Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T11CM01742
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2011 | CARL SCHULTZ | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire hydrants are required within 300 feet from building IFC city modifications 508.1, 508.3, 508.5.1, 508.5.2. |
| 06/07/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Family Dollar - Broadway & Plumer T11CM01742 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 9, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the areas of expansion and any changes to the site. 2. As the site, landscape & building plans have been submitted together combine the plans together and revise the drawing index to reflect all sheets as one set prior to the next submittal. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 There appears to some type of lot split or lot line reconfig proposed. Clarify what is happening and provide documentation that it has been approved by the COT. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 The proposed Long-Term bicycle parking does not appear to provide the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.4.B.2. Demonstrate how the proposed location meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.4.B 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 As it appears that new curbing and landscape areas are proposed provide parking area access lane (PAAL) width dimensions for all PAALs. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The phase lines to not appear to be correct. On the north end of "FUTURE RETAIL PAD" the phase line does not cross the sidewalk. On the south end of "FUTURE RETAIL PAD" the phase line does cross the sidewalk. Is this sidewalk in Phase 1 or 2? 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 There is a monument sign shown under Keynote 23 that is located within the future sight-visibility-triangle (SVT). Provide documentation that a Development Standards Modification Request (DSMR) was approved for this sign. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Revise General Note 26 to include "Gateway Corridor Zone; Sec. 2.8.5" 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Per the COT MS&R maps the future right-of-way (ROW) for Broadway Blvd is 150' not 120 as shown on the plan. Revise the future ROW to shown the correct 150'. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan along with the recordation information, docket and page/sequence number. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show any existing or proposed site lighting on the plan. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 The zoning shown for the parcel on the northeast side of Plumer Avenue is not correct. The zoning should be shown as C-2. Be aware that the I-1 and C-2 zoning line jogs along the center line of Plumer. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A. As Phasing is proposed provide all applicable calculations for Phase 1 and Phase 2. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Based on the vehicle parking calculation all 93 spaces are to be provided. Based on the Phase lines only 87 will be provided in Phase 1. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 Zoning acknowledges that there are no loading spaces required for this project but loading spaces have been provided. Revise the loading space calculation to show the number of loading spaces provided. 16. Remove the references to T04BU01881 & T04OT00774 from the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\2011\t11cm01742 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan. |
| 06/09/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At the marked crossing located in front of the Family Dollar, provide detectable warning strips at both ends of the marked crossing just prior to entering the PAAL. 2. At the marked crossing connectinng the Auto Zone Store to the future retail pad, provide detectable warning strips at both ends of the marked crossing just prior to entering the PAAL. 3. Insure slope compliance of all new accessible routes with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3. 4. At all accessible parking spaces including aisles, a maximum of 2% slope must be maintained in all directions. 5. A pedestrian walkway with a slope of more than 5% is considered a ramp. Please delete the ramp reference on sheet 2 at the north west corner sidewalk of the future building pad. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/15/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 15, 2011 SUBJECT: 2160 E Broadway- Site Plan Engineering Review TO: Metro Permit Inc., Attn: Lisa Bower LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec17 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T11CM01742 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Site Plan (T11CM01742) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) The new site plan number may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan sheets where indicated by "T11CM__." Remove the references to the other activity numbers, T04BU01881 and T04OT00774. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Clarify the lot lines as shown on the site plan. Per the Assessor's records it appears that the site plan is proposing a lot reconfiguration, verify. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan and details to correctly label the 2.5 foot over hang for the wheel stop barrier. The parking spaces are to be set at 15.5-feet to accommodate the required 2.5-foot overhang to prevent encroachment or damage to the proposed landscape area and the required clear 4-foot pedestrian path. Revise the parking stall details on Sheet 3 to correctly show the required 2.5-foot overhang not the 3-foot as shown. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the future SVT dimensions based on the correct future right-of-way of 150 feet. Verify that none of the required improvements fall within the future SVT such as monument signs, parking spaces, etc. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan to clearly label and dimension the required 24-foot PAAL widths adjacent to all new landscape islands within the vehicular use area. Verify all 2-way PAALs meet the minimum 24 feet. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for any handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that may apply to this project. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan and the proposed phase lines for the project. Verify that all proposed improvements that are to be constructed under phase 1 are shown within the phase line, i.e. the pedestrian access path in front of the future building pad that connects the Family Dollar store to the existing AutoZone store. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Verify the percent slope for the proposed ramp at the pedestrian access point adjacent to the north side of the future building. Verify sidewalk widths at all locations; the sidewalk adjacent to the proposed addition, refuse container location and the area in front of the future building location. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise Keynote #9 on Sheet 2 to state "Existing" for the 5-foot wide curb opening. All existing improvements should be labeled as such in the Keynotes. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.17: Clarify General Notes # 20 and 21 with respect to a grading permit and the proposed grading limits. The 2 notes conflict with each other; if the disturbed area is 1.89 acres then a grading permit will be required along with a SWPPP. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.18: Revise Permitting Note #26 on the site plan to reference all overlay zones associated with this project. Specifically "LUC Sec.2.8.4 Gateway Corridor Zone." 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the Site Plan to correctly label and dimension the future MS&R Right-of-Way for Broadway Blvd. Per the Major Streets and Routes Map the future right-of-way for the section of Broadway is 150-feet not the labeled 120-feet. Revise to correctly show the right-of-way line, future curb and sidewalk dimensions and verify that no required improvements are constructed within the future right-of-way and sight visibility triangle. Verify with TDOT where the right-of-way width is to be measured from, i.e. center line of the road. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that all existing and proposed easements are labeled with recordation information on the site plan, if applicable. 14) Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to any construction within the public right-of-way. BUILDING PLAN: 15) Engineering will re-review the building plan with the next site plan submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. A building plan can not be issued prior to all site plan comments being addressed. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
| 06/16/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/20/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit previously approved landscape and site plans for reference. 2. Any plant material indicated on approved documents and in areas of required landscaping that does not survive will be replaced with an equivalent size and species. DS 2-06.6.1.A 3. Provide the Location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place DS 2-07.2.2.1.A.e 4. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed and revisions are reflected on the landscape plan. 5. Additional comments may apply. |
| 06/20/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/20/2011 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |