Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T11CM02529
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/24/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: Sheet A100 1. Provide seal on this sheet. Building Data and Egress are profession practice. 2. Show locations of fire hydrants. See IFC Sections 508 and Appendix B for fire flow for new area. 3. Show fire lanes. Show locations of gates, etc. Arials show the site as congested. Fire lanes may need signs. See IFC Section 503 as amended. 4. Provide quantities of hazardous materials. Will they increase with this addition? See IFC Chapter 27. |
| 08/24/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/25/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/12/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/16/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. GENERAL: PER THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIREMENTS, 2 COMPLETE SETS OF THE DRAWINGS MUST BE PROVIDED FOR REVIEW. 2. GENERAL: ALL SHEETS APPLICABLE TO THIS SUBMITTAL MUST BE STAMPED, SIGNED, AND DATED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL. 3. GENERAL: PROVIDE A TITLE SHEET T1 ON BOTH SETS. 4. SHEET A100: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 5. SHEET A100; APPLICABLE CODES: ALTHOUGH THIS IS NOT AN ISSUE FOR THE 'FOUNDATION ONLY' PERMIT, THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE IS THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 EDITION. 6. SHEET S200; FOUNDATION PLAN: DARKEN THE DRAWINGS AND VERBIAGE FOR THE EXISTING BUILDING SO IT WILL BE LEGIBLE WHEN SCANNED. DARKEN THE PLAN TITLE AND ELEVATIONS. 7. SHEET S200 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: DID NOT LOCATE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENDWALL COLUMNS (C4) OR THE BASE PLATES AND ANCHORS. VERIFY. 8. SHEET S200; FOUNDATION PLAN: TWO COLUMNS ON THE EAST END OF THE BUILDING HAVE A DETAIL CUT 103 SIM. SINCE THERE IS ONLY A SINGLE HELICAL PIER AT THESE LOCATIONS, SHOULD THEY BE SIM TO DETAIL 104? VERIFY. 9. SHEET S200; FOUNDATION PLAN: THE EAST ENDWALL COLUMN IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING INDICATES NO HAIRPIN BARS AT THE COLUMN. VERIFY. 10. SHEET S200; FOUNDATION PLAN: PROVIDE DETAILS WHERE THE NEW BUILDING SLAB ABUTS THE EXISTING BUILDING (3 SIDES). NOTES 2 AND 3 DO NOT FULLY CLARIFY THOSE CONDITIONS. 11. SHEET S300; DETAILS 102 AND 106: PER THE CITY OF TUCSON AMENDMENTS TO THE 2006 IBC, SECTION 1805.2 INDICATES A MINIMUM DEPTH OF FOOTING OF 12" BELOW GROUND SURFACE. REVISE. 12. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/16/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a copy of the approved site plan with next submittal. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/19/2011 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |