Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM02309
Parcel: 10824011A

Address:
2450 E RIVER RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T11CM02309
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/22/2011 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Center for Neuroscience - Expansion
T11CM02309
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 22, 2011


1. The building, plan have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plans until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning can not approve the plans until the development plan has been revised and approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the plans on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\building\t11cm02309.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
07/25/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
07/30/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
08/01/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Please provide special inspection certifications prior to issuance of permit.
2. Please provide a letter to the building official listing all the deferred submittals for the purpose of assessing additional review fees.
3. Please provide previously approved site development plan prior to issuance of a building permit.
4. Please provide a plan of the entire showing all areas of work both TI and additions. Please make a clear distinction of the exiting facilitiies and the new addition.
5. Please provide structural calculations and details for all roof top mounted HVAC equipment.
6. Please provide a valuation number for the TI work separate from the new additon work.
7. Please show the claculations for the area building area increase due to sprinkler systems and frontage.
8. Please provide an occupancy load calculation for the entire building. A new Certificate of Occupancy will be issued based upon the total building occupancy load.
9. At the Code Review shown on Sheet TS1.0, delete al;l reference to ADA and ADAAG. This project is governed by the 2006 IBC and it clearly identifies all accessible compliance to be as per Chapter 11 and ICC /ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition.
SHEET D1.0
10. Please show the entire building and identify all areas of demolition for new TI and addition work.
11. Demolition reference 8 at the patio to be demolished should be 10?
SHEET A1.1
12. Please indicate that the gate south of required exit door 116 is fitted with exit hardware.
13. Please provide a reference for Toilet Room 106 to a large scale toilet floor plan.
14. please provide an accessible counter section inthe receptionest counter as required by ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 904, Service Counters.
15. Where is the janitor's closet and mop sink?
SHEET DTL-1
16. Please provide a large scle toilet and toilet elevations for toilet room 106. Insure that all ICC/ANSI 117.1 accessibility requirements are shown on the plan and elevations; dimensions, accessories, clearances, and signage.

STRUCTURAL REVIEW BY ERIC NEWCOMB

17. SHEET S1.0; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOIL REPORT WAS USED FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW.
18. SHEET S1.5; FOOTING SCHEDULE: SHOULD THE NOTATION "E.W." BE ADDED TO THE REINFORCING ON F2? VERIFY.
19. SHEET S1.5; SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE: THE "NOTES" NEED TO BE CLARIFIED. WHAT DOES THE FIRST NOTE ("* SHEATHING ON ONE SIDE. DOUBLE WALL IF SHEATHING ON BOTH SIDE.") MEAN? THE SCHEDULE INDICATES WHICH WALLS ARE TO HAVE ONE OR TWO LAYERS OF SHEATHING. WHAT DOES THE SECOND NOTE ("FOR SHEAR WALLS WITH SHEATHING APPLIES TO BOTH SIDES, ANCHOR BOLTS/PINS SPACING SHALL BE HALF THE SPACING SHOWN.") MEAN? JUST CHANGE THE SPACING INDICATED IN THE SCHEDULE FOR SW1.
20. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 39): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE C2 TO BE A 8X4X5/16 TUBE, WHILE THE DRAWINGS INDICATE A 10X3X1/4. VERIFY THE 10X3X1/4 IS ADEQUATE.
21. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S3.0 (DETAIL 108): THE FOUNDATION PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE A 12" FOUNDATION WALL AS INDICATED ON DETAIL 108 (NORTH AND SOUTH WALLS). CLARIFY.
22. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S3.1 (DETAIL 118): VERIFY THAT DETAIL CUT 118 AT THE NORTHEAST PORTION OF THE BUILDING IS CORRECT. ADJACENT DETAILS 119 AND 120 INDICATE A MASONRY RETAINING WALL, WHILE 118 INDICATES A METAL STUD WALL.
23. SHEET S2.1 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 3): JOISTS J4 AND J5 IN THE CALCULATIONS DO NOT SHOW UP ON THE CALCULATION KEY PLAN OR ON THE FRAMING PLAN. VERIFY.
24. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 103: IS THE NOTE 1 REFERENCE TO A WOOD STUD WALL CORRECT? VERIFY.
25. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 108: VERIFY THE SIZE OF THE METAL STUD ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THIS DETAIL.
26. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 105: IS THE DETAIL TITLE CORRECT? IS THIS AN EXTERIOR STEEL COLUMN (DETAIL 106 INDICATES INTERIOR)? VERIFY.
27. SHEET S3.0 (DETAIL 108); SHEET S4.0 (DETAIL 211): THESE DETAILS ARE CUT IN THE SAME WALL (NORTHEAST PORTION OF THE BUILDING). VERIFY THE DOUBLE STUD INDICATED ON DETAIL 108, BUT NOT ON 211.
28. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 109: REMOVE NOTE 8. VERIFY.
29. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 113: ADD A NOTE TO GROUT THE MASONRY CORES SOLID BELOW GRADE.
30. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 114: ADD A NOTE TO GROUT THE MASONRY CORES SOLID BELOW GRADE.
31. SHEET S3.1; DETAIL 118: REVISE THE REFERENCE NOTE TO THE MASONRY SHIELDING FROM 7 TO 5. VERIFY.
END OF REVIEW
08/01/2011 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed
08/02/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
08/02/2011 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The development plan must be approved before the building plans are approved.
08/03/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide mechanical floor and roof plans with a legible background (the submitted drawings are too light to be successfully scanned). Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
2. Modify the key plan on sheet M1.1 to indicate the location of the new work involving FC-1. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
3. Clarify the installation of AC-4 on sheet M1.1. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
4. Clarify the installation of EF-10. The balancing information for EF-10 on sheet M1.1 shows only 800 CFM being exhausted but the fan is scheduled to move 1200 CFM on sheet M9.1. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
5. Some of the proposed new rooftop mechanical units (AC-4 and CH-1) are not shown on the roof framing plan, S2.1. Verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the roof top units. In addition, coordinate the weights of the proposed heat pumps (HP-1 and HP-2, at 800 pounds each) are adequately supported - they are shown at 750 pounds each on sheet S2.1. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
08/03/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide plumbing plans with a legible background (the submitted drawings are too light to be successfully scanned). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Provide material standards for all plumbing fixtures being provided by others (e.g. the hand sink in the procedure vault). All plumbing fixtures and fittings shall be listed or labeled by a nationally-recognized, accredited conformity assessment company (e.g. UL, ETL, NSF, UPC, etc). Include all of the fixtures in the fixture schedule. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 301.1.1, and 401.1, UPC 2006.
3. The Dri-Steem Drane-kooler requires a minimum water pressure of 25 PSI to function correctly; is this residual pressure available for it? Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006.
4. Provide an accessible cleanout in the vertical portion of the foot vent for the island sink. Reference: Section 909.0, UPC 2006.
5. Revise the roof drainage calculations to include the effect of the surrounding parapets per Section 1106.0, UPC 2006.
6. Provide sizing calculations for the roof scuppers. Reference: Section 1101.11, UPC 2006.
7. Clarify the operating characteristics of the Quick Connect Panel (QCP) with regard to domestic water use. Reference: Section 1201.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/04/2011 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/04/2011 CINDY AGUILAR REJECT SHELF Completed