Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM01603
Parcel: 305030180

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T11CM01603
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/26/2011 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
06/03/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
06/06/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
06/06/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. A separate permit is required for the installation of private manholes and a private sewer collection system.
2. Clarify the locations for WH-8 and WH-9; there are conflicting designations on sheets 2p1.1 and 2p2.1. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
3. Provide a design for the flues to serve WH-8 and WH-9 (not shown on mechanical drawings). Reference: Section 501.2, IFGC 2006.
4. Provide the missing waste pipe sizes for detail 3/2p2.1. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
06/06/2011 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SHEET g0.2 and g0.3
1. Typical code accessible details are not acceptable as design references. Please show all this information on the actual design floor plans and elevations.
2. The elevator shaft shall have a 1 hour rated enclosure as per section 707.4. The equipment room is to be 1 hour rated as per 2006 IBC, Section 3006.4. Please indicate such on the plans and provide the proper wall sections with approved UL fire rated assembly labels.
SHEET 1a1.1
3. Show wall between Fitness Rooms 1025 and Girls Toilet Room as a 2 hour fire separation wall.
Sheet 1a1.2
4. Ditto Comment 2 above.
SHEET 1a1.3
5. Ditto Comment 3 above
SHEET 1a1.7
6. Please provide intermediate handrails as per 2006 IBC, Section 1012.7 at the monumental stars.
SHEET 1a3.1
7. Please provide and reference a scupper detail for the parapet roof drains.
8. Please provide a metal splash plan at all downspouts dumping on the lower roof section.
SHEETS 1a1.1, 1a1.2 and 1a1.3
9. There is a 2 hour wall type reference to detail 16/a9.5 which is an aluminum curtain wall jamb and column detail. Please reconcile.
SHEET 1a7.1
10. For all accessible toilet room plans and details, please show all accessible dimensions, accessories, clearances and fixtures as required by the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition.
11. For toilet rooms 1018, 1011 and 1059, the door may not swing into the clear space unless a 48"x30" space fit into the room as defined by ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 603.2.3.
SHEET 1a7.2
12. Ditto Comment 10 above.
13. Insure that the two water fountains have mounting heights as per the 2006 IBC, Section 1109.5.1 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 602.4.
SHEET 1a7.3
14. Ditto Comment 10 above.
15. Ditto Comment 11 above for toilet rooms 1090, 2008, and 2021.
SHEET 1a7.5
16. Detail 11: Please show intermediate handrails at the stairs as required by the 2006 IBC, Section 1012.7.
SHEET 1a8.2
17. Insure compliance for panic hardware as required by the 2006 IBC, Section 1008.1.9.
Sheet 2A1.1
18. NOT USED
19. Ditto Comment 13 above
SHEET 2a7.1
20. Details 11 and 12: Elevations not drawn correctly. Please reconcile.
21. Ditto Comment 11 above for toilet room 109
22. Ditto Comment 10 above
SHEET 2a8.1
23. Ditto Comment 17 above
GENERAL COMMENTS
24. For each type of Exhaust hood, please provide a complete wall section showing all material, finishes and structural mounting details and structural calculations.
25. For the purpose of assessing permit review fees, please sent a Deferred Submittal summary letter to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose.
26. Please initiate a Pima County Health Department review and provide us the activity number.
27. Please provide all structural calculations for all roof top mounted HVAC equipment.
28. NOT USED

T11CMO1602 ANDRADA POLYTECHNIC HIGH SCHOOL
T11CMO1603 PANTANO HIGH SCHOOL
STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS

29. SHEET S1.2; CMU WALL SCHEDULES: THERE ARE TWO CMU WALL SCHEDULES ON THIS SHEET. CLARIFY.
30. SHEET S1.4; DETAIL 24: THE DETAIL TITLE INDICATES STEEL LINTELS. REVISE.
31. SHEET S1.5; DETAIL 29: THE TABLE INDICATES THE "MAXIMUM CAPACITY WITH 3X LEDGER". INDICATE LEDGER AND LEDGER CONNECTION TO THE WALL ON SECTION X.
32. SHEET S1.5; DETAIL 32: ADDRESS THE CONDITION OF HOW TO REINFORCE THE 2X12 (FULL DEPTH OF TRUSS) AT THE 3X3 STEEL BRACE ANGLE PENETRATION.
33. SHEET S1.5; DETAIL 32: ARE THERE ANY PREFABRICATED WOOD CHORD/STEEL WEB JOISTS ON THIS PROJECT? PLANS INDICATE ONLY WOOD "I" JOISTS. REVISE THIS DETAIL AS REQUIRED TO INDICATE SOLID WOOD WEBS, AND HOW THE BRACE AT THE PERPENDICULAR CONDITION PENETRATES THE JOIST WEB.
34. SHEET S1.6; DETAIL 52: REVISE THE DIMENSION (1 255/256") FROM THE EDGE OF THE OPENING TO THE BACK OF THE ANGLE.
35. SHEETS 1S2.0/1S2.1/1S2.2/1S2.3/1S3.0/1S3.1/1S3.2/1S3.3/1S3.4/1S3.5; FOUNDATION PLAN: THE ELEVATIONS INDICATE SHEET 1S7.0. REVISE.
36. SHEET 1S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: COMPLETE THE ELEVATION REFERENCE NEAR GRIDS 8 AND C.6.
37. SHEET 1S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: MANY OF THE MASONRY WALLS DO NOT HAVE A REFERENCE TO THE WALL SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.2. PROVIDE.
38. SHEETS 1S2.1/1S2.2/1S2.3; GENERAL PLAN NOTES: PROVIDE THE DETAIL REFERENCE IN NOTE 10.
39. SHEET 1S2.2; FOUNDATION PLAN: REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE (126 AT THE WALL) ON GRID A BETWEEN GRIDS 1 AND 2.
40. SHEET 1S2.2; FOUNDATION PLAN: REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE (131 AT SLAB JOINTS) NEAR GRID B BETWEEN GRIDS 2 AND 3.
41. SHEET 1S2.2; FOUNDATION PLAN: REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE (131 AT SLAB JOINTS) NEAR GRID C.4 BETWEEN GRIDS 5.5 AND 6.
42. SHEET 1S2.3; FOUNDATION PLAN: A DETAIL CUT 114 AT GRID G BETWEEN GRIDS 8 AND 9 IS COVERING ANOTHER DETAIL CUT. REVISE.
43. SHEET 1S2.4 (FOUNDATION PLAN); FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 14 INDICATES A 8" POST TENSIONED SLAB, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A 6" POST TENSIONED SLAB. CLARIFY.
44. SHEET 1S3.1; FRAMING PLAN: CLEAR UP THE GRID REFERENCES D AND E ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE SHEET.
45. SHEET 1S3.1; FRAMING PLAN: FOR CLARITY, REMOVE THE FLOOR FRAMING (INCLUDING THE ENLARGED PLAN) ON THIS PLAN. REFERENCE SHEET 1S3.3.
46. SHEETS 1S3.1/1S3.2/1S3.3/1S3.4/1S3.5; FRAMING NOTE 12: IS THE REFERENCE TO DETAIL 309 CORRECT? VERIFY.
47. SHEETS 1S3.1/1S3.2/1S3.3/1S3.4/1S3.5; FRAMING NOTE 25: CHANGE 'CARS' TO 'BARS'.
48. SHEET 1S3.1 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.1: A DETAIL 259 CUT AT GRID A.4 AND GRID 10.9 IS NOT SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEETS. ADD.
49. SHEET 1S3.1 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.0: A DETAIL 219 CUT NEAR GRID 13 AND GRID C IS INCORRECT. REVISE.
50. SHEET 1S3.1 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.3: A DETAIL 310 CUT NEAR GRID 7 AND GRID C IS INCORRECT. REVISE.
51. SHEETS 1S3.2/1S3.3/1S3.4 (FRAMING PLANS); SHEET S5.0 (DETAIL 212); SHEET S1.2 (COLUMN SCHEDULE): THE FRAMING PLANS DENOTE COLUMNS C4 (VARIOUS GRIDS) WITH NOTE 22, WHICH REFERENCES DETAIL 212. THAT DETAIL INDICATES THE COLUMN IS A HSS 6X3X3/8, WHILE THE COLUMN SCHEDULE INDICATES A HSS 6X3X1/4. CLARIFY.
52. SHEET 1S3.3 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 24): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE BEAMS DB12 ON GRID F ARE W27X84, WHILE THE FRAMING PLAN INDICATES W24X76. CLARIFY.
53. SHEET 1S3.3; FRAMING PLAN: CHANGE THE NOTATION FOR THE BEAM ON GRID F BETWEEN GRIDS 12 AND 13.3.
54. SHEET 1S3.3; FRAMING PLAN: REVISE THE SIZE OF THE BEAM (W21X48) ON GRID F BETWEEN GRIDS 10 AND 11.
55. SHEET 1S3.3 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 6): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THREE BEAMS DESIGNED AS DB15, WHILE THE PLANS INDICATE THREE DIFFERENT BEAM SIZES (GRID E BETWEEN GRIDS 10 AND 10.9; GRID F BETWEEN GRIDS 10 AND 12). CLARIFY.
56. SHEET 1S3.4 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET S5.4: A DETAIL 320 CUT ON GRID H BETWEEN GRIDS 9 AND 10 IS INCORRECT. REVISE.
57. SHEET 1S3.4 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.0 (DETAIL 212); SHEET S1.2 (COLUMN SCHEDULE): THE FRAMING PLAN DENOTES COLUMNS C4 (ON GRID E) WITH NOTE 22, WHICH REFERENCES DETAIL 212. THAT DETAIL INDICATES THE COLUMN IS A HSS 6X3X3/8, WHILE THE COLUMN SCHEDULE INDICATES A HSS 6X3X1/4. CLARIFY.
58. SHEET 2S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 66): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE FOOTINGS AT THE CANOPY ARE 12'-0" SQUARE X 18", WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES F8 (9'-0" SQUARE X 18"). CLARIFY.
59. SHEET 2S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: A DETAIL 138 CUT AT THE CANOPY IS NOT SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEETS. ADD.
60. SHEET 2S3.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: IS THE DETAIL 309 REFERENCED IN NOTE 12 CORRECT? VERIFY.
61. SHEET S4.0; DETAILS 107/108: THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT REQUIRES FOUNDATIONS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 18" BELOW GRADE. PROVIDE.
62. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 131: THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT REQUIRES FOUNDATIONS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 18" BELOW GRADE. PROVIDE.
63. SHEET S5.0; DETAIL 205: THIS DETAIL REFERENCES DETAIL 224 FOR THE BOLT SCHEDULE. REVISE.
64. SHEET S5.3; DETAIL 305: REVISE THE WELD LOCATION AT THE STEEL BEAM TO INDICATE THE JOIST TO BEAM CONNECTION.
65. SHEET S5.3; DETAIL 308: VERIFY THE BOX NOTE CONCERNING WELDING ANGLES TO THE COLUMN.
66. SHEET S5.4; DETAIL 319: THE FLANGE PLATE NOTE SHOULD BE REVISED. GIVE PLATE THICKNESS AND LENGTH.
67. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: LABEL THE JOISTS FROM SHEETS 78 THROUGH 96 TO COORDINATE WITH THE KEY PLAN.
68. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE DESIGN OF FLOOR BEAM DB13 WAS NOT LOCATED. VERIFY AND PROVIDE.
69. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE DESIGN OF FLOOR BEAM DB15 WAS NOT LOCATED. VERIFY AND PROVIDE.
70. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 183: FROM THE KEY PLAN, IT DOESN'T APPEAR ALL OF THE MASONRY WALLS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED, ALL OF THE WALL FOOTINGS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED, ALL OF THE COLUMNS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED, OR ALL OF THE COLUMN FOOTINGS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED. CLARIFY.
71. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE DESIGN OF THE POST TENSIONED SLAB WAS NOT LOCATED. VERIFY AND PROVIDE.
72. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED.
73. GENERAL: PROVIDE THE TOP OF FOOTING OR BOTTOM OF FOOTING ELEVATIONS ON THE PLANS OR DETAILS.
74. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.

END OF REVIEW
06/07/2011 SEPTIC APPROVAL WWM REVIEW Passed
06/07/2011 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1) PP 2e5.1 Provide overcurrent protection information for panel PLD (from PLC)

2) PP 2e2.2 identify ckt for GFCI recep in Boys 207.
06/07/2011 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/15/2011 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/15/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed