Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM01588
Parcel: 13104399H

Address:
4777 E 29TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T11CM01588
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/25/2011 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
05/25/2011 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
06/01/2011 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Cox Communications - 4777 E. 29th
T11CM01588
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 1, 2011

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site due to an expansion of building square footage greater than 25%.

2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 For the "EXISTING STORAGE UNIT TO REMAIN" shown on the plan show the size and height on the plan.

3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 The Mountain View Avenue perimeter yard setback is not shown correctly. As the project borders a Major Street and Route all street perimeter yards are based on LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B and measured for the back of curb. Provide the correct perimeter yard setback dimension. Zoning acknowledges that the building addition meets the minimum street perimeter yard setback.

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 It does not appear that the handicapped parking meets the requirements for Van Accessible. Provide a fully dimensioned accessible parking area and/or a detail for an accessible vehicle parking space.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 As this is a full code compliant review the requirements for Short & Long Term bicycle parking must be met. Review Ordinance 10886 LUC Section 3.3.8 and provide a detail for both Short & Long Term bicycle parking. The Short Term bicycle parking should include a fully dimensioned layout, materials for lighting, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles supported.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Provide the width dimensions for all points of egress and ingress to the site.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 There is a striped pedestrian circulation shown running through the "EXISTING STORAGE UNIT TO REMAIN". This route will not work.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 a continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route is required to all buildings on the site. That said show the required continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route to the "NEW MODULAR OFFICE BUILDING".

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage on the site plan.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Label 29th Street as an "MS&R ROUTE".

11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 The proposed use shown on the plan under General Note 3 does not appear to be correct. Based on the following LUC Definitions the proposed use does not meet the definition of a "DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM". LUC Section 6.3.5.8 Communications. Communications is an activity that provides information and entertainment services by such means as cable, radio, or microwave. Typical uses include radio and television broadcasting stations and telecommunication service centers and LUC Section 6.3.12.2 Distribution System. Distribution System is the dispensing or transforming of basic services, such as gas, electricity, or water, from one part of an interconnected system to another. Typical uses include electric substations, gas distribution substations, and water wells. That said remove the "DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM" from the proposed use and revise any effected calculations.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 Provide the gross floor area for the "EXISTING STORAGE UNIT TO REMAIN" on the plan as the vehicle parking calculation is based on gross floor area.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 The provided Floor Area Ration is not correct as it does not include the "EXISTING STORAGE UNIT TO REMAIN".

14. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per Ordinance #10886 LUC Sectiion3.3.4.2, Commercial Services Use Group the required parking ratio is 1 space per 300 sq. ft. GFA. This GFA also includes the "EXISTING STORAGE UNIT TO REMAIN".

15. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Per Ordinance #10886 LUC Sectiion3.3.8.2.B Commercial Use Group the required number of Long-Term bicycle parking spaces is two (2).

16. Zoning is willing to provide an over-the-counter review once the above comments have been addressed. Please call or email to schedule this appointment.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\2011\t11cm01588

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan.
06/07/2011 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied 1. A continuous pedestrian circulation accessible route is required to all buildings on the site. Please show an accessible route to the new modular office building.
a. Please provide all necessary marked crossings in compliance with ICC/ANSI 117.1 Sections 106, 406.12 and 406.13.
b. Insure all accessible routes both new and existing meet the slope requirements of ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3.
2. The marked crossing shown running through the "Existing Storage Unit to Remain" does not work. Please redesign and resubmit.
3. It does not appear that the handicapped parking meets the requirements for Van Accessible. Provide a fully dimensioned accessible parking area and/or a detail for an accessible vehicle parking space.
4. Provide a large scale detail of the actual designed accessible parking layout, curb ramps and sidewalk ramps. Show all accessible dimensions, slopes, signage, access to accessible routes and detectable warning strips as required. Generic typical details are not acceptable.
a. Provide and identify 1 of every six accessible as "Van Accessible".
b. Please provide exact design parking layouts, not generic plan layout.
5. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed.
END OF REVIEW
06/09/2011 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied June 10, 2011
T11CM01588

Provide dimensions for all vehicle use areas. Include curb radii.
Submit plans that are not marked as preliminary review, not for construction or recording.
Provide the drywell registration numbers on the site plan.
The drainage report is accepted for site plan approval purposes. Please include 2 copies of the plan with future submittals.
06/20/2011 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
06/20/2011 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Submit previously approved site and landscape plans for reference

2. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Dimension street landscape borders on Mountain Ave

3. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets.

4. Provide both the proper and common name of each type of plant material to remain in place DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e.

5. Provide existing and future Site Visibility Triangles (SVT's) on the landscape plan

6. Any screen or vegetation higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle LUC 3.7.3.4. Verify that all improvements greater then 30" are not located within the SVT's

7. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

8. Additional comments may apply.
06/24/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/18/2011 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/18/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed