Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T11CM01742
Parcel: 12904158E

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T11CM01742
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/06/2011 CARL SCHULTZ FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire hydrants are required within 300 feet from building IFC city modifications 508.1, 508.3, 508.5.1, 508.5.2.
06/09/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The Special Inspection Certification submitted has been signed and sealed by David Garcia approving that all testing has been completed and passed. Please resubmit the Certification without the seal and signature on the second half of the form.
2. For the purpose of assessing additional plan review fees, please submit a letter summary of all deferred submittal items to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose.
3. Insure that Truss manufacturer includes roof loads for all roof top mounted HVAC units.
4. Please provide structural calculations and details for the wall mounted water heater.
5. Provide copy of approved site development plan.
6. Please show the correct square footage of the addition.
SHEET A1.2
7. Toilets are not accessible. Reference Detail 2/A1.3 comments.
SHEET A1.3
8. Code copied details are not acceptable for actual design reference due to the fact the accessible requirements are generally always not included properly in the actual designed floor plan and elevations.
a. For example: The ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition, Section 604.3 calls for a water closet clearance of 5' wide by 4'-8" within which no other fixture may encroach. In your large scale toilet plan, the lavatory is well into the required 5' width clearance of the water closet. Please redesign both toilet rooms and resubmit.
b. Please provide all code required accessible dimensions, accessories, clearances and fixtures on the actual floor plan and elevation designs.
c. Please dimension the center line of the lavatory from the closest adjacent wall.
9. Please show the locations of the accessible signage on the toilet floor plan.
10. Please remove all references to ADA and replace with 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition.
END OF REVIEW
06/09/2011 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Family Dollar - Broadway & Plumer
T11CM01742
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 9, 2011

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the Site plan has been approved.

3. As the site, landscape & building plans have been submitted together combine the plans together and revise the drawing index to reflect all sheets as one set prior to the next submittal.

4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved Site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\bldg\t11cm01742.doc
06/15/2011 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: June 15, 2011
SUBJECT: 2160 E Broadway- Site Plan Engineering Review
TO: Metro Permit Inc., Attn: Lisa Bower
LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec17 Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T11CM01742 (Site Plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Site Plan (T11CM01742) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1) The new site plan number may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan sheets where indicated by "T11CM__." Remove the references to the other activity numbers, T04BU01881 and T04OT00774.

2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Clarify the lot lines as shown on the site plan. Per the Assessor's records it appears that the site plan is proposing a lot reconfiguration, verify.

3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan and details to correctly label the 2.5 foot over hang for the wheel stop barrier. The parking spaces are to be set at 15.5-feet to accommodate the required 2.5-foot overhang to prevent encroachment or damage to the proposed landscape area and the required clear 4-foot pedestrian path. Revise the parking stall details on Sheet 3 to correctly show the required 2.5-foot overhang not the 3-foot as shown.

4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the future SVT dimensions based on the correct future right-of-way of 150 feet. Verify that none of the required improvements fall within the future SVT such as monument signs, parking spaces, etc.

5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan to clearly label and dimension the required 24-foot PAAL widths adjacent to all new landscape islands within the vehicular use area. Verify all 2-way PAALs meet the minimum 24 feet.

6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for any handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that may apply to this project.

7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan and the proposed phase lines for the project. Verify that all proposed improvements that are to be constructed under phase 1 are shown within the phase line, i.e. the pedestrian access path in front of the future building pad that connects the Family Dollar store to the existing AutoZone store.

8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Verify the percent slope for the proposed ramp at the pedestrian access point adjacent to the north side of the future building. Verify sidewalk widths at all locations; the sidewalk adjacent to the proposed addition, refuse container location and the area in front of the future building location.

9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise Keynote #9 on Sheet 2 to state "Existing" for the 5-foot wide curb opening. All existing improvements should be labeled as such in the Keynotes.

10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.17: Clarify General Notes # 20 and 21 with respect to a grading permit and the proposed grading limits. The 2 notes conflict with each other; if the disturbed area is 1.89 acres then a grading permit will be required along with a SWPPP.

11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.18: Revise Permitting Note #26 on the site plan to reference all overlay zones associated with this project. Specifically "LUC Sec.2.8.4 Gateway Corridor Zone."

12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the Site Plan to correctly label and dimension the future MS&R Right-of-Way for Broadway Blvd. Per the Major Streets and Routes Map the future right-of-way for the section of Broadway is 150-feet not the labeled 120-feet. Revise to correctly show the right-of-way line, future curb and sidewalk dimensions and verify that no required improvements are constructed within the future right-of-way and sight visibility triangle. Verify with TDOT where the right-of-way width is to be measured from, i.e. center line of the road.

13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that all existing and proposed easements are labeled with recordation information on the site plan, if applicable.

14) Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to any construction within the public right-of-way.


BUILDING PLAN:

15) Engineering will re-review the building plan with the next site plan submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. A building plan can not be issued prior to all site plan comments being addressed.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the plan review.

For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Planning & Development Services
06/15/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T11CM01742
2160 E Broadway Bl
Family Dollar Store

1. Re-check total va on panel schedule A for lighting circuits 1 through 9, the actual numbers used do not appear to include the continiuos duty amount and appear lower than actual.
2. Locate circuits B 5 and 12, could not find on plan.
3. The total va figures for panels do not add up, and do not corespond to the total load calculations on sheet E-3.0.

Ray Majuta,
Elect Pln Ck,
PDSD, Tucson,
6/15/2011
Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov.
06/16/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
06/16/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide information (e.g. architectural details) to show how the proposed water heater is to be supported from the building structure. Reference: Section 314.5, UPC 2006.
2. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Reference: Section 1101, IPC 2006.
06/16/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Provide the size of the water meter and the backflow preventer for the building. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
06/20/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1. FAMILY DOLLAR - ADDITON/REMODEL
2. NEED CLEARLY IDENTIFY ALL PLUMBING FIXTURES IN EXISTING ELECTRICAL RM - DRAWINGS SHOW EXISTING PLUMBING LINE IN ELECT RM - RECOUNTED ALL WASTEWATER PLUMBING FIXTURES - NEED 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUTION
3. NEED TO REVIEW SITE PLAN NORTH ARROWS
4. NEED TO SHOW LOCATION/METHOD OF EXISTING CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - LOT RECONFIGURATION