Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM02899
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/09/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | An Appeal to the Building Official is separate and distinct from resubmitting the documents for a plan review. As an alternative method of construction that is not explicitly covered in the plumbing code, the applicant must provide sufficient calculations and supporting data to show that the proposed method of construction is equivalent or superior to the code-prescribed construction in effectiveness, durability, and safety. You have provided documentation that establishes the technical basis for Siphonic roof drainage (ASME A112.6.9-2005 and the ASPE standard, Siphonic Roof Drainage) along with data from the manufacturer of the Siphonic roof drains and the design software. The drawings include the piping layouts, isometrics, and pipe support details for the four siphonic drain systems. The drawings do not show how high the overflow roof drains are to be mounted in relation to the siphonic roof drains to allow the siphonic drain system to prime (the overflow drains associated with the siphonic roof drains do not include a 2" dam). The structural calculations do not appear to address the additional rain load on the roof and, with no crickets on the roof, the extent of the rain load will be more widespread than with normal roof drainage systems. Resubmit the siphonic roof data using an Appeal to the Building Official form (see: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/dsd/Appeal%20form3.pdf). [Second comment: Comment not resolved; the submitted data sheets alone do not have sufficient information to properly evaluate the equivalency of the proposed Siphonic roof drainage system to the roof drainage requirement of the Uniform Plumbing Code or to the structural design of the roof. See Section 301.2, UPC 2006 for guidance for the information required in an Appeal to the Building Official.] [Original comment: Siphonic roof drainage is an engineered system that requires the submission of an Appeal to the Building Official under Section 301.2, UPC 2006, Alternate Materials and Methods of Construction Equivalency. Submit the calculations, upon which the design is based, for review by the Building Official. Include in the calculations the structural requirements for the effect of the roof ponding.] |
| 11/17/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED COPY OF ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER FOR WAL-MART FOR BASE MAP UPDATE |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/16/2011 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/16/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |