Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM03209
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/02/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Second request: revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch high (see sheet P1.1). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 2. Comment not resolved; a 2" cleanout is not approved for use with a 3" drain pipe. [Original comment: Show the size of the under-floor portion of the vents for the floor sinks located in the equipment room and in the sales floor area. The size of that portion of the vent shall comply with the cleanout size requirements of Table 7-6, UPC 2006. Reference: Section 707.11, UPC 2006.] 3. Comment not resolved; the waste and vent schematic shows a mop sink and a floor drain without flow control devices. [Original comment: Each fixture that is connected to a hydromechanical grease interceptor requires a flow control device unless the grease interceptor is equipped with an integral flow control device. Reference: Section 1014.2.1, UPC 2006.] 4. Coordinate the location of the entry point for the water service to the building: civil sheet 4 of 12 (Utility plan) and P1.1 show different entry locations. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 12/07/2011 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Need Approved Site Plan. 2. Need County Health Department activity number. SHEET NUMBERS A9.4 AND S4.1 3. Detail numbers 1/A9.4 and 108/S4.1 are the same detail but are contradictory to each other. Please reconcile. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/09/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | The Development Plan is still under review through the CDRC Review Process. As of this review date 12/9/11, the development plan has not been approved. Zoning will re-review the building plans on the next submittal and compare the building plans to the approved development plan. Zoning will review the building plans to ensure compliance with the approved development plan if the DP has been approved and stamped by the CDRC manager. If available include a copy of the approved DP on the building submittal. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 12/15/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED CIVAL DRAWINGS (SITE & UTILITY PLANS) SHOWING LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - NEED PCRWRD 1ST FLOOR / CHAD AMATEAU REVIEW OF LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION - 740-6547 NEED WW/IWC REVIEW & APPROVAL OF GREASE TRAP - TOM TOMCHAK - 5025 W INA RD - 443-6200 NEED 5TH FLOOR WW CREDIT EVALUATION FOR DEMO OF EXSISTING BLDG. 740-6602 OR 740-6606 |
| 12/29/2011 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | REJECT SHELF | Completed |
| 01/03/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |