Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM02899
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/20/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/21/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/24/2011 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Reference the comment response 1c, the 8' high wrought iron fencing to be submitted by selective manufacturer at a later date, please submit a defferred submittal for this item to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose, for additional plan review fee assessment. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/26/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/26/2011 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Bldg plans shall not be issued prior to Grading Permit T11BU01211 issuance. |
| 10/26/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved; provide the expected flow rate from the evaporative condensers into the floor sink. [Original comment: Provide the basis for sizing the drainage system for the evaporative condensers and show that the size of the indirect waste receptor (SS1) is adequate to accommodate the expected flow without splashing, flooding, or overloading the drain from the indirect waste receptor. Reference: Sections 702.0 and 703.0, UPC 2006.] 2. If the manhole rim is adjusted to an elevation of 2475.15', no backwater valve will be required. However, the revised civil utility drawing you sent shows a rim elevation of 2477.50' which would obviously result in a backwater valve being required. Coordinate the drawings and note the intended change to the rim elevation. [Original comment: The rim elevation (2475.90') of the next upstream sanitary manhole for the building sewer exiting on the east wall of the building is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2476.50'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 3. Comment not resolved, the submitted data sheets alone do not have sufficient information to properly evaluate the equivalency of the proposed Siphonic roof drainage system to the roof drainage requirement of the Uniform Plumbing Code or to the structural design of the roof. See Section 301.2, UPC 2006 for guidance for the information required in an Appeal to the Building Official. [Original comment: Siphonic roof drainage is an engineered system that requires the submission of an Appeal to the Building Official under Section 301.2, UPC 2006, Alternate Materials and Methods of Construction Equivalency. Submit the calculations, upon which the design is based, for review by the Building Official. Include in the calculations the structural requirements for the effect of the roof ponding.] |
| 10/27/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED PCRWRD CAPACITY REVIEW-KURTSTEMM-740-6607 NEED PCRWRD REVIEW OF LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER- CHAD AMATEAU - 740-6547 NEED IWC REVIEW & APPROVAL OF GREASE & OIL INTERCEPTORS- TOM TOMCHAK- 443-6200- 5025 W INA RD NEED COPY OF ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER FOR WAL-MART FOR BASE MAP UPDATE |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/08/2011 | SUE REEVES | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/08/2011 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |