exit landing appears to be 6'-10". Please reconcile. 82. Finish detailing, referencing and dimensioning. SHEETS A310g THROUGH A312g 83. Finish detailing, referencing and dimensioning. SHEET A320g 84. Please identify the 3 hour horizontal floor separation in all of the building sections. SHEETS A400a AND A400b 85. Please provide testing lab assembly number for all the fire rated wall and floor assembly details. 86. Please finish rating of all referenced fire rated assemblies: i.e. example detail T/A400b indicates T2 type but no indication of a 3 hour fire rating. SHEETS A400dg AND A400f 87. Reconcile your door schedule to insure that all the doors are listed. Door G121 is not shown. 88. Finish the door schedule 89. Provide a hardware schedule. 90. Provide panic hardware for all exit doors as required by the 2006 IBC, Section 1008.1.9 SHEETS A520g AND A521g 91. Please finish these sheets: a. a. Dimensioning, stair risers and treads, the stairs are noncompliant with building and accessibility codes. Please revise all stairs to comply with the 2006 IBC, Sections 1009, 1012, and ICC A117.1, Section 505 and the details shown on sheet A450. 92. At detail 6/A521g, identify the 3 hour horizontal fire rated floor assembly and required fire rate wall enclosures around the area of stair shaft penetration. SHEET A522g 93. Identify the 3 hour horizontal fire floor assembly and effect on elevator shaft at penetration of that assembly. SHEETS A530g, A531g AND A532g 94. Finish detailing, referencing and dimensioning. SHEET A533g 95. For Detail 3 reference comment 65 SHEETS A600A AND A700 96. These sheets show copies of accessible code requirements: a. Please identify the governing accessible code as the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC A117.1, 2003 Edition. Please verify and confirm that all these copied details comply with the governing code. 97. These details are to be for reference only and are not a substitute for complete toilet and kitchen detailed floor plans and interior elevations as per comment 66. SHEET A100g 98. There are no plans or details of the courtyard in the architectural and structural drawings of this submittal. Those drawings included in the Development Package in the landscape section are not sufficient for a complete and proper building code review. Please provide a complete design, detailing, accessible compliance and structural details and calculations for this area. a. Drainage of the courtyard should be direct to the outside and not underneath the building. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/10/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Water heaters with inputs of 200,000 BTUH or greater are classified as boilers and require approval from the Arizona Boiler inspector. Reference: Title 20, Chapter 5, Article 4, Arizona Administrative Code. 2. Clarify the plumbing code to be used for this activity. The City of Tucson allows either the 2006 UPC or the 2006 IPC (both with local amendments) to be used but the documents must indicate which code is being used. This review has been made using the 2006 IPC. 3. Provide structural calculations to show that the boilers and the hot water storage vessel are safely supported by the roof. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2006. 4. Show how the penetrations of the fire-rated floor/ceiling assemblies are to be protected. Reference: Section 307.3, IPC 2006. 5. Revise the Plumbing Fixture Schedule (P402g) to provide fixture descriptions for all plumbing fixtures used in the residential areas of the building. All plumbing fixtures and fittings shall be listed or labeled by a nationally-recognized, accredited conformity assessment company (e.g. UL, ETL, UPC, etc). Reference: Section 402, IPC 2006. 6. Clarify the reason for omitting the overflow drains on the tubs shown in waste and vent diagram 13 on sheet P604g. Reference: Section 407.1, IPC 2006. 7. Provide installation details for the booster pump for the water distribution system. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 303.2, IPC 2006. 8. Provide a vacuum relief for the hot water storage-vessel. Reference: Section 504.2, IPC 2006. 9. Provide temperature and relief valves for the hot water storage-vessel and the hot water boilers. Reference: Section 504.4, IPC 2006. 10. Provide water supply diagrams for the 1st floor. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 11. Revise the water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations (P401g) to correspond to the current building - unless you expect the extra 12 stories to be constructed at a later date. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 604.1, IPC 2006. 12. Show that the branch piping sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Reference: Section 604.4 and Table 604.3, IPC 2006. 13. Water distribution from the booster pumps to the "last PRV" is specified to be done with Type L copper tubing. Verify that the tubing sizes shown on sheet P401R will not exceed the calculated pressure loss of 8.0 PSI per 100 feet and will not exceed a velocity of 8 FPS. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 14. Water distribution in the dwelling units is specified to be done with PEX tubing. Verify that the tubing sizes shown on sheet P401R (from the "PRV valve [to the] last fixture") will not exceed the calculated pressure loss of 8.30 PSI per 100 feet (or whatever pressure drop per 100 feet the new calculations show) and will not exceed a velocity of 8 FPS. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 15. Provide cleanouts for all horizontal drains. Reference: Section 708.3.1, IPC 2006. 16. Provide a cleanout at the base of each waste stack. Reference: Section 708.3.4, IPC 2006. 17. Provide a cleanout at the base of each roof drain stack prior to connection to the horizontal storm drain. Reference: Section 708.3.4, IPC 2006. 18. Provide cleanouts for all horizontal rainwater drains; the cleanouts shall not be located greater than 100-feet apart, measured from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. Reference: Section 708.3.1, IPC 2006. 19. Remove the backwater valve shown on sheet P201Ag; all of the plumbing fixtures are over 12" above the rim of the next upstream manhole. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 05/10/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Show that the Big Ass ceiling fan is being installed in accordance with the conditions of its listing and the manufacturer's installation requirements. Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2006. 3. Show how adequate access is being provided for the fan coil units located above the non-access ceilings. Reference: Section 306.3, IMC 2006. 4. Revise the size of the condensate drains serving multiple units per Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson. 5. Provide auxiliary drain pans or secondary drain systems for fan coil units. Reference: Section 307.2.3 IMC 2006. 6. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006. 7. Show that the equivalent length of the dryer exhaust ducts does not exceed the maximum length per Section 504.6.1, IMC 2006. 8. Show the hoistway venting required per Section 3004.1, IBC 2006. 9. Show the location of the elevator machine room and how the elevator machine room is conditioned to prevent overheating of the elevator equipment. Reference: Section 3006, IBC 2006. |
| 05/10/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Clarify the size of the water meters to be used for this building. The calculations on sheet P401g call for three 2" water meters to serve a demand of 300 GPM and sheet P201Ag calls out a 4" water meter for the same demand. In addition, sheet P201Ag also shows another 2" water meter to serve a different 100 GPM demand (149 GPM on sheet P401g). Tucson Water limits a 2" meter to a maximum demand of 80 GPM and does not allow the use of manifolded water meters. Verify the sizes of the water meters to be used with Tucson Water and coordinate the drawings and calculations. |
| 05/21/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. PLAZA CENTRO STUDENT HOUSING - GREYHOUND DP12-0030 - DOES NOT INCLUDE 1ST FLOOR SHELLED SPACE -2797 FU'S @SFR RATE= $740,114.17 AND 114FU'S @COMMERCIAL RATE = $800,461.17 2. NEED PCRWRD REVIEW OF LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - CHAD AMATEAU 740-6547 - NEED MANHOLE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPROVAL 740-6369 3. NEED PCRWRD CAPACITY REVIEW - KURT STEMM 740-6607 4. NEED WASTEWATER CREDIT EVALUATION 740-6602 OR 740-6606 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/03/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/03/2012 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |